Seek Returns logo

EMR vs. GWW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EMR and GWW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEMRGWW
Company NameEmerson Electric Co.W.W. Grainger, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentTrading Companies & Distributors
Market Capitalization73.66 billion USD47.81 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EMR and GWW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EMR vs. GWW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEMRGWW
5-Day Price Return-2.59%2.57%
13-Week Price Return9.46%-9.16%
26-Week Price Return4.46%-2.74%
52-Week Price Return26.05%4.33%
Month-to-Date Return-10.05%-3.84%
Year-to-Date Return5.62%-5.16%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.99M0.29M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.16M0.28M
3-Month Volatility20.65%26.99%
Beta1.311.20

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EMR

13.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

EMR’s Return on Equity of 13.06% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GWW

54.86%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.33%
Q3
19.92%
Median
14.05%
Q1
11.46%
Min
0.91%

GWW’s Return on Equity of 54.86% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

EMR vs. GWW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

14.92%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.92% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GWW

10.99%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
17.73%
Q3
10.81%
Median
6.13%
Q1
4.33%
Min
2.09%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.99% places GWW in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

EMR vs. GWW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

17.42%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.42% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GWW

15.27%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
25.50%
Q3
15.13%
Median
7.46%
Q1
5.44%
Min
3.55%

An Operating Profit Margin of 15.27% places GWW in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

EMR vs. GWW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEMRGWW
Return on Equity (TTM)13.06%54.86%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.19%21.63%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.92%10.99%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.42%15.27%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.70%39.25%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.85

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

EMR’s Current Ratio of 0.85 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GWW

2.82

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.13
Median
1.60
Q1
1.43
Min
0.46

GWW’s Current Ratio of 2.82 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

EMR vs. GWW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.72

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

EMR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GWW

0.64

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.88
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

GWW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.64 is typical for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EMR vs. GWW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EMR

18.57

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

EMR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 18.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GWW

34.56

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.75
Q1
2.70
Min
-1.67

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 34.56, GWW demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

EMR vs. GWW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEMRGWW
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.852.82
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.631.53
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.720.64
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)18.5734.56

Growth

Revenue Growth

EMR vs. GWW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EMR vs. GWW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EMR

1.61%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.61%, EMR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

GWW

0.92%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
3.04%
Median
1.94%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

GWW’s Dividend Yield of 0.92% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

EMR vs. GWW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EMR

45.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.06% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GWW

22.89%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
95.14%
Q3
62.08%
Median
51.17%
Q1
26.24%
Min
0.00%

GWW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.89% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

EMR vs. GWW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEMRGWW
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.61%0.92%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)45.06%22.89%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EMR

27.96

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

EMR’s P/E Ratio of 27.96 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GWW

24.84

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
48.55
Q3
26.73
Median
17.17
Q1
10.78
Min
1.62

GWW’s P/E Ratio of 24.84 is within the middle range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EMR vs. GWW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EMR

4.17

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

EMR’s P/S Ratio of 4.17 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GWW

2.73

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.88
Q3
2.56
Median
1.02
Q1
0.60
Min
0.29

GWW’s P/S Ratio of 2.73 is in the upper echelon for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

EMR vs. GWW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

3.77

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

EMR’s P/B Ratio of 3.77 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GWW

13.60

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
8.77
Q3
4.33
Median
2.00
Q1
1.11
Min
0.35

At 13.60, GWW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

EMR vs. GWW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEMRGWW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.9624.84
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.172.73
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.7713.60
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)27.0533.72