Seek Returns logo

EMR vs. GD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at EMR and GD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolEMRGD
Company NameEmerson Electric Co.General Dynamics Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization73.83 billion USD91.66 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EMR and GD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EMR vs. GD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolEMRGD
5-Day Price Return-0.56%5.03%
13-Week Price Return-1.61%15.75%
26-Week Price Return15.49%26.44%
52-Week Price Return20.11%12.76%
Month-to-Date Return-0.62%-0.07%
Year-to-Date Return5.85%29.32%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.68M1.43M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.17M1.12M
3-Month Volatility23.54%16.81%
Beta1.290.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EMR

13.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
35.67%
Q3
23.64%
Median
11.74%
Q1
6.08%
Min
-4.39%

EMR’s Return on Equity of 13.06% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GD

17.99%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
37.11%
Q3
20.14%
Median
11.72%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-6.24%

GD’s Return on Equity of 17.99% is on par with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EMR vs. GD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

14.92%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.60%
Q3
10.26%
Median
5.83%
Q1
2.92%
Min
-0.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.92% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GD

8.13%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.66%
Q3
8.61%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.92%
Min
1.01%

GD’s Net Profit Margin of 8.13% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EMR vs. GD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EMR

17.42%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.24%
Q3
14.53%
Median
7.97%
Q1
3.45%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.42% places EMR in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GD

10.30%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
22.35%
Q3
12.83%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.38%
Min
-2.15%

GD’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.30% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EMR vs. GD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolEMRGD
Return on Equity (TTM)13.06%17.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.19%7.21%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.92%8.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.42%10.30%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)52.70%15.40%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.85

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.09
Median
1.48
Q1
1.09
Min
0.85

EMR’s Current Ratio of 0.85 falls into the lower quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GD

1.36

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
2.03
Median
1.24
Q1
1.04
Min
0.77

GD’s Current Ratio of 1.36 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EMR vs. GD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

0.72

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
0.96
Median
0.57
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

EMR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.72 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GD

0.37

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
0.96
Median
0.63
Q1
0.37
Min
0.03

Falling into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, GD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

EMR vs. GD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EMR

18.57

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
44.15
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
0.98
Min
-19.47

EMR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 18.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GD

15.01

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.08
Median
7.25
Q1
2.65
Min
-7.63

GD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.01 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EMR vs. GD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolEMRGD
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.851.36
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.630.83
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.720.37
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)18.5715.01

Growth

Revenue Growth

EMR vs. GD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EMR vs. GD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EMR

1.62%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.04%
Q3
1.58%
Median
1.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.62%, EMR offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

GD

1.72%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.72%
Q3
1.45%
Median
0.48%
Q1
0.08%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.72%, GD offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

EMR vs. GD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EMR

45.06%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
165.68%
Q3
71.84%
Median
38.15%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.06% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GD

38.28%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
50.43%
Median
17.11%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

GD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.28% is within the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EMR vs. GD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolEMRGD
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.62%1.72%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)45.06%38.28%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EMR

27.79

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
65.02
Q3
38.99
Median
27.41
Q1
19.88
Min
8.37

EMR’s P/E Ratio of 27.79 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GD

22.29

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
67.20
Q3
55.74
Median
33.28
Q1
27.49
Min
15.02

In the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, GD’s P/E Ratio of 22.29 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

EMR vs. GD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EMR

4.15

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
7.01
Q3
4.03
Median
1.79
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

EMR’s P/S Ratio of 4.15 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GD

1.81

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
4.87
Median
2.47
Q1
1.61
Min
0.33

GD’s P/S Ratio of 1.81 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

EMR vs. GD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EMR

3.77

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
10.97
Q3
5.57
Median
3.50
Q1
1.66
Min
0.64

EMR’s P/B Ratio of 3.77 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

GD

3.32

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.90
Q3
8.93
Median
4.70
Q1
3.03
Min
0.83

GD’s P/B Ratio of 3.32 is within the conventional range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EMR vs. GD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolEMRGD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.7922.29
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.151.81
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.773.32
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.8920.64