ED vs. KEP: Consolidated Edison vs. Korea Electric Power Stock Comparison
How do Consolidated Edison (ED) and Korea Electric Power (KEP) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Consolidated Edison (ED) and Korea Electric Power (KEP) both fall under the Utilities industry group, but ED is classified in Multi-Utilities while KEP is classified in Electric Utilities.
Consolidated Edison (ED) trades as ordinary local shares, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | ED | KEP |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Consolidated Edison Inc. | Korea Electric Power Corporation Sponsored ADR |
| Country/Region | United States | South Korea |
| GICS Sector | Utilities | Utilities |
| GICS Industry Group | Utilities | Utilities |
| GICS Industry | Multi-Utilities | Electric Utilities |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Multi-Utilities | Electric Utilities |
| Market Capitalization | 44.00 billion USD | 14.38 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 2, 1962 | October 27, 1994 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ED | KEP |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 24.62% | -25.98% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 13.82% | 20.85% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 12.66% | 2.90% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | ED | KEP |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 17.94% | 46.68% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.23 | 0.97 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -22.03% | -55.55% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.21M | 949.70K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ED | KEP |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.13 | -0.65 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.74 | -0.93 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 16.60% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Consolidated Edison (ED) at 9.10% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for KEP.
ED
Utilities industry group
9.10%
- Max
- 17.99%
- Q3
- 12.01%
- Median
- 9.44%
- ED
- 9.10%
- Q1
- 7.56%
- Min
- 2.17%
KEP
Utilities industry group
16.60%
- Max
- 17.99%
- KEP
- 16.60%
- Q3
- 12.01%
- Median
- 9.44%
- Q1
- 7.56%
- Min
- 2.17%
Net Margin (TTM)
Consolidated Edison (ED) at 12.70% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 8.04% retains only a bottom-quartile share.
ED
Utilities industry group
12.70%
- Max
- 28.78%
- Q3
- 17.30%
- Median
- 12.73%
- ED
- 12.70%
- Q1
- 9.18%
- Min
- -0.20%
KEP
Utilities industry group
8.04%
- Max
- 28.78%
- Q3
- 17.30%
- Median
- 12.73%
- Q1
- 9.18%
- KEP
- 8.04%
- Min
- -0.20%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Consolidated Edison (ED) at 26.28% runs core operations around its industry’s norm, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 4.73% operates in the bottom quartile.
ED
Utilities industry group
26.28%
- Max
- 53.83%
- Q3
- 31.12%
- ED
- 26.28%
- Median
- 23.62%
- Q1
- 15.45%
- Min
- -4.90%
KEP
Utilities industry group
4.73%
- Max
- 53.83%
- Q3
- 31.12%
- Median
- 23.62%
- Q1
- 15.45%
- KEP
- 4.73%
- Min
- -4.90%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ED | KEP |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 9.10% | 16.60% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.33% | 3.04% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 12.70% | 8.04% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 26.28% | 4.73% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 53.72% | 15.97% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Consolidated Edison (ED) at 10.89% and Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 4.31% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 144.73% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Consolidated Edison (ED) at 7.63%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ED | KEP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 10.89% | 4.31% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 2.59% | 11.03% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 7.63% | 144.73% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 6.57% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Consolidated Edison (ED) at 1.18 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 0.44 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.
ED
Utilities industry group
1.18
- Max
- 1.90
- ED
- 1.18
- Q3
- 1.17
- Median
- 0.88
- Q1
- 0.66
- Min
- 0.29
KEP
Utilities industry group
0.44
- Max
- 1.90
- Q3
- 1.17
- Median
- 0.88
- Q1
- 0.66
- KEP
- 0.44
- Min
- 0.29
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Consolidated Edison (ED) at 1.06 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 2.63 uses more debt funding than most peers.
ED
Utilities industry group
1.06
- Max
- 2.63
- Q3
- 1.77
- Median
- 1.35
- ED
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.84
- Min
- 0.00
KEP
Utilities industry group
2.63
- KEP
- 2.63
- Max
- 2.63
- Q3
- 1.77
- Median
- 1.35
- Q1
- 0.84
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ED | KEP |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.18 | 0.44 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.06 | 2.63 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.42 | 5.13 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Consolidated Edison (ED) at 2.89% pays an industry-typical yield; Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 13,891.89% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
ED
Utilities industry group
2.89%
- Max
- 6.66%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- ED
- 2.89%
- Median
- 2.85%
- Q1
- 0.66%
- Min
- 0.00%
KEP
Utilities industry group
13,891.89%
- KEP
- 13,891.89%
- Max
- 6.66%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 2.85%
- Q1
- 0.66%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Consolidated Edison (ED) at 56.38% keeps its payout within the industry’s typical band; Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 12.22% pays out less than peers usually do, retaining more of its earnings — a policy difference more than a quality gap.
ED
Utilities industry group
56.38%
- Max
- 113.04%
- Q3
- 68.72%
- ED
- 56.38%
- Median
- 56.38%
- Q1
- 32.38%
- Min
- 0.00%
KEP
Utilities industry group
12.22%
- Max
- 113.04%
- Q3
- 68.72%
- Median
- 56.38%
- Q1
- 32.38%
- KEP
- 12.22%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ED | KEP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.89% | 13,891.89% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 56.38% | 12.22% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 2.66 trades below its industry P/E ratio range, while Consolidated Edison (ED) at 19.03 is closer to a normal peer multiple — a clearer earnings-valuation discount for KEP, subject to growth and earnings quality.
ED
Utilities industry group
19.03
- Max
- 31.22
- Q3
- 23.30
- Median
- 19.64
- ED
- 19.03
- Q1
- 15.17
- Min
- 3.34
KEP
Utilities industry group
2.66
- Max
- 31.22
- Q3
- 23.30
- Median
- 19.64
- Q1
- 15.17
- Min
- 3.34
- KEP
- 2.66
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 0.00 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Consolidated Edison (ED) at 2.43 prices around its industry’s middle — KEP costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
ED
Utilities industry group
2.43
- Max
- 6.35
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 2.63
- ED
- 2.43
- Q1
- 1.52
- Min
- 0.00
KEP
Utilities industry group
0.00
- Max
- 6.35
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 2.63
- Q1
- 1.52
- KEP
- 0.00
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 0.38 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Consolidated Edison (ED) at 1.67 is valued near its industry’s middle — KEP is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.
ED
Utilities industry group
1.67
- Max
- 3.12
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.83
- ED
- 1.67
- Q1
- 1.46
- Min
- 0.34
KEP
Utilities industry group
0.38
- Max
- 3.12
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.83
- Q1
- 1.46
- KEP
- 0.38
- Min
- 0.34
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ED | KEP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 19.03 | 2.66 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.43 | 0.00 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.67 | 0.38 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -3.05% | 4,799.31% |