DINO vs. IMO: HF Sinclair vs. Imperial Oil Stock Comparison
How do HF Sinclair (DINO) and Imperial Oil (IMO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
HF Sinclair (DINO) and Imperial Oil (IMO) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though DINO is classified under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing while IMO falls under Integrated Oil & Gas.
| Profile Item | DINO | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Name | HF Sinclair Corporation | Imperial Oil Limited |
| Country/Region | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Integrated Oil & Gas |
| Market Capitalization | 16.45 billion USD | 58.92 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE American |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | DINO | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 90.18% | 35.68% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 29.39% | 34.62% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 28.64% | 32.18% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | DINO | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 41.52% | 30.00% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.76 | 0.58 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -57.35% | -29.72% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.52M | 573.33K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | DINO | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 2.07 | 1.05 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 3.06 | 1.51 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 33.21% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 25.24% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
DINO
Energy industry group
33.21%
- Max
- 53.85%
- DINO
- 33.21%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
IMO
Energy industry group
25.24%
- Max
- 53.85%
- IMO
- 25.24%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.13% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 10.88% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
DINO
Energy industry group
10.13%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- DINO
- 10.13%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
IMO
Energy industry group
10.88%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- IMO
- 10.88%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 25.13% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 21.36% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
DINO
Energy industry group
25.13%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- DINO
- 25.13%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
IMO
Energy industry group
21.36%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- IMO
- 21.36%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | DINO | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 33.21% | 25.24% |
| ROA (TTM) | 15.77% | 10.93% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.13% | 10.88% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 25.13% | 21.36% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 18.01% | 20.08% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
HF Sinclair (DINO) at -5.99% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at -7.42% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 238.46% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Imperial Oil (IMO) at -28.24%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | DINO | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -5.99% | -7.42% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -11.07% | -7.56% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 238.46% | -28.24% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -40.03% | -17.26% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.30 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.27 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
DINO
Energy industry group
2.27
- Max
- 3.64
- DINO
- 2.27
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
IMO
Energy industry group
1.30
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- IMO
- 1.30
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.29 and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 0.17 keep leverage in the lower quartile of their industries, with less balance-sheet debt relative to equity than most peers.
DINO
Energy industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- DINO
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
IMO
Energy industry group
0.17
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- IMO
- 0.17
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | DINO | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.27 | 1.30 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.29 | 0.17 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.01 | 0.13 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.07% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 2.65% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
DINO
Energy industry group
2.07%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- DINO
- 2.07%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IMO
Energy industry group
2.65%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- IMO
- 2.65%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.32% and Imperial Oil (IMO) at 26.49% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
DINO
Energy industry group
10.32%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- DINO
- 10.32%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IMO
Energy industry group
26.49%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- IMO
- 26.49%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | DINO | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.07% | 2.65% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 10.32% | 26.49% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 4.95 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at 13.78 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for DINO, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
DINO
Energy industry group
4.95
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- DINO
- 4.95
- Min
- 2.99
IMO
Energy industry group
13.78
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- IMO
- 13.78
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.47 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Imperial Oil (IMO) at 1.06 prices around its industry’s middle — DINO costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
DINO
Energy industry group
0.47
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- DINO
- 0.47
- Min
- 0.00
IMO
Energy industry group
1.06
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- IMO
- 1.06
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 1.43 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Imperial Oil (IMO) at 3.38 carries an above-peer premium to book — IMO is pricier on assets.
DINO
Energy industry group
1.43
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- DINO
- 1.43
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
IMO
Energy industry group
3.38
- Max
- 4.21
- IMO
- 3.38
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | DINO | IMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 4.95 | 13.78 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.47 | 1.06 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.43 | 3.38 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 18.17% | 9.90% |