ESLT vs. IR: Elbit Systems vs. Ingersoll Rand Stock Comparison
How do Elbit Systems (ESLT) and Ingersoll Rand (IR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Elbit Systems (ESLT) and Ingersoll Rand (IR) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but ESLT is classified in Aerospace & Defense while IR is classified in Machinery.
| Profile Item | ESLT | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Elbit Systems Ltd. | Ingersoll Rand Inc. |
| Country/Region | Israel | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 32.00 billion USD | 31.87 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 27, 1996 | May 12, 2017 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ESLT | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 55.34% | 12.39% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 57.29% | 9.19% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 37.24% | 8.02% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Ingersoll Rand (IR) trades around 4.27M shares per day on average, while Elbit Systems (ESLT) sees only 88.09K — a volume gap that can matter for position sizing, exit liquidity, and order execution.
| Metric | ESLT | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 47.34% | 34.08% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.10 | 1.12 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -35.54% | -36.62% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 88.09K | 4.27M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ESLT | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.08 | 0.24 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.76 | 0.37 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 15.24% and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 13.41% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
15.24%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- ESLT
- 15.24%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
13.41%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- IR
- 13.41%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 17.20% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 7.44%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
7.44%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- ESLT
- 7.44%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
17.20%
- Max
- 27.47%
- IR
- 17.20%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 18.79% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 9.57%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
9.57%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- ESLT
- 9.57%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
18.79%
- Max
- 36.60%
- IR
- 18.79%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ESLT | IR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 15.24% | 13.41% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.87% | 4.98% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 7.44% | 17.20% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 9.57% | 18.79% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 25.03% | 42.57% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 16.27% and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 5.75% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 58.64% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at -29.61% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ESLT | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 16.27% | 5.75% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 12.93% | 8.95% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 58.64% | -29.61% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 22.61% | -0.46% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 1.69 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 1.40 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for ESLT.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
1.40
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- ESLT
- 1.40
- Min
- 0.36
IR
Capital Goods industry group
1.69
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- IR
- 1.69
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 0.19 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.46 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
0.19
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- ESLT
- 0.19
- Min
- 0.00
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.46
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- IR
- 0.46
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ESLT | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.40 | 1.69 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.19 | 0.46 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.11 | 1.76 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 0.58% and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.10% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
0.58%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- ESLT
- 0.58%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.10%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- IR
- 0.10%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 23.33% and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 2.27% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
23.33%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- ESLT
- 23.33%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
2.27%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- IR
- 2.27%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ESLT | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.58% | 0.10% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 23.33% | 2.27% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 23.51 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 51.36 sits in the richer quartile — ESLT needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
51.36
- Max
- 59.38
- ESLT
- 51.36
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
IR
Capital Goods industry group
23.51
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- IR
- 23.51
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 3.74 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.96 sits in the pricier quartile — IR costs more per dollar of sales.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
3.74
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- ESLT
- 3.74
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.96
- Max
- 7.54
- IR
- 3.96
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.03 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 7.24 carries an above-peer premium to book — ESLT is pricier on assets.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
7.24
- Max
- 9.66
- ESLT
- 7.24
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.03
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- IR
- 3.03
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ESLT | IR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 51.36 | 23.51 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.74 | 3.96 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 7.24 | 3.03 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -0.12% | 3.19% |