Seek Returns logo

EQT vs. SLB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EQT and SLB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEQTSLB
Company NameEQT CorporationSLB N.V.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsEnergy Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization35.59 billion USD54.07 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980December 31, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EQT and SLB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EQT vs. SLB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEQTSLB
5-Day Price Return-5.93%-4.74%
13-Week Price Return8.26%4.08%
26-Week Price Return1.42%0.23%
52-Week Price Return27.84%-18.35%
Month-to-Date Return5.17%-2.41%
Year-to-Date Return22.21%-8.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.14M11.39M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.06M16.40M
3-Month Volatility30.89%30.21%
Beta0.660.74

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EQT

8.29%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
16.09%
Median
9.55%
Q1
5.28%
Min
-10.03%

EQT’s Return on Equity of 8.29% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SLB

16.84%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
29.69%
Q3
19.07%
Median
12.78%
Q1
7.78%
Min
-4.04%

SLB’s Return on Equity of 16.84% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EQT vs. SLB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EQT

22.57%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
43.98%
Q3
20.46%
Median
8.67%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-7.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 22.57% places EQT in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SLB

10.34%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
16.51%
Q3
8.94%
Median
5.91%
Q1
3.84%
Min
-2.81%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.34% places SLB in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

EQT vs. SLB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EQT

37.18%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
30.55%
Median
17.92%
Q1
6.58%
Min
-25.19%

An Operating Profit Margin of 37.18% places EQT in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SLB

13.97%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
33.80%
Q3
17.55%
Median
11.05%
Q1
4.67%
Min
-1.49%

SLB’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.97% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EQT vs. SLB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEQTSLB
Return on Equity (TTM)8.29%16.84%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.44%7.23%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)22.57%10.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)37.18%13.97%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)62.55%19.75%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EQT

0.58

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.59
Q3
1.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.85
Min
0.31

EQT’s Current Ratio of 0.58 falls into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SLB

1.39

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
2.08
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.70

SLB’s Current Ratio of 1.39 aligns with the median group of the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EQT vs. SLB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EQT

0.36

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

EQT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SLB

0.50

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.09
Q3
1.06
Median
0.48
Q1
0.33
Min
0.02

SLB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50 is typical for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EQT vs. SLB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EQT

1.75

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.04
Q3
20.96
Median
7.19
Q1
2.54
Min
-19.25

In the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, EQT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.75 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

SLB

43.97

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
27.00
Median
9.96
Q1
2.52
Min
-17.36

SLB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.97 is in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

EQT vs. SLB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEQTSLB
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.581.39
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.531.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.360.50
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.7543.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

EQT vs. SLB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EQT vs. SLB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EQT

1.08%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
11.17%
Q3
6.18%
Median
4.23%
Q1
2.56%
Min
0.00%

EQT’s Dividend Yield of 1.08% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

SLB

2.99%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
7.69%
Q3
4.11%
Median
2.39%
Q1
0.24%
Min
0.00%

SLB’s Dividend Yield of 2.99% is consistent with its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EQT vs. SLB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EQT

21.38%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
177.24%
Q3
98.32%
Median
58.16%
Q1
28.57%
Min
0.00%

EQT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.38% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

SLB

42.94%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
169.85%
Q3
97.80%
Median
44.61%
Q1
15.01%
Min
0.00%

SLB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 42.94% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EQT vs. SLB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEQTSLB
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.08%2.99%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)21.38%42.94%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EQT

19.82

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
38.10
Q3
21.29
Median
13.95
Q1
9.93
Min
2.48

EQT’s P/E Ratio of 19.82 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SLB

14.38

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
26.39
Q3
20.56
Median
14.49
Q1
10.91
Min
7.44

SLB’s P/E Ratio of 14.38 is within the middle range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EQT vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EQT

4.47

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.81
Median
1.43
Q1
0.60
Min
0.15

EQT’s P/S Ratio of 4.47 is in the upper echelon for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SLB

1.49

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.92
Q3
1.59
Median
0.89
Q1
0.57
Min
0.20

SLB’s P/S Ratio of 1.49 aligns with the market consensus for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EQT vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EQT

1.47

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.41
Q1
0.94
Min
0.45

EQT’s P/B Ratio of 1.47 is within the conventional range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SLB

2.00

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
4.87
Q3
2.69
Median
1.77
Q1
1.14
Min
0.43

SLB’s P/B Ratio of 2.00 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EQT vs. SLB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEQTSLB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.8214.38
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.471.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.472.00
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.2212.83