DINO vs. TPL: HF Sinclair vs. Texas Pacific Land Stock Comparison
How do HF Sinclair (DINO) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
HF Sinclair (DINO) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though DINO is classified under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing while TPL falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.
| Profile Item | DINO | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Name | HF Sinclair Corporation | Texas Pacific Land Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 16.45 billion USD | 18.79 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | DINO | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 90.18% | -14.10% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 29.39% | 16.13% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 28.64% | 13.42% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | DINO | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 41.52% | 49.74% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.76 | 0.62 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -57.35% | -52.50% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.52M | 380.93K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | DINO | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 2.07 | -0.37 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 3.06 | -0.50 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 33.21% and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 37.07% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
DINO
Energy industry group
33.21%
- Max
- 53.85%
- DINO
- 33.21%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
TPL
Energy industry group
37.07%
- Max
- 53.85%
- TPL
- 37.07%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 60.71% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.13% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.
DINO
Energy industry group
10.13%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- DINO
- 10.13%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
TPL
Energy industry group
60.71%
- TPL
- 60.71%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 76.20% turns sales into operating profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while HF Sinclair (DINO) at 25.13% operates around its industry’s norm.
DINO
Energy industry group
25.13%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- DINO
- 25.13%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
TPL
Energy industry group
76.20%
- TPL
- 76.20%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | DINO | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 33.21% | 37.07% |
| ROA (TTM) | 15.77% | 26.08% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.13% | 60.71% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 25.13% | 76.20% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 18.01% | 94.09% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at -5.99% and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 13.09% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 238.46% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 6.04%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | DINO | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -5.99% | 13.09% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -11.07% | 6.15% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 238.46% | 6.04% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -40.03% | 2.78% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.27 and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 5.41 post current ratio above their industries’ typical mid-ranges — short-term liquidity appears comfortable, though unusually high readings can point to idle current assets.
DINO
Energy industry group
2.27
- Max
- 3.64
- DINO
- 2.27
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
TPL
Energy industry group
5.41
- TPL
- 5.41
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.29 and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 0.01 keep leverage in the lower quartile of their industries, with less balance-sheet debt relative to equity than most peers.
DINO
Energy industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- DINO
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
TPL
Energy industry group
0.01
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- TPL
- 0.01
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | DINO | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.27 | 5.41 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.29 | 0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.01 | -0.44 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.07% and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 0.86% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
DINO
Energy industry group
2.07%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- DINO
- 2.07%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TPL
Energy industry group
0.86%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- TPL
- 0.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.32% and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 27.42% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
DINO
Energy industry group
10.32%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- DINO
- 10.32%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TPL
Energy industry group
27.42%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- TPL
- 27.42%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | DINO | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.07% | 0.86% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 10.32% | 27.42% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 4.95 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 32.00 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.
DINO
Energy industry group
4.95
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- DINO
- 4.95
- Min
- 2.99
TPL
Energy industry group
32.00
- Max
- 39.54
- TPL
- 32.00
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.47 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 19.41 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.
DINO
Energy industry group
0.47
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- DINO
- 0.47
- Min
- 0.00
TPL
Energy industry group
19.41
- TPL
- 19.41
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 1.43 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 10.42 prices above its benchmark range — TPL looks rich relative to book.
DINO
Energy industry group
1.43
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- DINO
- 1.43
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
TPL
Energy industry group
10.42
- TPL
- 10.42
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | DINO | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 4.95 | 32.00 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.47 | 19.41 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.43 | 10.42 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 18.17% | 0.43% |