Seek Returns

DINO vs. WMB: HF Sinclair vs. Williams Stock Comparison

How do HF Sinclair (DINO) and Williams (WMB) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

HF Sinclair (DINO) and Williams (WMB) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though DINO is classified under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing while WMB falls under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.

Company profile comparison for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Williams (WMB)
Profile ItemDINOWMB
NameHF Sinclair CorporationThe Williams Companies, Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Refining & MarketingOil & Gas Storage & Transportation
Market Capitalization16.45 billion USD80.11 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980December 31, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

DINO
WMB
GSPC
Loading price history…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Williams (WMB), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Williams (WMB). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Williams (WMB). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Williams (WMB)
MetricDINOWMB
Total Return (1Y)90.18%14.81%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)29.39%28.70%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)28.64%23.72%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

DINO
WMB
GSPC
Loading price history…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Williams (WMB), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Williams (WMB). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Williams (WMB)
MetricDINOWMB
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)41.52%26.38%
Beta (5Y)0.760.65
Max Drawdown (5Y)-57.35%-23.01%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.52M7.88M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
DINO and WMB are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Williams (WMB)
MetricDINOWMB
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)2.070.40
Sortino Ratio (1Y)3.060.56

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 33.21% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Williams (WMB) at 18.31% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for DINO.

DINO

Energy industry group

33.21%

Max
53.85%
DINO
33.21%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

WMB

Energy industry group

18.31%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
WMB
18.31%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Williams (WMB) at 24.66% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.13%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

DINO

Energy industry group

10.13%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
DINO
10.13%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

WMB

Energy industry group

24.66%

Max
56.92%
WMB
24.66%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 25.13% and Williams (WMB) at 32.69% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

DINO

Energy industry group

25.13%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
DINO
25.13%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

WMB

Energy industry group

32.69%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
WMB
32.69%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Williams (WMB)
MetricDINOWMB
ROE (TTM)33.21%18.31%
ROA (TTM)15.77%4.59%
Net Margin (TTM)10.13%24.66%
Operating Margin (TTM)25.13%32.69%
Gross Margin (TTM)18.01%63.05%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at -5.99% and Williams (WMB) at 13.78% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 238.46% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Williams (WMB) at 17.58%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Williams (WMB)
MetricDINOWMB
Revenue Growth (YoY)-5.99%13.78%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-11.07%2.91%
EPS Growth (YoY)238.46%17.58%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-40.03%8.62%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.27 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Williams (WMB) at 0.75 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

DINO

Energy industry group

2.27

Max
3.64
DINO
2.27
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

WMB

Energy industry group

0.75

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
WMB
0.75
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Williams (WMB) at 1.58 sits in the higher-leverage quartile.

DINO

Energy industry group

0.29

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
DINO
0.29
Min
0.00

WMB

Energy industry group

1.58

Max
1.75
WMB
1.58
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Williams (WMB)
MetricDINOWMB
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.270.75
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.291.58
Net Debt / EBITDA0.014.58

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.07% and Williams (WMB) at 3.23% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

DINO

Energy industry group

2.07%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
DINO
2.07%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WMB

Energy industry group

3.23%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
WMB
3.23%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.32% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Williams (WMB) at 81.69% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

DINO

Energy industry group

10.32%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
DINO
10.32%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

WMB

Energy industry group

81.69%

Max
133.24%
WMB
81.69%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Williams (WMB)
MetricDINOWMB
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.07%3.23%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)10.32%81.69%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 4.95 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Williams (WMB) at 25.23 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

DINO

Energy industry group

4.95

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
DINO
4.95
Min
2.99

WMB

Energy industry group

25.23

Max
39.54
WMB
25.23
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.47 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Williams (WMB) at 6.32 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.

DINO

Energy industry group

0.47

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
DINO
0.47
Min
0.00

WMB

Energy industry group

6.32

WMB
6.32
Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 1.43 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Williams (WMB) at 5.11 prices above its benchmark range — WMB looks rich relative to book.

DINO

Energy industry group

1.43

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
DINO
1.43
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

WMB

Energy industry group

5.11

WMB
5.11
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Williams (WMB): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Williams (WMB)
MetricDINOWMB
P/E Ratio (TTM)4.9525.23
P/S Ratio (TTM)0.476.32
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.435.11
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)18.17%-3.56%