Seek Returns logo

ELF vs. PG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at ELF and PG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolELFPG
Company Namee.l.f. Beauty, Inc.The Procter & Gamble Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryPersonal Care ProductsHousehold Products
Market Capitalization4.46 billion USD340.77 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 22, 2016January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ELF and PG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ELF vs. PG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolELFPG
5-Day Price Return-7.94%1.49%
13-Week Price Return-36.83%-4.33%
26-Week Price Return-6.01%-6.97%
52-Week Price Return-40.22%-11.35%
Month-to-Date Return-39.82%-1.80%
Year-to-Date Return-41.45%-11.92%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.31M9.01M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.20M7.52M
3-Month Volatility86.94%14.43%
Beta1.800.39

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ELF

9.43%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
33.29%
Q3
19.04%
Median
10.69%
Q1
3.43%
Min
-10.59%

ELF’s Return on Equity of 9.43% is on par with the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PG

32.09%

Household Products Industry

Max
173.33%
Q3
128.99%
Median
18.47%
Q1
9.92%
Min
-6.34%

PG’s Return on Equity of 32.09% is on par with the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ELF vs. PG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ELF

5.90%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
14.65%
Q3
11.09%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.24%
Min
-0.14%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, ELF’s Net Profit Margin of 5.90% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

PG

19.74%

Household Products Industry

Max
14.68%
Q3
12.48%
Median
9.30%
Q1
8.70%
Min
5.05%

PG’s Net Profit Margin of 19.74% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

ELF vs. PG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ELF

9.75%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.64%
Q3
16.48%
Median
13.50%
Q1
8.68%
Min
2.98%

ELF’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.75% is around the midpoint for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PG

24.13%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.46%
Q3
16.57%
Median
14.01%
Q1
12.86%
Min
12.78%

PG’s Operating Profit Margin of 24.13% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

ELF vs. PG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolELFPG
Return on Equity (TTM)9.43%32.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.32%13.45%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.90%19.74%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.75%24.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)70.27%51.23%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ELF

2.70

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.54
Median
1.54
Q1
1.16
Min
0.76

ELF’s Current Ratio of 2.70 is in the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PG

0.71

Household Products Industry

Max
2.79
Q3
1.98
Median
1.21
Q1
0.76
Min
0.50

PG’s Current Ratio of 0.71 falls into the lower quartile for the Household Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ELF vs. PG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ELF

0.75

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.80
Q3
0.78
Median
0.41
Q1
0.07
Min
0.00

ELF’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.75 is typical for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PG

0.67

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.49
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

PG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Household Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ELF vs. PG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ELF

11.53

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
54.83
Median
21.36
Q1
7.77
Min
-3.28

ELF’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PG

47.04

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
17.34
Q1
9.99
Min
5.60

PG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 47.04 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ELF vs. PG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolELFPG
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.700.71
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.330.46
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.750.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.5347.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

ELF vs. PG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ELF vs. PG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ELF

0.00%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
5.39%
Q3
3.35%
Median
1.73%
Q1
0.82%
Min
0.00%

ELF currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PG

2.93%

Household Products Industry

Max
5.56%
Q3
3.53%
Median
3.05%
Q1
2.11%
Min
1.42%

PG’s Dividend Yield of 2.93% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ELF vs. PG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ELF

0.00%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
221.40%
Q3
122.35%
Median
68.48%
Q1
44.97%
Min
0.00%

ELF has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PG

59.51%

Household Products Industry

Max
189.95%
Q3
111.93%
Median
74.93%
Q1
56.30%
Min
30.76%

PG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.51% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ELF vs. PG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolELFPG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.93%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%59.51%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ELF

53.42

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
45.79
Q3
29.79
Median
22.62
Q1
17.33
Min
0.00

At 53.42, ELF’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

PG

20.34

Household Products Industry

Max
31.74
Q3
25.68
Median
20.54
Q1
14.94
Min
14.20

PG’s P/E Ratio of 20.34 is within the middle range for the Household Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ELF vs. PG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ELF

3.15

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
2.43
Median
1.96
Q1
1.34
Min
0.00

ELF’s P/S Ratio of 3.15 is in the upper echelon for the Personal Care Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PG

4.01

Household Products Industry

Max
4.24
Q3
2.79
Median
1.94
Q1
1.34
Min
1.04

PG’s P/S Ratio of 4.01 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ELF vs. PG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Personal Care Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ELF

6.60

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
12.00
Q3
6.22
Median
2.92
Q1
1.78
Min
0.97

ELF’s P/B Ratio of 6.60 is in the upper tier for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PG

6.75

Household Products Industry

Max
46.10
Q3
20.24
Median
5.19
Q1
2.28
Min
1.41

PG’s P/B Ratio of 6.75 is within the conventional range for the Household Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ELF vs. PG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Personal Care Products and Household Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolELFPG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)53.4220.34
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.154.01
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.606.75
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)27.0222.81