ED vs. FTS: Consolidated Edison vs. Fortis Stock Comparison
How do Consolidated Edison (ED) and Fortis (FTS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Consolidated Edison (ED) and Fortis (FTS) both fall under the Utilities industry group, but ED is classified in Multi-Utilities while FTS is classified in Electric Utilities.
| Profile Item | ED | FTS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Consolidated Edison Inc. | Fortis Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Utilities | Utilities |
| GICS Industry Group | Utilities | Utilities |
| GICS Industry | Multi-Utilities | Electric Utilities |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Multi-Utilities | Electric Utilities |
| Market Capitalization | 44.00 billion USD | 31.00 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 2, 1962 | January 5, 2010 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ED | FTS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 24.62% | 19.13% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 13.82% | 17.59% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 12.66% | 9.53% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | ED | FTS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 17.94% | 14.85% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.23 | 0.40 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -22.03% | -30.13% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.21M | 879.23K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ED | FTS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.13 | 1.00 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.74 | 1.53 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Consolidated Edison (ED) at 9.10% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Fortis (FTS) at 7.55% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.
ED
Utilities industry group
9.10%
- Max
- 17.99%
- Q3
- 12.01%
- Median
- 9.44%
- ED
- 9.10%
- Q1
- 7.56%
- Min
- 2.17%
FTS
Utilities industry group
7.55%
- Max
- 17.99%
- Q3
- 12.01%
- Median
- 9.44%
- Q1
- 7.56%
- FTS
- 7.55%
- Min
- 2.17%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Consolidated Edison (ED) at 12.70% and Fortis (FTS) at 15.01% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
ED
Utilities industry group
12.70%
- Max
- 28.78%
- Q3
- 17.30%
- Median
- 12.73%
- ED
- 12.70%
- Q1
- 9.18%
- Min
- -0.20%
FTS
Utilities industry group
15.01%
- Max
- 28.78%
- Q3
- 17.30%
- FTS
- 15.01%
- Median
- 12.73%
- Q1
- 9.18%
- Min
- -0.20%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Consolidated Edison (ED) at 26.28% and Fortis (FTS) at 30.69% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
ED
Utilities industry group
26.28%
- Max
- 53.83%
- Q3
- 31.12%
- ED
- 26.28%
- Median
- 23.62%
- Q1
- 15.45%
- Min
- -4.90%
FTS
Utilities industry group
30.69%
- Max
- 53.83%
- Q3
- 31.12%
- FTS
- 30.69%
- Median
- 23.62%
- Q1
- 15.45%
- Min
- -4.90%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ED | FTS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 9.10% | 7.55% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.33% | 2.93% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 12.70% | 15.01% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 26.28% | 30.69% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 53.72% | 45.52% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Consolidated Edison (ED) at 10.89% and Fortis (FTS) at 5.75% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Consolidated Edison (ED) at 7.63% and Fortis (FTS) at 4.94% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ED | FTS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 10.89% | 5.75% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 2.59% | 3.29% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 7.63% | 4.94% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 6.57% | 6.94% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Fortis (FTS) at 0.69 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Consolidated Edison (ED) at 1.18 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
ED
Utilities industry group
1.18
- Max
- 1.90
- ED
- 1.18
- Q3
- 1.17
- Median
- 0.88
- Q1
- 0.66
- Min
- 0.29
FTS
Utilities industry group
0.69
- Max
- 1.90
- Q3
- 1.17
- Median
- 0.88
- FTS
- 0.69
- Q1
- 0.66
- Min
- 0.29
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Consolidated Edison (ED) at 1.06 and Fortis (FTS) at 1.35 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
ED
Utilities industry group
1.06
- Max
- 2.63
- Q3
- 1.77
- Median
- 1.35
- ED
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.84
- Min
- 0.00
FTS
Utilities industry group
1.35
- Max
- 2.63
- Q3
- 1.77
- FTS
- 1.35
- Median
- 1.35
- Q1
- 0.84
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ED | FTS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.18 | 0.69 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.06 | 1.35 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.42 | 6.22 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Fortis (FTS) at 4.18% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Consolidated Edison (ED) at 2.89% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, FTS the richer one.
ED
Utilities industry group
2.89%
- Max
- 6.66%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- ED
- 2.89%
- Median
- 2.85%
- Q1
- 0.66%
- Min
- 0.00%
FTS
Utilities industry group
4.18%
- Max
- 6.66%
- FTS
- 4.18%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 2.85%
- Q1
- 0.66%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Consolidated Edison (ED) at 56.38% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Fortis (FTS) at 72.73% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
ED
Utilities industry group
56.38%
- Max
- 113.04%
- Q3
- 68.72%
- ED
- 56.38%
- Median
- 56.38%
- Q1
- 32.38%
- Min
- 0.00%
FTS
Utilities industry group
72.73%
- Max
- 113.04%
- FTS
- 72.73%
- Q3
- 68.72%
- Median
- 56.38%
- Q1
- 32.38%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ED | FTS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.89% | 4.18% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 56.38% | 72.73% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Consolidated Edison (ED) at 19.03 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Fortis (FTS) at 23.66 sits in the richer quartile — FTS needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
ED
Utilities industry group
19.03
- Max
- 31.22
- Q3
- 23.30
- Median
- 19.64
- ED
- 19.03
- Q1
- 15.17
- Min
- 3.34
FTS
Utilities industry group
23.66
- Max
- 31.22
- FTS
- 23.66
- Q3
- 23.30
- Median
- 19.64
- Q1
- 15.17
- Min
- 3.34
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Consolidated Edison (ED) at 2.43 and Fortis (FTS) at 2.47 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
ED
Utilities industry group
2.43
- Max
- 6.35
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 2.63
- ED
- 2.43
- Q1
- 1.52
- Min
- 0.00
FTS
Utilities industry group
2.47
- Max
- 6.35
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 2.63
- FTS
- 2.47
- Q1
- 1.52
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Consolidated Edison (ED) at 1.67 and Fortis (FTS) at 1.79 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
ED
Utilities industry group
1.67
- Max
- 3.12
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.83
- ED
- 1.67
- Q1
- 1.46
- Min
- 0.34
FTS
Utilities industry group
1.79
- Max
- 3.12
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.83
- FTS
- 1.79
- Q1
- 1.46
- Min
- 0.34
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ED | FTS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 19.03 | 23.66 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.43 | 2.47 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.67 | 1.79 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -3.05% | -9.42% |