EQH vs. PYPL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 12, 2025

Here’s a clear look at EQH and PYPL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	EQH	PYPL
Company Name	Equitable Holdings, Inc.	PayPal Holdings, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Financial Services	Financial Services
Market Capitalization	15.06 billion USD	72.73 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	May 10, 2018	July 6, 2015
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EQH and PYPL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EQH vs. PYPL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	EQH	PYPL
5-Day Price Return	-0.14%	10.45%
13-Week Price Return	-5.43%	1.74%
26-Week Price Return	0.16%	23.37%
52-Week Price Return	17.64%	-5.15%
Month-to-Date Return	-0.96%	13.53%
Year-to-Date Return	6.61%	-10.80%
10-Day Avg. Volume	3.04M	17.86M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.80M	11.51M
3-Month Volatility	25.56%	34.49%
Beta	1.14	1.42

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EQH

22.93%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 39.28%
Q3: 18.88%
Median: 9.97%
Q1: 4.03%
Min: -10.25%

In the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, EQH’s Return on Equity of 22.93% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PYPL

23.09%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 39.28%
Q3: 18.88%
Median: 9.97%
Q1: 4.03%
Min: -10.25%

In the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, PYPL’s Return on Equity of 23.09% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

EQH vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EQH

3.02%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.16%
Q3: 25.35%
Median: 12.68%
Q1: 6.11%
Min: -11.69%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, EQH’s Net Profit Margin of 3.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

PYPL

14.49%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.16%
Q3: 25.35%
Median: 12.68%
Q1: 6.11%
Min: -11.69%

PYPL’s Net Profit Margin of 14.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EQH vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EQH

17.41%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 75.57%
Q3: 37.78%
Median: 19.09%
Q1: 10.04%
Min: -19.42%

EQH’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.41% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PYPL

18.17%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 75.57%
Q3: 37.78%
Median: 19.09%
Q1: 10.04%
Min: -19.42%

PYPL’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.17% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EQH vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	EQH	PYPL
Return on Equity (TTM)	22.93%	23.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.16%	5.74%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	3.02%	14.49%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	17.41%	18.17%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	51.52%	41.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EQH

1.67

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.83
Q3: 2.70
Median: 1.44
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

PYPL

1.33

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.83
Q3: 2.70
Median: 1.44
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

EQH vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EQH

20.12

Financial Services Industry

Max: 5.07
Q3: 2.14
Median: 0.66
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

PYPL

0.56

Financial Services Industry

Max: 5.07
Q3: 2.14
Median: 0.66
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

EQH vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EQH

1.76

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

PYPL

1,066.80

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

EQH vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	EQH	PYPL
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.67	1.33
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.67	1.28
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	20.12	0.56
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	1.76	1,066.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

EQH vs. PYPL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EQH vs. PYPL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EQH

2.51%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.12%
Q3: 3.37%
Median: 1.70%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

EQH’s Dividend Yield of 2.51% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PYPL

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.12%
Q3: 3.37%
Median: 1.70%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PYPL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EQH vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EQH

21.08%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 132.10%
Q3: 64.32%
Median: 18.23%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

EQH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.08% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PYPL

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 132.10%
Q3: 64.32%
Median: 18.23%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PYPL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EQH vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	EQH	PYPL
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.51%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	21.08%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EQH

31.55

Financial Services Industry

Max: 45.81
Q3: 30.21
Median: 16.29
Q1: 10.14
Min: 0.70

A P/E Ratio of 31.55 places EQH in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PYPL

15.54

Financial Services Industry

Max: 45.81
Q3: 30.21
Median: 16.29
Q1: 10.14
Min: 0.70

PYPL’s P/E Ratio of 15.54 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EQH vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EQH

0.95

Financial Services Industry

Max: 10.88
Q3: 5.34
Median: 2.64
Q1: 1.24
Min: 0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

PYPL

2.25

Financial Services Industry

Max: 10.88
Q3: 5.34
Median: 2.64
Q1: 1.24
Min: 0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

EQH vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EQH

14.84

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.93
Q3: 3.78
Median: 1.49
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.08

At 14.84, EQH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PYPL

3.58

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.93
Q3: 3.78
Median: 1.49
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.08

PYPL’s P/B Ratio of 3.58 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EQH vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Financial Services industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	EQH	PYPL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	31.55	15.54
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.95	2.25
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	14.84	3.58
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	10.00	13.74