ESLT vs. HON: Elbit Systems vs. Honeywell Stock Comparison
How do Elbit Systems (ESLT) and Honeywell (HON) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Elbit Systems (ESLT) and Honeywell (HON) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but ESLT is classified in Aerospace & Defense while HON is classified in Industrial Conglomerates.
| Profile Item | ESLT | HON |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Elbit Systems Ltd. | Honeywell International Inc. |
| Country/Region | Israel | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Industrial Conglomerates |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Industrial Conglomerates |
| Market Capitalization | 32.00 billion USD | 69.74 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | November 27, 1996 | January 2, 1962 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ESLT | HON |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 55.34% | 14.14% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 57.29% | 9.90% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 37.24% | 2.32% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Honeywell (HON) trades around 2.82M shares per day on average, while Elbit Systems (ESLT) sees only 88.09K — a volume gap that can matter for position sizing, exit liquidity, and order execution.
| Metric | ESLT | HON |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 47.34% | 27.11% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.10 | 0.80 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -35.54% | -25.21% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 88.09K | 2.82M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ESLT | HON |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.08 | 0.36 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.76 | 0.52 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Honeywell (HON) at 44.39% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 15.24%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
15.24%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- ESLT
- 15.24%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
HON
Capital Goods industry group
44.39%
- HON
- 44.39%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Honeywell (HON) at 18.68% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 7.44%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
7.44%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- ESLT
- 7.44%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
HON
Capital Goods industry group
18.68%
- Max
- 27.47%
- HON
- 18.68%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 9.57% and Honeywell (HON) at 16.92% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
9.57%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- ESLT
- 9.57%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
HON
Capital Goods industry group
16.92%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- HON
- 16.92%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ESLT | HON |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 15.24% | 44.39% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.87% | 7.13% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 7.44% | 18.68% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 9.57% | 16.92% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 25.03% | 37.21% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 16.27% and Honeywell (HON) at 7.85% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 58.64% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Honeywell (HON) at -8.27% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for ESLT.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ESLT | HON |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 16.27% | 7.85% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 12.93% | 1.82% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 58.64% | -8.27% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 22.61% | 3.20% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 1.40 and Honeywell (HON) at 0.96 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
1.40
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- ESLT
- 1.40
- Min
- 0.36
HON
Capital Goods industry group
0.96
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- HON
- 0.96
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 0.19 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Honeywell (HON) at 0.76 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
0.19
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- ESLT
- 0.19
- Min
- 0.00
HON
Capital Goods industry group
0.76
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- HON
- 0.76
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ESLT | HON |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.40 | 0.96 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.19 | 0.76 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.11 | 1.23 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 0.58% pays an industry-typical yield; Honeywell (HON) at 3.63% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
0.58%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- ESLT
- 0.58%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
HON
Capital Goods industry group
3.63%
- HON
- 3.63%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 23.33% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Honeywell (HON) at 38.87% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
23.33%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- ESLT
- 23.33%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
HON
Capital Goods industry group
38.87%
- Max
- 67.39%
- HON
- 38.87%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ESLT | HON |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.58% | 3.63% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 23.33% | 38.87% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Honeywell (HON) at 10.91 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 51.36 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
51.36
- Max
- 59.38
- ESLT
- 51.36
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
HON
Capital Goods industry group
10.91
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- HON
- 10.91
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 3.74 and Honeywell (HON) at 1.85 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
3.74
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- ESLT
- 3.74
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
HON
Capital Goods industry group
1.85
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- HON
- 1.85
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Honeywell (HON) at 3.12 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 7.24 carries an above-peer premium to book — ESLT is pricier on assets.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
7.24
- Max
- 9.66
- ESLT
- 7.24
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
HON
Capital Goods industry group
3.12
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- HON
- 3.12
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ESLT | HON |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 51.36 | 10.91 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.74 | 1.85 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 7.24 | 3.12 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -0.12% | 10.07% |