Seek Returns logo

ENPH vs. LNG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ENPH and LNG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolENPHLNG
Company NameEnphase Energy, Inc.Cheniere Energy, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyEnergy
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization4.71 billion USD51.81 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGMNYSE
Listing DateMarch 30, 2012April 4, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ENPH and LNG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ENPH vs. LNG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolENPHLNG
5-Day Price Return-4.53%1.70%
13-Week Price Return-15.92%-0.09%
26-Week Price Return-38.69%7.12%
52-Week Price Return-66.12%24.05%
Month-to-Date Return1.81%0.32%
Year-to-Date Return-47.54%9.71%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.87M1.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.64M1.81M
3-Month Volatility60.03%24.99%
Beta1.440.28

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ENPH

20.22%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

ENPH’s Return on Equity of 20.22% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LNG

66.68%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
27.06%
Q3
16.37%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-8.98%

LNG’s Return on Equity of 66.68% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ENPH vs. LNG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ENPH

11.78%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

ENPH’s Net Profit Margin of 11.78% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LNG

21.05%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
48.48%
Q3
21.05%
Median
9.42%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-26.95%

LNG’s Net Profit Margin of 21.05% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ENPH vs. LNG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ENPH

11.70%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

ENPH’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.70% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LNG

37.61%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
31.04%
Median
18.00%
Q1
5.41%
Min
-32.54%

An Operating Profit Margin of 37.61% places LNG in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ENPH vs. LNG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolENPHLNG
Return on Equity (TTM)20.22%66.68%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.46%8.79%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.78%21.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.70%37.61%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.35%47.15%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ENPH

1.97

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

ENPH’s Current Ratio of 1.97 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LNG

0.98

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
1.63
Median
1.22
Q1
0.86
Min
0.30

LNG’s Current Ratio of 0.98 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ENPH vs. LNG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ENPH

1.37

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.37, ENPH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

LNG

3.37

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.37, LNG operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ENPH vs. LNG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ENPH

3.72

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, ENPH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.72 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

LNG

7.46

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
51.08
Q3
22.26
Median
7.32
Q1
2.72
Min
-19.25

LNG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.46 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ENPH vs. LNG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolENPHLNG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.970.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.540.85
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.373.37
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.727.46

Growth

Revenue Growth

ENPH vs. LNG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ENPH vs. LNG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ENPH

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ENPH currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LNG

0.83%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
12.74%
Q3
7.02%
Median
4.37%
Q1
2.64%
Min
0.00%

LNG’s Dividend Yield of 0.83% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ENPH vs. LNG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ENPH

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ENPH has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LNG

11.25%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
188.73%
Q3
95.12%
Median
63.48%
Q1
28.55%
Min
0.00%

LNG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 11.25% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

ENPH vs. LNG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolENPHLNG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.83%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%11.25%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ENPH

27.14

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

ENPH’s P/E Ratio of 27.14 is within the middle range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LNG

13.53

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
34.98
Q3
21.60
Median
13.15
Q1
8.17
Min
2.22

LNG’s P/E Ratio of 13.53 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ENPH vs. LNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ENPH

3.20

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

ENPH’s P/S Ratio of 3.20 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LNG

2.85

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.73
Median
1.36
Q1
0.54
Min
0.12

LNG’s P/S Ratio of 2.85 is in the upper echelon for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ENPH vs. LNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ENPH

5.91

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

ENPH’s P/B Ratio of 5.91 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LNG

8.05

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.23
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

At 8.05, LNG’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ENPH vs. LNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolENPHLNG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.1413.53
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.202.85
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.918.05
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.7116.45