EL vs. PG: Estée Lauder vs. Procter & Gamble Stock Comparison
How do Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG) both fall under the Household & Personal Products industry group, but EL is classified in Personal Care Products while PG is classified in Household Products.
| Profile Item | EL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Name | The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. Class A Common Stock | Procter & Gamble Co. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Staples | Consumer Staples |
| GICS Industry Group | Household & Personal Products | Household & Personal Products |
| GICS Industry | Personal Care Products | Household Products |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Personal Care Products | Household Products |
| Market Capitalization | 37.58 billion USD | 340.13 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 17, 1995 | January 2, 1962 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | EL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 20.44% | -5.30% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -12.12% | 0.85% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -19.98% | 2.94% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | EL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 48.39% | 19.67% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.27 | 0.39 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -85.82% | -23.77% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.20M | 8.96M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | EL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.34 | -0.48 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.48 | -0.68 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Estée Lauder (EL) at 4.75% and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 30.29% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EL
Household & Personal Products industry group
4.75%
- Max
- 42.18%
- Q3
- 31.08%
- Median
- 15.58%
- EL
- 4.75%
- Q1
- 4.60%
- Min
- -28.58%
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
30.29%
- Max
- 42.18%
- Q3
- 31.08%
- PG
- 30.29%
- Median
- 15.58%
- Q1
- 4.60%
- Min
- -28.58%
Net Margin (TTM)
Procter & Gamble (PG) at 18.44% keeps a top-quartile share of each sales dollar as profit, while Estée Lauder (EL) at 1.21% keeps a bottom-quartile share.
EL
Household & Personal Products industry group
1.21%
- Max
- 18.44%
- Q3
- 11.35%
- Median
- 7.28%
- Q1
- 2.73%
- EL
- 1.21%
- Min
- -4.15%
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
18.44%
- PG
- 18.44%
- Max
- 18.44%
- Q3
- 11.35%
- Median
- 7.28%
- Q1
- 2.73%
- Min
- -4.15%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Procter & Gamble (PG) at 22.09% carries a top-quartile operating margin, while Estée Lauder (EL) at 7.00% operates in the bottom quartile.
EL
Household & Personal Products industry group
7.00%
- Max
- 23.94%
- Q3
- 19.00%
- Median
- 14.26%
- Q1
- 9.75%
- EL
- 7.00%
- Min
- -2.44%
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
22.09%
- Max
- 23.94%
- PG
- 22.09%
- Q3
- 19.00%
- Median
- 14.26%
- Q1
- 9.75%
- Min
- -2.44%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | EL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 4.75% | 30.29% |
| ROA (TTM) | 5.23% | 10.72% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 1.21% | 18.44% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 7.00% | 22.09% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 75.49% | 50.87% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Estée Lauder (EL) at 5.05% and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 3.26% sit in the top peer quartile for revenue growth, so each is growing its top line faster than typical industry peers.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Procter & Gamble (PG) reports EPS growth of 1.69%, ranked against its industry; Estée Lauder (EL) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | EL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 5.05% | 3.26% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -1.84% | 2.00% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | 1.69% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -43.62% | 3.91% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Estée Lauder (EL) at 1.22 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Procter & Gamble (PG) at 0.68 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PG.
EL
Household & Personal Products industry group
1.22
- Max
- 4.06
- Q3
- 3.07
- Median
- 1.80
- EL
- 1.22
- Q1
- 1.01
- Min
- 0.66
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
0.68
- Max
- 4.06
- Q3
- 3.07
- Median
- 1.80
- Q1
- 1.01
- PG
- 0.68
- Min
- 0.66
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Procter & Gamble (PG) at 0.64 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Estée Lauder (EL) at 2.43 uses more debt funding than most peers.
EL
Household & Personal Products industry group
2.43
- Max
- 3.49
- EL
- 2.43
- Q3
- 1.90
- Median
- 0.81
- Q1
- 0.47
- Min
- 0.06
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
0.64
- Max
- 3.49
- Q3
- 1.90
- Median
- 0.81
- PG
- 0.64
- Q1
- 0.47
- Min
- 0.06
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | EL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.22 | 0.68 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 2.43 | 0.64 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.34 | 1.01 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Estée Lauder (EL) at 1.39% and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 2.90% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
EL
Household & Personal Products industry group
1.39%
- Max
- 5.81%
- Q3
- 2.90%
- EL
- 1.39%
- Median
- 1.39%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
2.90%
- Max
- 5.81%
- PG
- 2.90%
- Q3
- 2.90%
- Median
- 1.39%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Estée Lauder (EL) reports payout ratio above 100% at 280.00%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Procter & Gamble (PG) reports 64.33%, ranking against industry peers normally.
EL
Household & Personal Products industry group
280.00%
- EL
- 280.00%
- Max
- 103.12%
- Q3
- 82.28%
- Median
- 56.44%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
64.33%
- Max
- 103.12%
- Q3
- 82.28%
- PG
- 64.33%
- Median
- 56.44%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | EL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.39% | 2.90% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 280.00% | 64.33% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Procter & Gamble (PG) at 22.12 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Estée Lauder (EL) at 207.72 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for EL’s trailing earnings.
EL
Household & Personal Products industry group
207.72
- EL
- 207.72
- Max
- 34.95
- Q3
- 27.48
- Median
- 21.76
- Q1
- 17.41
- Min
- 7.32
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
22.12
- Max
- 34.95
- Q3
- 27.48
- PG
- 22.12
- Median
- 21.76
- Q1
- 17.41
- Min
- 7.32
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Estée Lauder (EL) at 2.50 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Procter & Gamble (PG) at 3.91 sits in the pricier quartile — PG costs more per dollar of sales.
EL
Household & Personal Products industry group
2.50
- Max
- 4.73
- Q3
- 3.36
- EL
- 2.50
- Median
- 2.10
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.25
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
3.91
- Max
- 4.73
- PG
- 3.91
- Q3
- 3.36
- Median
- 2.10
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.25
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Estée Lauder (EL) at 9.87 and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 6.38 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
EL
Household & Personal Products industry group
9.87
- Max
- 19.95
- EL
- 9.87
- Q3
- 9.87
- Median
- 4.29
- Q1
- 1.49
- Min
- -2.73
PG
Household & Personal Products industry group
6.38
- Max
- 19.95
- Q3
- 9.87
- PG
- 6.38
- Median
- 4.29
- Q1
- 1.49
- Min
- -2.73
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | EL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 207.72 | 22.12 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.50 | 3.91 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 9.87 | 6.38 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.82% | 3.90% |