EME vs. POOL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 5, 2025

Here’s a clear look at EME and POOL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	EME	POOL
Company Name	EMCOR Group, Inc.	Pool Corporation
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Construction & Engineering	Distributors
Market Capitalization	29.29 billion USD	11.55 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	January 10, 1995	October 13, 1995
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of EME and POOL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

EME vs. POOL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	EME	POOL
5-Day Price Return	2.15%	-0.41%
13-Week Price Return	19.59%	2.51%
26-Week Price Return	77.04%	-2.75%
52-Week Price Return	52.23%	-16.94%
Month-to-Date Return	0.75%	-0.15%
Year-to-Date Return	44.17%	-9.19%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.44M	0.43M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.53M	0.58M
3-Month Volatility	28.48%	32.15%
Beta	1.18	1.25

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

EME

37.80%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 26.79%
Q3: 16.47%
Median: 10.66%
Q1: 8.46%
Min: -1.86%

EME’s Return on Equity of 37.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

POOL

31.34%

Distributors Industry

Max: 35.43%
Q3: 27.95%
Median: 14.57%
Q1: 11.23%
Min: 11.19%

In the upper quartile for the Distributors industry, POOL’s Return on Equity of 31.34% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

EME vs. POOL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

EME

7.07%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 11.67%
Q3: 6.13%
Median: 3.82%
Q1: 2.31%
Min: -2.77%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.07% places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

POOL

7.79%

Distributors Industry

Max: 5.68%
Q3: 5.68%
Median: 5.36%
Q1: 4.87%
Min: 4.81%

POOL’s Net Profit Margin of 7.79% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Distributors industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

EME vs. POOL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

EME

9.50%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 17.78%
Q3: 9.61%
Median: 6.19%
Q1: 3.73%
Min: -1.78%

EME’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.50% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

POOL

11.13%

Distributors Industry

Max: 11.13%
Q3: 7.77%
Median: 5.57%
Q1: 5.27%
Min: 4.95%

An Operating Profit Margin of 11.13% places POOL in the upper quartile for the Distributors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

EME vs. POOL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	EME	POOL
Return on Equity (TTM)	37.80%	31.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)	14.03%	11.64%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	7.07%	7.79%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	9.50%	11.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	19.49%	29.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

EME

1.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.17
Q3: 1.50
Median: 1.23
Q1: 1.00
Min: 0.65

EME’s Current Ratio of 1.18 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

POOL

2.52

Distributors Industry

Max: 1.81
Q3: 1.66
Median: 1.21
Q1: 1.15
Min: 1.09

POOL’s Current Ratio of 2.52 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Distributors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

EME vs. POOL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

EME

0.08

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.37
Q3: 1.24
Median: 0.62
Q1: 0.31
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, EME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

POOL

0.95

Distributors Industry

Max: 1.19
Q3: 1.00
Median: 0.81
Q1: 0.52
Min: 0.46

POOL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.95 is typical for the Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EME vs. POOL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

EME

490.27

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 36.37
Q3: 17.88
Median: 8.20
Q1: 4.98
Min: -6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 490.27, EME demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

POOL

12.28

Distributors Industry

Max: 13.15
Q3: 10.84
Median: 5.59
Q1: 4.01
Min: 3.80

POOL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.28 is in the upper quartile for the Distributors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

EME vs. POOL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	EME	POOL
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.18	2.52
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.13	0.82
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.08	0.95
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	490.27	12.28

Growth

Revenue Growth

EME vs. POOL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

EME vs. POOL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

EME

0.16%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 5.80%
Q3: 3.33%
Median: 2.22%
Q1: 0.21%
Min: 0.00%

EME’s Dividend Yield of 0.16% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

POOL

1.58%

Distributors Industry

Max: 48.14%
Q3: 37.24%
Median: 4.28%
Q1: 3.20%
Min: 1.61%

POOL’s Dividend Yield of 1.58% is below the typical range for the Distributors industry. This indicates that shareholder returns are likely driven more by potential capital appreciation than by dividend income.

EME vs. POOL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EME

4.14%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 139.17%
Q3: 74.39%
Median: 51.48%
Q1: 15.67%
Min: 0.00%

EME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4.14% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

POOL

44.67%

Distributors Industry

Max: 903.92%
Q3: 695.25%
Median: 56.97%
Q1: 44.33%
Min: 26.53%

POOL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.67% is within the typical range for the Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

EME vs. POOL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	EME	POOL
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.16%	1.58%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	4.14%	44.67%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

EME

26.58

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 41.00
Q3: 26.91
Median: 16.02
Q1: 13.49
Min: 1.65

EME’s P/E Ratio of 26.58 is within the middle range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

POOL

28.31

Distributors Industry

Max: 27.78
Q3: 22.45
Median: 18.78
Q1: 12.95
Min: 5.82

At 28.31, POOL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Distributors industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

EME vs. POOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

EME

1.88

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.93
Q3: 1.65
Median: 0.71
Q1: 0.45
Min: 0.11

EME’s P/S Ratio of 1.88 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

POOL

2.20

Distributors Industry

Max: 1.07
Q3: 1.07
Median: 0.94
Q1: 0.62
Min: 0.28

With a P/S Ratio of 2.20, POOL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Distributors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

EME vs. POOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

EME

7.85

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 7.96
Q3: 4.06
Median: 1.98
Q1: 1.23
Min: 0.24

EME’s P/B Ratio of 7.85 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

POOL

8.44

Distributors Industry

Max: 3.58
Q3: 3.46
Median: 3.12
Q1: 2.75
Min: 2.63

At 8.44, POOL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Distributors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

EME vs. POOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	EME	POOL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	26.58	28.31
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.88	2.20
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	7.85	8.44
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	24.31	23.97