Seek Returns

ED vs. KEP: Consolidated Edison vs. Korea Electric Power Stock Comparison

How do Consolidated Edison (ED) and Korea Electric Power (KEP) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Consolidated Edison (ED) and Korea Electric Power (KEP) both fall under the Utilities industry group, but ED is classified in Multi-Utilities while KEP is classified in Electric Utilities.

Consolidated Edison (ED) trades as ordinary local shares, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Korea Electric Power (KEP)
Profile ItemEDKEP
NameConsolidated Edison Inc.Korea Electric Power Corporation Sponsored ADR
Country/RegionUnited StatesSouth Korea
GICS SectorUtilitiesUtilities
GICS Industry GroupUtilitiesUtilities
GICS IndustryMulti-UtilitiesElectric Utilities
GICS Sub-IndustryMulti-UtilitiesElectric Utilities
Market Capitalization44.00 billion USD14.38 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962October 27, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

ED
KEP
GSPC
Loading price history…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Korea Electric Power (KEP). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Korea Electric Power (KEP). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Korea Electric Power (KEP)
MetricEDKEP
Total Return (1Y)24.62%-25.98%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)13.82%20.85%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)12.66%2.90%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

ED
KEP
GSPC
Loading price history…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Korea Electric Power (KEP). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Korea Electric Power (KEP)
MetricEDKEP
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)17.94%46.68%
Beta (5Y)0.230.97
Max Drawdown (5Y)-22.03%-55.55%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.21M949.70K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
ED and KEP are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Korea Electric Power (KEP)
MetricEDKEP
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.13-0.65
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.74-0.93

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 16.60% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Consolidated Edison (ED) at 9.10% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for KEP.

ED

Utilities industry group

9.10%

Max
17.99%
Q3
12.01%
Median
9.44%
ED
9.10%
Q1
7.56%
Min
2.17%

KEP

Utilities industry group

16.60%

Max
17.99%
KEP
16.60%
Q3
12.01%
Median
9.44%
Q1
7.56%
Min
2.17%
Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their ROE against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Consolidated Edison (ED) at 12.70% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 8.04% retains only a bottom-quartile share.

ED

Utilities industry group

12.70%

Max
28.78%
Q3
17.30%
Median
12.73%
ED
12.70%
Q1
9.18%
Min
-0.20%

KEP

Utilities industry group

8.04%

Max
28.78%
Q3
17.30%
Median
12.73%
Q1
9.18%
KEP
8.04%
Min
-0.20%
Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their net margin against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Consolidated Edison (ED) at 26.28% runs core operations around its industry’s norm, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 4.73% operates in the bottom quartile.

ED

Utilities industry group

26.28%

Max
53.83%
Q3
31.12%
ED
26.28%
Median
23.62%
Q1
15.45%
Min
-4.90%

KEP

Utilities industry group

4.73%

Max
53.83%
Q3
31.12%
Median
23.62%
Q1
15.45%
KEP
4.73%
Min
-4.90%
Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their operating margin against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Korea Electric Power (KEP)
MetricEDKEP
ROE (TTM)9.10%16.60%
ROA (TTM)3.33%3.04%
Net Margin (TTM)12.70%8.04%
Operating Margin (TTM)26.28%4.73%
Gross Margin (TTM)53.72%15.97%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Consolidated Edison (ED) at 10.89% and Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 4.31% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 144.73% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Consolidated Edison (ED) at 7.63%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Korea Electric Power (KEP)
MetricEDKEP
Revenue Growth (YoY)10.89%4.31%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)2.59%11.03%
EPS Growth (YoY)7.63%144.73%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)6.57%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Consolidated Edison (ED) at 1.18 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 0.44 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

ED

Utilities industry group

1.18

Max
1.90
ED
1.18
Q3
1.17
Median
0.88
Q1
0.66
Min
0.29

KEP

Utilities industry group

0.44

Max
1.90
Q3
1.17
Median
0.88
Q1
0.66
KEP
0.44
Min
0.29
Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their current ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Consolidated Edison (ED) at 1.06 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 2.63 uses more debt funding than most peers.

ED

Utilities industry group

1.06

Max
2.63
Q3
1.77
Median
1.35
ED
1.06
Q1
0.84
Min
0.00

KEP

Utilities industry group

2.63

KEP
2.63
Max
2.63
Q3
1.77
Median
1.35
Q1
0.84
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Korea Electric Power (KEP)
MetricEDKEP
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.180.44
Debt / Equity (MRQ)1.062.63
Net Debt / EBITDA4.425.13

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Consolidated Edison (ED) at 2.89% pays an industry-typical yield; Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 13,891.89% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

ED

Utilities industry group

2.89%

Max
6.66%
Q3
3.58%
ED
2.89%
Median
2.85%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%

KEP

Utilities industry group

13,891.89%

KEP
13,891.89%
Max
6.66%
Q3
3.58%
Median
2.85%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Consolidated Edison (ED) at 56.38% keeps its payout within the industry’s typical band; Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 12.22% pays out less than peers usually do, retaining more of its earnings — a policy difference more than a quality gap.

ED

Utilities industry group

56.38%

Max
113.04%
Q3
68.72%
ED
56.38%
Median
56.38%
Q1
32.38%
Min
0.00%

KEP

Utilities industry group

12.22%

Max
113.04%
Q3
68.72%
Median
56.38%
Q1
32.38%
KEP
12.22%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Korea Electric Power (KEP)
MetricEDKEP
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.89%13,891.89%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)56.38%12.22%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 2.66 trades below its industry P/E ratio range, while Consolidated Edison (ED) at 19.03 is closer to a normal peer multiple — a clearer earnings-valuation discount for KEP, subject to growth and earnings quality.

ED

Utilities industry group

19.03

Max
31.22
Q3
23.30
Median
19.64
ED
19.03
Q1
15.17
Min
3.34

KEP

Utilities industry group

2.66

Max
31.22
Q3
23.30
Median
19.64
Q1
15.17
Min
3.34
KEP
2.66
Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 0.00 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Consolidated Edison (ED) at 2.43 prices around its industry’s middle — KEP costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

ED

Utilities industry group

2.43

Max
6.35
Q3
3.63
Median
2.63
ED
2.43
Q1
1.52
Min
0.00

KEP

Utilities industry group

0.00

Max
6.35
Q3
3.63
Median
2.63
Q1
1.52
KEP
0.00
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 0.38 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Consolidated Edison (ED) at 1.67 is valued near its industry’s middle — KEP is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

ED

Utilities industry group

1.67

Max
3.12
Q3
2.21
Median
1.83
ED
1.67
Q1
1.46
Min
0.34

KEP

Utilities industry group

0.38

Max
3.12
Q3
2.21
Median
1.83
Q1
1.46
KEP
0.38
Min
0.34
Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Korea Electric Power (KEP): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Korea Electric Power (KEP)
MetricEDKEP
P/E Ratio (TTM)19.032.66
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.430.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.670.38
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)-3.05%4,799.31%