DINO vs. PBA: HF Sinclair vs. Pembina Pipeline Stock Comparison
How do HF Sinclair (DINO) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
HF Sinclair (DINO) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though DINO is classified under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing while PBA falls under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.
| Profile Item | DINO | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Name | HF Sinclair Corporation | Pembina Pipeline Corp. |
| Country/Region | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation |
| Market Capitalization | 16.45 billion USD | 28.08 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | October 6, 2010 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | DINO | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 90.18% | 35.84% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 29.39% | 20.26% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 28.64% | 12.46% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | DINO | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 41.52% | 20.43% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.76 | 0.59 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -57.35% | -27.37% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.52M | 993.87K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | DINO | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 2.07 | 1.54 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 3.06 | 2.32 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 33.21% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 12.10% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for DINO.
DINO
Energy industry group
33.21%
- Max
- 53.85%
- DINO
- 33.21%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
PBA
Energy industry group
12.10%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- PBA
- 12.10%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 24.78% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.13%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
DINO
Energy industry group
10.13%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- DINO
- 10.13%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
PBA
Energy industry group
24.78%
- Max
- 56.92%
- PBA
- 24.78%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 25.13% and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 32.63% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
DINO
Energy industry group
25.13%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- DINO
- 25.13%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
PBA
Energy industry group
32.63%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- PBA
- 32.63%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | DINO | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 33.21% | 12.10% |
| ROA (TTM) | 15.77% | 4.65% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.13% | 24.78% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 25.13% | 32.63% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 18.01% | 38.23% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at -5.99% and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 5.34% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 238.46% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at -11.33%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | DINO | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -5.99% | 5.34% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -11.07% | -12.50% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 238.46% | -11.33% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -40.03% | -19.61% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.27 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 0.75 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.
DINO
Energy industry group
2.27
- Max
- 3.64
- DINO
- 2.27
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
PBA
Energy industry group
0.75
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- PBA
- 0.75
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 0.80 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
DINO
Energy industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- DINO
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
PBA
Energy industry group
0.80
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- PBA
- 0.80
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | DINO | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.27 | 0.75 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.29 | 0.80 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.01 | 3.74 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 6.13% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.07% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, PBA the richer one.
DINO
Energy industry group
2.07%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- DINO
- 2.07%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PBA
Energy industry group
6.13%
- Max
- 8.57%
- PBA
- 6.13%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.32% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 86.79% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
DINO
Energy industry group
10.32%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- DINO
- 10.32%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PBA
Energy industry group
86.79%
- Max
- 133.24%
- PBA
- 86.79%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | DINO | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.07% | 6.13% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 10.32% | 86.79% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 4.95 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 20.12 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for DINO, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
DINO
Energy industry group
4.95
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- DINO
- 4.95
- Min
- 2.99
PBA
Energy industry group
20.12
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- PBA
- 20.12
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.47 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 3.36 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.
DINO
Energy industry group
0.47
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- DINO
- 0.47
- Min
- 0.00
PBA
Energy industry group
3.36
- Max
- 5.40
- PBA
- 3.36
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 1.43 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 2.55 carries an above-peer premium to book — PBA is pricier on assets.
DINO
Energy industry group
1.43
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- DINO
- 1.43
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
PBA
Energy industry group
2.55
- Max
- 4.21
- PBA
- 2.55
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | DINO | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 4.95 | 20.12 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.47 | 3.36 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.43 | 2.55 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 18.17% | 5.53% |