Seek Returns logo

EW vs. PHG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EW and PHG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

EW is a standard domestic stock, while PHG trades as New York Registered Shares, providing U.S. investors with a way to invest in the foreign-based company.

SymbolEWPHG
Company NameEdwards Lifesciences CorporationKoninklijke Philips N.V.
CountryUnited StatesNetherlands
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesHealth Care Equipment & Supplies
Market Capitalization47.50 billion USD26.34 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 27, 2000March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockNY Reg Shrs

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EW and PHG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EW vs. PHG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEWPHG
5-Day Price Return-0.32%-0.13%
13-Week Price Return6.14%17.36%
26-Week Price Return10.37%-1.85%
52-Week Price Return17.67%-12.31%
Month-to-Date Return2.00%3.29%
Year-to-Date Return9.28%-2.21%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.25M1.30M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.40M1.84M
3-Month Volatility20.44%27.57%
Beta1.051.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EW

41.25%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
34.53%
Q3
19.38%
Median
9.52%
Q1
4.86%
Min
-7.58%

EW’s Return on Equity of 41.25% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PHG

-0.18%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
34.53%
Q3
19.38%
Median
9.52%
Q1
4.86%
Min
-7.58%

PHG has a negative Return on Equity of -0.18%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

EW vs. PHG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EW

72.96%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
13.06%
Median
9.53%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-3.87%

EW’s Net Profit Margin of 72.96% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

PHG

0.90%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
13.06%
Median
9.53%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-3.87%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s Net Profit Margin of 0.90% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

EW vs. PHG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EW

25.01%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.44%
Q3
17.80%
Median
13.95%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.01% places EW in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PHG

6.11%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.44%
Q3
17.80%
Median
13.95%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.56%

PHG’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.11% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

EW vs. PHG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEWPHG
Return on Equity (TTM)41.25%-0.18%
Return on Assets (TTM)31.58%-0.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)72.96%0.90%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)25.01%6.11%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)78.87%43.85%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EW

4.68

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.05
Median
2.14
Q1
1.49
Min
0.86

EW’s Current Ratio of 4.68 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PHG

1.26

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.05
Median
2.14
Q1
1.49
Min
0.86

PHG’s Current Ratio of 1.26 falls into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

EW vs. PHG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EW

0.06

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.71
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, EW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.06 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

PHG

0.81

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.71
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

PHG’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.81. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

EW vs. PHG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EW

3.15

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
58.29
Q3
25.56
Median
9.06
Q1
3.60
Min
-28.92

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, EW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.15 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

PHG

1.41

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
58.29
Q3
25.56
Median
9.06
Q1
3.60
Min
-28.92

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

EW vs. PHG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEWPHG
Current Ratio (MRQ)4.681.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)3.790.81
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.060.81
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.151.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

EW vs. PHG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EW vs. PHG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EW

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.05%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EW currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PHG

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.05%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHG’s Dividend Yield of 0.00% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EW vs. PHG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EW

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
72.47%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EW has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PHG

0.42%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
72.47%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.42% is within the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EW vs. PHG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEWPHG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.42%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EW

11.41

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
73.48
Q3
51.69
Median
34.31
Q1
25.74
Min
11.47

EW’s P/E Ratio of 11.41 is below the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This may indicate that the stock is potentially undervalued, or it could reflect market concerns about the company’s future prospects.

PHG

140.05

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
73.48
Q3
51.69
Median
34.31
Q1
25.74
Min
11.47

At 140.05, PHG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

EW vs. PHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EW

8.33

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.53
Q3
5.26
Median
3.39
Q1
2.13
Min
0.00

EW’s P/S Ratio of 8.33 is in the upper echelon for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PHG

1.26

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.53
Q3
5.26
Median
3.39
Q1
2.13
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s P/S Ratio of 1.26 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

EW vs. PHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EW

4.35

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
5.98
Median
3.48
Q1
2.43
Min
0.69

EW’s P/B Ratio of 4.35 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PHG

1.89

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
5.98
Median
3.48
Q1
2.43
Min
0.69

PHG’s P/B Ratio of 1.89 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

EW vs. PHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEWPHG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.41140.05
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.331.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.351.89
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)62.3014.66