EL vs. PG: Estée Lauder vs. Procter & Gamble Stock Comparison

June 13, 2026

This page compares Estée Lauder (EL) with Procter & Gamble (PG) using performance and risk, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividends, and valuation metrics.

Performance

Cumulative Growth

Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG). Returns over one year are annualized.

Performance at a Glance

Performance metrics for Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG)
Metric	EL	PG
1-Year Return	30.01%	-5.68%

Risk

Drawdown

Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Risk at a Glance

Risk metrics for Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG)
Metric	EL	PG
1-Year Volatility	48.40%	18.80%
Beta	1.24	0.38
3-Month Avg. Volume	4.44M	9.38M

Company Profile

Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG) both fall under the Household & Personal Products industry group, but EL is classified in Personal Care Products while PG is classified in Household Products.

Company profile comparison for Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG)
Profile Item	EL	PG
Name	The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. Class A	Procter & Gamble Co
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Consumer Staples	Consumer Staples
GICS Industry Group	Household & Personal Products	Household & Personal Products
GICS Industry	Personal Care Products	Household Products
GICS Sub-Industry	Personal Care Products	Household Products
Market Capitalization	32.45 billion USD	348.38 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	November 17, 1995	January 2, 1962
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Procter & Gamble (PG) trades at 21.87 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Estée Lauder (EL) has no P/E ratio this period.

EL

Household & Personal Products industry group

Max: 34.67
Q3: 24.01
Median: 18.98
Q1: 15.21
Min: 5.30
EL: --

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

21.87

Max: 34.67
Q3: 24.01
PG: 21.87
Median: 18.98
Q1: 15.21
Min: 5.30

Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): EL does not report P/E ratio, so it has no value marker; PG is benchmarked against the Household & Personal Products industry group.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

Estée Lauder (EL) at 2.19 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Procter & Gamble (PG) at 4.02 sits in the pricier quartile — PG costs more per dollar of sales.

EL

Household & Personal Products industry group

2.19

Max: 4.71
Q3: 3.01
EL: 2.19
Median: 1.73
Q1: 0.71
Min: 0.24

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

4.02

Max: 4.71
PG: 4.02
Q3: 3.01
Median: 1.73
Q1: 0.71
Min: 0.24

Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 6.48 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Estée Lauder (EL) at 8.13 carries an above-peer premium to book — EL is pricier on assets.

EL

Household & Personal Products industry group

8.13

Max: 13.74
EL: 8.13
Q3: 6.82
Median: 2.19
Q1: 1.22
Min: -2.83

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

6.48

Max: 13.74
Q3: 6.82
PG: 6.48
Median: 2.19
Q1: 1.22
Min: -2.83

Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Valuation metrics for Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG)
Metric	EL	PG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	--	21.87
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.19	4.02
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	8.13	6.48
Free Cash Flow Yield	5.57%	3.66%

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

Estée Lauder (EL) reports a negative ROE of -5.95%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Procter & Gamble (PG) reports 31.11%, ranking against industry peers normally.

EL

Household & Personal Products industry group

-5.95%

Max: 31.30%
Q3: 30.96%
Median: 15.00%
Q1: 1.55%
EL: -5.95%
Min: -13.94%

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

31.11%

Max: 31.30%
PG: 31.11%
Q3: 30.96%
Median: 15.00%
Q1: 1.55%
Min: -13.94%

Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their ROE against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

Estée Lauder (EL) reports a negative net margin of -1.67%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Procter & Gamble (PG) reports 19.16%, ranking against industry peers normally.

EL

Household & Personal Products industry group

-1.67%

Max: 19.16%
Q3: 11.34%
Median: 6.79%
Q1: 2.51%
EL: -1.67%
Min: -9.20%

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

19.16%

PG: 19.16%
Max: 19.16%
Q3: 11.34%
Median: 6.79%
Q1: 2.51%
Min: -9.20%

Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their net margin against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 23.05% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Estée Lauder (EL) at 14.93%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

EL

Household & Personal Products industry group

14.93%

Max: 23.17%
Q3: 19.85%
EL: 14.93%
Median: 12.60%
Q1: 7.57%
Min: -5.14%

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

23.05%

Max: 23.17%
PG: 23.05%
Q3: 19.85%
Median: 12.60%
Q1: 7.57%
Min: -5.14%

Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their operating margin against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Profitability metrics for Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG)
Metric	EL	PG
Return on Equity (TTM)	-5.95%	31.11%
Return on Assets (TTM)	4.87%	10.93%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	-1.67%	19.16%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	14.93%	23.05%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	74.65%	50.98%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

Revenue growth metrics for Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG)
Metric	EL	PG
1-Year Revenue Growth	-8.21%	0.29%
3-Year Revenue CAGR	-6.87%	1.67%

EPS Growth

Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

EPS growth metrics for Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG)
Metric	EL	PG
1-Year EPS Growth	-391.67%	8.14%
3-Year EPS CAGR	--	3.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Estée Lauder (EL) at 1.27 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Procter & Gamble (PG) at 0.73 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PG.

EL

Household & Personal Products industry group

1.27

Max: 6.27
Q3: 3.17
Median: 2.05
EL: 1.27
Q1: 1.00
Min: 0.73

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

0.73

Max: 6.27
Q3: 3.17
Median: 2.05
Q1: 1.00
PG: 0.73
Min: 0.73

Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their current ratio against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

Procter & Gamble (PG) at 0.68 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Estée Lauder (EL) at 2.33 uses more debt funding than most peers.

EL

Household & Personal Products industry group

2.33

EL: 2.33
Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.61
Median: 0.81
Q1: 0.40
Min: 0.02

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

0.68

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.61
Median: 0.81
PG: 0.68
Q1: 0.40
Min: 0.02

Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Financial strength metrics for Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG)
Metric	EL	PG
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.27	0.73
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	2.33	0.68
Net Debt / EBITDA	2.63	0.99

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Estée Lauder (EL) at 1.56% and Procter & Gamble (PG) at 2.85% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

EL

Household & Personal Products industry group

1.56%

Max: 5.93%
Q3: 2.99%
EL: 1.56%
Median: 1.56%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

2.85%

Max: 5.93%
Q3: 2.99%
PG: 2.85%
Median: 1.56%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Estée Lauder (EL) reports payout ratio above 100% at 471.43%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Procter & Gamble (PG) reports 61.80%, ranking against industry peers normally.

EL

Household & Personal Products industry group

471.43%

EL: 471.43%
Max: 98.51%
Q3: 71.90%
Median: 37.08%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PG

Household & Personal Products industry group

61.80%

Max: 98.51%
Q3: 71.90%
PG: 61.80%
Median: 37.08%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Estée Lauder (EL) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Household & Personal Products industry group benchmark.

Dividends at a Glance

Dividend metrics for Estée Lauder (EL) and Procter & Gamble (PG)
Metric	EL	PG
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.56%	2.85%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	471.43%	61.80%