Seek Returns

ED vs. EMA: Consolidated Edison vs. Emera Stock Comparison

How do Consolidated Edison (ED) and Emera (EMA) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Consolidated Edison (ED) and Emera (EMA) both fall under the Utilities industry group, but ED is classified in Multi-Utilities while EMA is classified in Electric Utilities.

Company profile comparison for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Emera (EMA)
Profile ItemEDEMA
NameConsolidated Edison Inc.Emera Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorUtilitiesUtilities
GICS Industry GroupUtilitiesUtilities
GICS IndustryMulti-UtilitiesElectric Utilities
GICS Sub-IndustryMulti-UtilitiesElectric Utilities
Market Capitalization44.00 billion USD15.62 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962January 5, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

ED
EMA
GSPC
Loading price history…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Emera (EMA), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Emera (EMA). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Emera (EMA). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Emera (EMA)
MetricEDEMA
Total Return (1Y)24.62%9.07%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)13.82%18.64%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)12.66%6.45%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

ED
EMA
GSPC
Loading price history…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Emera (EMA), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Emera (EMA). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Emera (EMA)
MetricEDEMA
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)17.94%16.26%
Beta (5Y)0.230.40
Max Drawdown (5Y)-22.03%-32.61%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.21M713.97K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
ED and EMA are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Emera (EMA)
MetricEDEMA
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.130.29
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.740.43

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Consolidated Edison (ED) at 9.10% and Emera (EMA) at 7.56% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

ED

Utilities industry group

9.10%

Max
17.99%
Q3
12.01%
Median
9.44%
ED
9.10%
Q1
7.56%
Min
2.17%

EMA

Utilities industry group

7.56%

Max
17.99%
Q3
12.01%
Median
9.44%
EMA
7.56%
Q1
7.56%
Min
2.17%
Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Emera (EMA): A comparison of their ROE against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Consolidated Edison (ED) at 12.70% and Emera (EMA) at 11.64% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

ED

Utilities industry group

12.70%

Max
28.78%
Q3
17.30%
Median
12.73%
ED
12.70%
Q1
9.18%
Min
-0.20%

EMA

Utilities industry group

11.64%

Max
28.78%
Q3
17.30%
Median
12.73%
EMA
11.64%
Q1
9.18%
Min
-0.20%
Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Emera (EMA): A comparison of their net margin against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Consolidated Edison (ED) at 26.28% and Emera (EMA) at 17.85% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

ED

Utilities industry group

26.28%

Max
53.83%
Q3
31.12%
ED
26.28%
Median
23.62%
Q1
15.45%
Min
-4.90%

EMA

Utilities industry group

17.85%

Max
53.83%
Q3
31.12%
Median
23.62%
EMA
17.85%
Q1
15.45%
Min
-4.90%
Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Emera (EMA): A comparison of their operating margin against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Emera (EMA)
MetricEDEMA
ROE (TTM)9.10%7.56%
ROA (TTM)3.33%2.91%
Net Margin (TTM)12.70%11.64%
Operating Margin (TTM)26.28%17.85%
Gross Margin (TTM)53.72%43.76%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Emera (EMA) at 21.89% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Consolidated Edison (ED) at 10.89% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for EMA.

Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Emera (EMA): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Emera (EMA) at 97.66% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Consolidated Edison (ED) at 7.63%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Emera (EMA): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Emera (EMA)
MetricEDEMA
Revenue Growth (YoY)10.89%21.89%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)2.59%4.97%
EPS Growth (YoY)7.63%97.66%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)6.57%-1.62%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Emera (EMA) at 0.73 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Consolidated Edison (ED) at 1.18 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

ED

Utilities industry group

1.18

Max
1.90
ED
1.18
Q3
1.17
Median
0.88
Q1
0.66
Min
0.29

EMA

Utilities industry group

0.73

Max
1.90
Q3
1.17
Median
0.88
EMA
0.73
Q1
0.66
Min
0.29
Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Emera (EMA): A comparison of their current ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Consolidated Edison (ED) at 1.06 and Emera (EMA) at 1.54 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

ED

Utilities industry group

1.06

Max
2.63
Q3
1.77
Median
1.35
ED
1.06
Q1
0.84
Min
0.00

EMA

Utilities industry group

1.54

Max
2.63
Q3
1.77
EMA
1.54
Median
1.35
Q1
0.84
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Emera (EMA): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Emera (EMA)
MetricEDEMA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.180.73
Debt / Equity (MRQ)1.061.54
Net Debt / EBITDA4.426.38

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Emera (EMA) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Consolidated Edison (ED) reports a yield of 2.89%, ranking against industry peers normally.

ED

Utilities industry group

2.89%

Max
6.66%
Q3
3.58%
ED
2.89%
Median
2.85%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%

EMA

Utilities industry group

0.00%

Max
6.66%
Q3
3.58%
Median
2.85%
Q1
0.66%
EMA
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Emera (EMA): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Consolidated Edison (ED) at 56.38% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Emera (EMA) at 92.48% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

ED

Utilities industry group

56.38%

Max
113.04%
Q3
68.72%
ED
56.38%
Median
56.38%
Q1
32.38%
Min
0.00%

EMA

Utilities industry group

92.48%

Max
113.04%
EMA
92.48%
Q3
68.72%
Median
56.38%
Q1
32.38%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Emera (EMA): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Emera (EMA)
MetricEDEMA
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.89%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)56.38%92.48%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Consolidated Edison (ED) at 19.03 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Emera (EMA) at 23.58 sits in the richer quartile — EMA needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

ED

Utilities industry group

19.03

Max
31.22
Q3
23.30
Median
19.64
ED
19.03
Q1
15.17
Min
3.34

EMA

Utilities industry group

23.58

Max
31.22
EMA
23.58
Q3
23.30
Median
19.64
Q1
15.17
Min
3.34
Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Emera (EMA): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Consolidated Edison (ED) at 2.43 and Emera (EMA) at 1.75 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

ED

Utilities industry group

2.43

Max
6.35
Q3
3.63
Median
2.63
ED
2.43
Q1
1.52
Min
0.00

EMA

Utilities industry group

1.75

Max
6.35
Q3
3.63
Median
2.63
EMA
1.75
Q1
1.52
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Emera (EMA): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Consolidated Edison (ED) at 1.67 and Emera (EMA) at 1.80 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

ED

Utilities industry group

1.67

Max
3.12
Q3
2.21
Median
1.83
ED
1.67
Q1
1.46
Min
0.34

EMA

Utilities industry group

1.80

Max
3.12
Q3
2.21
Median
1.83
EMA
1.80
Q1
1.46
Min
0.34
Loading chart…
Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Emera (EMA): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Utilities industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Consolidated Edison (ED) and Emera (EMA)
MetricEDEMA
P/E Ratio (TTM)19.0323.58
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.431.75
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.671.80
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)-3.05%-9.18%