EME vs. FLS: EMCOR vs. Flowserve Stock Comparison
How do EMCOR (EME) and Flowserve (FLS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
EMCOR (EME) and Flowserve (FLS) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but EME is classified in Construction & Engineering while FLS is classified in Machinery.
| Profile Item | EME | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | EMCOR Group, Inc. | Flowserve Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Construction & Engineering | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Construction & Engineering | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 26.64 billion USD | 10.19 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 10, 1995 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | EME | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 0.07% | 24.11% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 46.16% | 33.68% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 38.01% | 22.48% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | EME | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 43.79% | 42.18% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.17 | 1.24 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -36.85% | -38.76% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 402.73K | 1.61M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | EME | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.10 | 0.47 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.14 | 0.70 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
EMCOR (EME) at 40.55% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Flowserve (FLS) at 11.61% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for EME.
EME
Capital Goods industry group
40.55%
- EME
- 40.55%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
11.61%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- FLS
- 11.61%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both EMCOR (EME) at 7.78% and Flowserve (FLS) at 5.42% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
EME
Capital Goods industry group
7.78%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- EME
- 7.78%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
5.42%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- FLS
- 5.42%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both EMCOR (EME) at 10.46% and Flowserve (FLS) at 13.45% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
EME
Capital Goods industry group
10.46%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- EME
- 10.46%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
13.45%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- FLS
- 13.45%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | EME | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 40.55% | 11.61% |
| ROA (TTM) | 12.33% | 6.36% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 7.78% | 5.42% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 10.46% | 13.45% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 19.59% | 35.30% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both EMCOR (EME) at 16.62% and Flowserve (FLS) at 3.76% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
EMCOR (EME) at 30.99% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Flowserve (FLS) at 23.36% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for EME.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | EME | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 16.62% | 3.76% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 15.32% | 9.37% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 30.99% | 23.36% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 51.54% | 22.39% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Flowserve (FLS) at 2.10 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while EMCOR (EME) at 1.17 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for EME.
EME
Capital Goods industry group
1.17
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- EME
- 1.17
- Min
- 0.36
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
2.10
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- FLS
- 2.10
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
EMCOR (EME) at 0.13 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Flowserve (FLS) at 0.95 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
EME
Capital Goods industry group
0.13
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- EME
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
0.95
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- FLS
- 0.95
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | EME | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.17 | 2.10 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.13 | 0.95 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.10 | 2.08 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both EMCOR (EME) at 0.07% and Flowserve (FLS) at 1.11% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
EME
Capital Goods industry group
0.07%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- EME
- 0.07%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
1.11%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- FLS
- 1.11%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
EMCOR (EME) at 4.19% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Flowserve (FLS) at 43.50% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
EME
Capital Goods industry group
4.19%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- EME
- 4.19%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
43.50%
- Max
- 67.39%
- FLS
- 43.50%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | EME | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.07% | 1.11% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 4.19% | 43.50% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
EMCOR (EME) at 17.59 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Flowserve (FLS) at 40.19 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.
EME
Capital Goods industry group
17.59
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- EME
- 17.59
- Min
- 3.03
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
40.19
- Max
- 59.38
- FLS
- 40.19
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both EMCOR (EME) at 1.34 and Flowserve (FLS) at 2.17 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
EME
Capital Goods industry group
1.34
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- EME
- 1.34
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
2.17
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- FLS
- 2.17
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Flowserve (FLS) at 4.40 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while EMCOR (EME) at 6.26 carries an above-peer premium to book — EME is pricier on assets.
EME
Capital Goods industry group
6.26
- Max
- 9.66
- EME
- 6.26
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
FLS
Capital Goods industry group
4.40
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- FLS
- 4.40
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | EME | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 17.59 | 40.19 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.34 | 2.17 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.26 | 4.40 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.82% | 3.62% |