ED vs. KEP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 10, 2025

Here’s a clear look at ED and KEP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

ED is a standard domestic listing, while KEP trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	ED	KEP
Company Name	Consolidated Edison, Inc.	Korea Electric Power Corporation
Country	United States	South Korea
GICS Sector	Utilities	Utilities
GICS Industry	Multi-Utilities	Electric Utilities
Market Capitalization	36.36 billion USD	16.40 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	January 2, 1962	October 27, 1994
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of ED and KEP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

ED vs. KEP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	ED	KEP
5-Day Price Return	3.27%	-1.93%
13-Week Price Return	0.86%	-1.11%
26-Week Price Return	-10.55%	59.19%
52-Week Price Return	-0.31%	-7.95%
Month-to-Date Return	0.31%	-1.53%
Year-to-Date Return	13.00%	77.06%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.84M	1.73M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.41M	4.35M
3-Month Volatility	14.57%	36.82%
Beta	0.38	0.28

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

ED

8.47%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 20.00%
Q3: 13.79%
Median: 9.45%
Q1: 7.88%
Min: 4.56%

ED’s Return on Equity of 8.47% is on par with the norm for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

KEP

15.57%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max: 25.46%
Q3: 14.70%
Median: 10.64%
Q1: 6.99%
Min: 0.02%

In the upper quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s Return on Equity of 15.57% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

ED vs. KEP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

ED

11.98%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 23.49%
Q3: 14.79%
Median: 9.24%
Q1: 4.19%
Min: -1.05%

ED’s Net Profit Margin of 11.98% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Multi-Utilities industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

KEP

6.78%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max: 29.56%
Q3: 16.54%
Median: 11.20%
Q1: 7.30%
Min: 0.01%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s Net Profit Margin of 6.78% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

ED vs. KEP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

ED

17.45%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 45.01%
Q3: 26.69%
Median: 19.18%
Q1: 7.66%
Min: -0.18%

ED’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.45% is around the midpoint for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

KEP

12.54%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max: 38.77%
Q3: 25.54%
Median: 18.87%
Q1: 14.12%
Min: 0.02%

KEP’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.54% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

ED vs. KEP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	ED	KEP
Return on Equity (TTM)	8.47%	15.57%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.75%	2.56%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	11.98%	6.78%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	17.45%	12.54%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	46.69%	-19.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ED

1.10

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 1.35
Q3: 1.10
Median: 0.95
Q1: 0.82
Min: 0.48

ED’s Current Ratio of 1.10 is in the upper quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

KEP

0.46

Electric Utilities Industry

Max: 1.82
Q3: 1.23
Median: 0.98
Q1: 0.72
Min: 0.13

KEP’s Current Ratio of 0.46 falls into the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ED vs. KEP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ED

1.12

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 3.03
Q3: 2.00
Median: 1.55
Q1: 1.24
Min: 0.58

Falling into the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry, ED’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.12 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

KEP

3.18

Electric Utilities Industry

Max: 3.72
Q3: 1.90
Median: 1.27
Q1: 0.62
Min: 0.00

KEP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Electric Utilities industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.18. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

ED vs. KEP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

ED

3.23

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 9.98
Q3: 5.96
Median: 3.48
Q1: 2.74
Min: 0.59

ED’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.23 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Multi-Utilities industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

KEP

2.57

Electric Utilities Industry

Max: 18.68
Q3: 9.89
Median: 3.33
Q1: 2.62
Min: -3.31

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.57 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ED vs. KEP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	ED	KEP
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.10	0.46
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.94	0.29
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	1.12	3.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	3.23	2.57

Growth

Revenue Growth

ED vs. KEP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

ED vs. KEP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

ED

3.12%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 10.02%
Q3: 5.84%
Median: 4.22%
Q1: 2.96%
Min: 0.00%

ED’s Dividend Yield of 3.12% is consistent with its peers in the Multi-Utilities industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

KEP

1.12%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max: 6.61%
Q3: 4.66%
Median: 3.55%
Q1: 2.23%
Min: 0.00%

KEP’s Dividend Yield of 1.12% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ED vs. KEP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ED

58.24%

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 161.38%
Q3: 101.19%
Median: 73.21%
Q1: 58.41%
Min: 31.93%

ED’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 58.24% is in the lower quartile for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

KEP

6.37%

Electric Utilities Industry

Max: 140.33%
Q3: 84.46%
Median: 60.94%
Q1: 31.83%
Min: 0.00%

KEP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.37% is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

ED vs. KEP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	ED	KEP
Dividend Yield (TTM)	3.12%	1.12%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	58.24%	6.37%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

ED

18.67

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 27.93
Q3: 20.57
Median: 15.98
Q1: 9.34
Min: 5.25

ED’s P/E Ratio of 18.67 is within the middle range for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

KEP

3.60

Electric Utilities Industry

Max: 34.39
Q3: 21.23
Median: 15.47
Q1: 10.17
Min: 3.08

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s P/E Ratio of 3.60 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ED vs. KEP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

ED

2.24

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 5.00
Q3: 3.46
Median: 1.80
Q1: 0.46
Min: 0.26

ED’s P/S Ratio of 2.24 aligns with the market consensus for the Multi-Utilities industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KEP

0.24

Electric Utilities Industry

Max: 6.03
Q3: 3.06
Median: 1.89
Q1: 1.06
Min: 0.00

In the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry, KEP’s P/S Ratio of 0.24 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ED vs. KEP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ED

1.52

Multi-Utilities Industry

Max: 2.52
Q3: 2.12
Median: 1.55
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.91

ED’s P/B Ratio of 1.52 is within the conventional range for the Multi-Utilities industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

KEP

0.59

Electric Utilities Industry

Max: 2.97
Q3: 1.86
Median: 1.46
Q1: 1.01
Min: 0.27

KEP’s P/B Ratio of 0.59 is in the lower quartile for the Electric Utilities industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

ED vs. KEP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Multi-Utilities and Electric Utilities industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	ED	KEP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	18.67	3.60
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.24	0.24
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.52	0.59
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	46.01	4.73