Seek Returns logo

EMR vs. MMM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EMR and MMM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEMRMMM
Company NameEmerson Electric Co.3M Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentIndustrial Conglomerates
Market Capitalization74.82 billion USD83.09 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EMR and MMM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EMR vs. MMM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEMRMMM
5-Day Price Return-0.08%-1.76%
13-Week Price Return-4.91%0.01%
26-Week Price Return30.47%11.64%
52-Week Price Return18.15%15.68%
Month-to-Date Return1.34%0.53%
Year-to-Date Return7.27%20.85%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.88M2.34M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.12M3.13M
3-Month Volatility23.72%23.16%
Beta1.251.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EMR

13.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
35.67%
Q3
23.64%
Median
11.74%
Q1
6.08%
Min
-4.39%

EMR’s Return on Equity of 13.06% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
13.64%
Median
9.41%
Q1
5.80%
Min
-3.73%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

EMR vs. MMM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

14.92%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.60%
Q3
10.26%
Median
5.83%
Q1
2.92%
Min
-0.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.92% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
26.43%
Q3
13.08%
Median
9.39%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-2.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

EMR vs. MMM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

17.42%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.24%
Q3
14.53%
Median
7.97%
Q1
3.45%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.42% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
27.02%
Q3
17.23%
Median
12.90%
Q1
8.32%
Min
-3.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

EMR vs. MMM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEMRMMM
Return on Equity (TTM)13.06%91.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.19%9.93%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.92%16.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.42%19.46%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.70%41.11%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.85

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.09
Median
1.48
Q1
1.09
Min
0.85

EMR’s Current Ratio of 0.85 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.40
Q3
1.69
Median
1.35
Q1
1.14
Min
0.56

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

EMR vs. MMM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.72

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
0.96
Median
0.57
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

EMR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.49
Median
0.91
Q1
0.63
Min
0.24

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

EMR vs. MMM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EMR

18.57

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
44.15
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
0.98
Min
-19.47

EMR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 18.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
19.80
Q3
10.68
Median
4.59
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

EMR vs. MMM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEMRMMM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.851.72
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.631.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.723.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)18.57-15.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

EMR vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EMR vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EMR

1.62%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.04%
Q3
1.58%
Median
1.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.62%, EMR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MMM

1.88%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
9.82%
Q3
5.04%
Median
3.09%
Q1
1.67%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.88% is consistent with its peers in the Industrial Conglomerates industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

EMR vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EMR

45.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
165.68%
Q3
71.84%
Median
38.15%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.06% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
182.48%
Q3
97.89%
Median
55.48%
Q1
31.63%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EMR vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEMRMMM
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.62%1.88%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)45.06%39.27%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EMR

27.83

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
65.02
Q3
38.99
Median
27.41
Q1
19.88
Min
8.37

EMR’s P/E Ratio of 27.83 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MMM

20.94

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
45.17
Q3
25.68
Median
15.16
Q1
8.58
Min
0.79

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 20.94 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EMR vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EMR

4.15

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
7.01
Q3
4.03
Median
1.79
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

EMR’s P/S Ratio of 4.15 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MMM

3.35

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.18
Q3
2.15
Median
0.69
Q1
0.41
Min
0.09

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

EMR vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

3.77

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
10.97
Q3
5.57
Median
3.50
Q1
1.66
Min
0.64

EMR’s P/B Ratio of 3.77 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
5.44
Q3
2.68
Median
0.97
Q1
0.52
Min
0.04

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

EMR vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEMRMMM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.8320.94
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.153.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.7718.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.9330.88