Seek Returns

EPAM vs. IBM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Here’s a clear look at EPAM and IBM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEPAMIBM
Company NameEPAM Systems, Inc.International Business Machines Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS Industry GroupSoftware & ServicesSoftware & Services
GICS IndustryIT ServicesIT Services
GICS Sub-IndustryIT Consulting & Other ServicesIT Consulting & Other Services
Market Capitalization5.18 billion USD210.11 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 8, 2012January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

IBM’s market capitalization (210.11 billion USD) is significantly greater than EPAM’s (5.18 billion USD), highlighting its more substantial market valuation.

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EPAM and IBM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EPAM
IBM
Loading price history…
EPAM vs. IBM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEPAMIBM
5-Day Price Return-10.28%-2.39%
13-Week Price Return-44.09%-25.22%
26-Week Price Return-39.32%-26.64%
52-Week Price Return-44.78%-10.29%
Month-to-Date Return-12.79%-3.22%
Year-to-Date Return-51.57%-24.53%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.76M5.49M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.27M5.93M
3-Month Volatility53.62%44.19%
Beta1.440.56

EPAM’s beta of 1.44 points to significantly higher volatility compared to IBM (beta: 0.56), suggesting EPAM has greater potential for both gains and losses relative to market movements.

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EPAM

10.27%

IT Services Industry
Max
38.00%
Q3
18.66%
Median
14.40%
Q1
2.80%
Min
-20.08%

EPAM’s Return on Equity of 10.27% is on par with the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IBM

35.53%

IT Services Industry
Max
38.00%
Q3
18.66%
Median
14.40%
Q1
2.80%
Min
-20.08%

In the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, IBM’s Return on Equity of 35.53% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

EPAM vs. IBM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EPAM

6.92%

IT Services Industry
Max
20.89%
Q3
10.75%
Median
7.13%
Q1
1.94%
Min
-9.79%

EPAM’s Net Profit Margin of 6.92% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the IT Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

IBM

15.60%

IT Services Industry
Max
20.89%
Q3
10.75%
Median
7.13%
Q1
1.94%
Min
-9.79%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.60% places IBM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

EPAM vs. IBM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EPAM

9.53%

IT Services Industry
Max
23.73%
Q3
14.65%
Median
9.36%
Q1
4.97%
Min
-8.09%

EPAM’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.53% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

IBM

15.32%

IT Services Industry
Max
23.73%
Q3
14.65%
Median
9.36%
Q1
4.97%
Min
-8.09%

An Operating Profit Margin of 15.32% places IBM in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

EPAM vs. IBM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEPAMIBM
Return on Equity (TTM)10.27%35.53%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.88%7.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)6.92%15.60%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.53%15.32%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)28.88%58.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EPAM

2.59

IT Services Industry
Max
2.61
Q3
1.98
Median
1.41
Q1
1.00
Min
0.36

EPAM’s Current Ratio of 2.59 is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

IBM

0.80

IT Services Industry
Max
2.61
Q3
1.98
Median
1.41
Q1
1.00
Min
0.36

IBM’s Current Ratio of 0.80 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

EPAM vs. IBM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EPAM

0.01

IT Services Industry
Max
2.24
Q3
1.10
Median
0.51
Q1
0.13
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, EPAM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.01 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

IBM

2.01

IT Services Industry
Max
2.24
Q3
1.10
Median
0.51
Q1
0.13
Min
0.00

IBM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.01. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

EPAM vs. IBM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EPAM

29.33

IT Services Industry
Max
100.81
Q3
50.30
Median
15.71
Q1
1.44
Min
-28.15

EPAM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 29.33 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

IBM

45.57

IT Services Industry
Max
100.81
Q3
50.30
Median
15.71
Q1
1.44
Min
-28.15

IBM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 45.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the IT Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EPAM vs. IBM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEPAMIBM
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.590.80
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.460.68
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.012.01
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)29.3345.57

Growth

Revenue Growth

EPAM vs. IBM: A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolEPAMIBM
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)12.75%9.46%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)15.42%9.67%
3-Year Revenue CAGR4.19%3.72%
5-Year Revenue CAGR15.46%4.12%

EPS Growth

EPAM vs. IBM: A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolEPAMIBM
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)9.89%14.24%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)-14.17%94.45%
3-Year EPS CAGR-1.76%83.85%
5-Year EPS CAGR3.69%12.36%

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EPAM

0.00%

IT Services Industry
Max
5.48%
Q3
2.33%
Median
0.83%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EPAM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

IBM

2.99%

IT Services Industry
Max
5.48%
Q3
2.33%
Median
0.83%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.99%, IBM offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the IT Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

EPAM vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EPAM

0.00%

IT Services Industry
Max
93.78%
Q3
42.50%
Median
18.30%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EPAM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

IBM

58.43%

IT Services Industry
Max
93.78%
Q3
42.50%
Median
18.30%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

IBM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 58.43% is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

EPAM vs. IBM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEPAMIBM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.99%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%58.43%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EPAM

13.86

IT Services Industry
Max
48.11
Q3
29.84
Median
15.98
Q1
12.08
Min
3.80

EPAM’s P/E Ratio of 13.86 is within the middle range for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

IBM

19.52

IT Services Industry
Max
48.11
Q3
29.84
Median
15.98
Q1
12.08
Min
3.80

IBM’s P/E Ratio of 19.52 is within the middle range for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EPAM vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EPAM

0.96

IT Services Industry
Max
9.77
Q3
5.15
Median
1.67
Q1
1.10
Min
0.18

In the lower quartile for the IT Services industry, EPAM’s P/S Ratio of 0.96 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

IBM

3.05

IT Services Industry
Max
9.77
Q3
5.15
Median
1.67
Q1
1.10
Min
0.18

IBM’s P/S Ratio of 3.05 aligns with the market consensus for the IT Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EPAM vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EPAM

3.08

IT Services Industry
Max
10.70
Q3
5.80
Median
3.76
Q1
2.53
Min
1.51

EPAM’s P/B Ratio of 3.08 is within the conventional range for the IT Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IBM

6.91

IT Services Industry
Max
10.70
Q3
5.80
Median
3.76
Q1
2.53
Min
1.51

IBM’s P/B Ratio of 6.91 is in the upper tier for the IT Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

EPAM vs. IBM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the IT Services industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEPAMIBM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)13.8619.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.963.05
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.086.91
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.5417.12