ERIC vs. IONQ: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson vs. IonQ Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (ERIC) and IonQ (IONQ) both fall under the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group, but ERIC is classified in Communications Equipment while IONQ is classified in Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (ERIC) has more than two decades of public-market history since August 24, 1981, whereas IonQ (IONQ) listed on January 4, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

IonQ (IONQ) trades as ordinary local shares, while Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (ERIC) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

IonQ (IONQ) carries a highly aggressive beta of 3.33, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (ERIC) is closer to market-like at 0.96 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (ERIC) at 18.09% and IonQ (IONQ) at 6.90% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

IonQ (IONQ) at 67.09% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (ERIC) at 8.36% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.

IonQ (IONQ) reports a negative operating margin of -249.14%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (ERIC) reports 0.00%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

IonQ (IONQ) at 201.85% delivers above-range revenue growth, while Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (ERIC) at -4.52% falls into the bottom quartile — a wide split in revenue momentum.

Only one side can be read here: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (ERIC) reports EPS growth of 85,000.00%, ranked against its industry; IonQ (IONQ) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

IonQ (IONQ) at 4.24 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (ERIC) at 1.16 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

IonQ (IONQ) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (ERIC) at 0.41 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (ERIC) nor IonQ (IONQ) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

IonQ (IONQ) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (ERIC) reports a payout of 51.66%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (ERIC) at 16.55 and IonQ (IONQ) at 18.86 sit in the cheaper earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, with the market paying less for a dollar of trailing earnings than it pays for typical peers.

A sales-based read is only available for IonQ (IONQ), whose P/S ratio of 39.84 ranks against industry peers; Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (ERIC) reports no figure this period.

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (ERIC) at 0.33 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while IonQ (IONQ) at 2.67 is valued near its industry’s middle — ERIC is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

Valuation Metrics