Seek Returns

EL vs. PG: Estée Lauder vs. Procter & Gamble Stock Comparison

How do Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG) both fall under the Household & Personal Products industry group, but EL is classified in Personal Care Products while PG is classified in Household Products.

Company profile comparison for Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG)
Profile ItemELPG
NameThe Estée Lauder Companies Inc. Class AProcter & Gamble Co
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS Industry GroupHousehold & Personal ProductsHousehold & Personal Products
GICS IndustryPersonal Care ProductsHousehold Products
GICS Sub-IndustryPersonal Care ProductsHousehold Products
Market Capitalization29.80 billion USD344.87 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 17, 1995January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

EL
PG
GSPC
Loading price history…
Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG)
MetricELPG
Total Return (1Y)-2.86%-2.39%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)-21.44%1.32%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)-22.76%3.86%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

EL
PG
GSPC
Loading price history…
Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG)
MetricELPG
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)46.56%19.70%
Beta (5Y)1.260.38
Max Drawdown (5Y)-85.82%-23.77%
Avg. Volume (3M)3.48M8.97M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
EL and PG are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG)
MetricELPG
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.15-0.33
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.20-0.47

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Estée Lauder (EL) reports a negative ROE of -5.95%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Procter & Gamble (PG) reports 31.11%, ranking against industry peers normally.

EL

Household & Personal Products industry group

-5.95%

Max
33.31%
Q3
28.44%
Median
13.69%
Q1
0.17%
EL
-5.95%
Min
-20.43%

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

31.11%

Max
33.31%
PG
31.11%
Q3
28.44%
Median
13.69%
Q1
0.17%
Min
-20.43%
Loading chart…
Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their ROE against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Estée Lauder (EL) reports a negative net margin of -1.67%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Procter & Gamble (PG) reports 19.16%, ranking against industry peers normally.

EL

Household & Personal Products industry group

-1.67%

Max
19.16%
Q3
11.33%
Median
6.67%
Q1
0.66%
EL
-1.67%
Min
-9.20%

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

19.16%

PG
19.16%
Max
19.16%
Q3
11.33%
Median
6.67%
Q1
0.66%
Min
-9.20%
Loading chart…
Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their net margin against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 23.05% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Estée Lauder (EL) at 14.93%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

EL

Household & Personal Products industry group

14.93%

Max
23.17%
Q3
20.10%
EL
14.93%
Median
12.60%
Q1
6.91%
Min
-9.69%

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

23.05%

Max
23.17%
PG
23.05%
Q3
20.10%
Median
12.60%
Q1
6.91%
Min
-9.69%
Loading chart…
Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their operating margin against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG)
MetricELPG
ROE (TTM)-5.95%31.11%
ROA (TTM)4.87%10.93%
Net Margin (TTM)-1.67%19.16%
Operating Margin (TTM)14.93%23.05%
Gross Margin (TTM)74.65%50.98%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 0.29% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Estée Lauder (EL) at -8.21% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 8.14% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Estée Lauder (EL) at -391.67% falls below its industry range, a notably weak earnings reading.

Loading chart…
Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG)
MetricELPG
Revenue Growth (YoY)-8.21%0.29%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-6.87%1.67%
EPS Growth (YoY)-391.67%8.14%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)--3.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Estée Lauder (EL) at 1.27 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Procter & Gamble (PG) at 0.73 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PG.

EL

Household & Personal Products industry group

1.27

Max
4.51
Q3
3.12
Median
1.95
EL
1.27
Q1
1.01
Min
0.73

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

0.73

Max
4.51
Q3
3.12
Median
1.95
Q1
1.01
PG
0.73
Min
0.73
Loading chart…
Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their current ratio against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 0.68 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Estée Lauder (EL) at 2.33 uses more debt funding than most peers.

EL

Household & Personal Products industry group

2.33

EL
2.33
Max
2.33
Q3
1.45
Median
0.77
Q1
0.39
Min
0.02

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

0.68

Max
2.33
Q3
1.45
Median
0.77
PG
0.68
Q1
0.39
Min
0.02
Loading chart…
Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG)
MetricELPG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.270.73
Debt / Equity (MRQ)2.330.68
Net Debt / EBITDA2.630.99

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 2.83% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Estée Lauder (EL) at 1.67% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, PG the richer one.

EL

Household & Personal Products industry group

1.67%

Max
5.90%
Q3
2.64%
EL
1.67%
Median
1.02%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

2.83%

Max
5.90%
PG
2.83%
Q3
2.64%
Median
1.02%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Estée Lauder (EL) reports payout ratio above 100% at 471.43%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Procter & Gamble (PG) reports 61.80%, ranking against industry peers normally.

EL

Household & Personal Products industry group

471.43%

EL
471.43%
Max
98.51%
Q3
66.00%
Median
36.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

61.80%

Max
98.51%
Q3
66.00%
PG
61.80%
Median
36.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG)
MetricELPG
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.67%2.83%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)471.43%61.80%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Procter & Gamble (PG) trades at 21.78 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Estée Lauder (EL) has no P/E ratio this period.

EL

Household & Personal Products industry group

--

Max
36.52
Q3
24.48
Median
20.82
Q1
15.98
Min
5.38
EL
--

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

21.78

Max
36.52
Q3
24.48
PG
21.78
Median
20.82
Q1
15.98
Min
5.38
Loading chart…
Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): EL does not report P/E ratio, so it has no value marker; PG is benchmarked against the Household & Personal Products industry group.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Estée Lauder (EL) at 2.01 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Procter & Gamble (PG) at 3.98 sits in the pricier quartile — PG costs more per dollar of sales.

EL

Household & Personal Products industry group

2.01

Max
5.42
Q3
2.97
EL
2.01
Median
1.58
Q1
0.70
Min
0.07

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

3.98

Max
5.42
PG
3.98
Q3
2.97
Median
1.58
Q1
0.70
Min
0.07
Loading chart…
Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Estée Lauder (EL) at 7.46 and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 6.42 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

EL

Household & Personal Products industry group

7.46

Max
11.82
Q3
7.46
EL
7.46
Median
2.83
Q1
1.04
Min
-2.96

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

6.42

Max
11.82
Q3
7.46
PG
6.42
Median
2.83
Q1
1.04
Min
-2.96
Loading chart…
Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG)
MetricELPG
P/E Ratio (TTM)--21.78
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.013.98
P/B Ratio (MRQ)7.466.42
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)6.07%3.69%