EMR vs. FLS: Emerson Electric vs. Flowserve Stock Comparison
How do Emerson Electric (EMR) and Flowserve (FLS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Emerson Electric (EMR) and Flowserve (FLS) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but EMR is classified in Electrical Equipment while FLS is classified in Machinery.
| Profile Item | EMR | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Emerson Electric Co. | Flowserve Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Electrical Equipment | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Electrical Components & Equipment | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 90.56 billion USD | 10.19 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 1, 1972 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | EMR | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 34.39% | 24.11% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 28.46% | 33.68% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 14.17% | 22.48% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | EMR | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 32.47% | 42.18% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.20 | 1.24 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -29.61% | -38.76% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.61M | 1.61M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | EMR | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.93 | 0.47 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.37 | 0.70 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Emerson Electric (EMR) at 13.12% and Flowserve (FLS) at 11.61% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EMR
Capital Goods industry group
13.12%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- EMR
- 13.12%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
11.61%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- FLS
- 11.61%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Emerson Electric (EMR) at 14.18% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Flowserve (FLS) at 5.42%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
EMR
Capital Goods industry group
14.18%
- Max
- 27.47%
- EMR
- 14.18%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
5.42%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- FLS
- 5.42%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Emerson Electric (EMR) at 25.90% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Flowserve (FLS) at 13.45%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
EMR
Capital Goods industry group
25.90%
- Max
- 36.60%
- EMR
- 25.90%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
13.45%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- FLS
- 13.45%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | EMR | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 13.12% | 11.61% |
| ROA (TTM) | 5.98% | 6.36% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 14.18% | 5.42% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 25.90% | 13.45% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 53.36% | 35.30% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Only one side can be read here: Flowserve (FLS) reports revenue growth of 3.76%, ranked against its industry; Emerson Electric (EMR) has no revenue growth figure this period.
EPS Growth
Both Emerson Electric (EMR) at 18.56% and Flowserve (FLS) at 23.36% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | EMR | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -- | 3.76% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 9.37% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 18.56% | 23.36% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -40.62% | 22.39% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Flowserve (FLS) at 2.10 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Emerson Electric (EMR) at 0.94 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for EMR.
EMR
Capital Goods industry group
0.94
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- EMR
- 0.94
- Min
- 0.36
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
2.10
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- FLS
- 2.10
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Emerson Electric (EMR) at 0.59 and Flowserve (FLS) at 0.95 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
EMR
Capital Goods industry group
0.59
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- EMR
- 0.59
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
0.95
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- FLS
- 0.95
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | EMR | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.94 | 2.10 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.59 | 0.95 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.89 | 2.08 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Emerson Electric (EMR) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Flowserve (FLS) reports a yield of 1.11%, ranking against industry peers normally.
EMR
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- EMR
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
1.11%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- FLS
- 1.11%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Emerson Electric (EMR) at 48.51% and Flowserve (FLS) at 43.50% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.
EMR
Capital Goods industry group
48.51%
- Max
- 67.39%
- EMR
- 48.51%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
43.50%
- Max
- 67.39%
- FLS
- 43.50%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | EMR | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.11% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 48.51% | 43.50% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Emerson Electric (EMR) at 33.89 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Flowserve (FLS) at 40.19 sits in the richer quartile — FLS needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
EMR
Capital Goods industry group
33.89
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- EMR
- 33.89
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
40.19
- Max
- 59.38
- FLS
- 40.19
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Flowserve (FLS) at 2.17 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Emerson Electric (EMR) at 4.77 sits in the pricier quartile — EMR costs more per dollar of sales.
EMR
Capital Goods industry group
4.77
- Max
- 7.54
- EMR
- 4.77
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
2.17
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- FLS
- 2.17
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Emerson Electric (EMR) at 4.38 and Flowserve (FLS) at 4.40 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
EMR
Capital Goods industry group
4.38
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- EMR
- 4.38
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
4.40
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- FLS
- 4.40
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | EMR | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 33.89 | 40.19 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.77 | 2.17 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.38 | 4.40 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.85% | 3.62% |