DINO vs. EQT: HF Sinclair vs. EQT Stock Comparison
How do HF Sinclair (DINO) and EQT (EQT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
HF Sinclair (DINO) and EQT (EQT) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though DINO is classified under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing while EQT falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.
| Profile Item | DINO | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Name | HF Sinclair Corporation | EQT Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 16.45 billion USD | 30.90 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | DINO | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 90.18% | -12.42% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 29.39% | 9.89% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 28.64% | 21.61% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | DINO | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 41.52% | 30.02% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.76 | 0.70 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -57.35% | -42.56% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.52M | 7.75M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | DINO | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 2.07 | -0.56 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 3.06 | -0.80 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 33.21% sits in the top ROE quartile, while EQT (EQT) at 10.49% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for DINO.
DINO
Energy industry group
33.21%
- Max
- 53.85%
- DINO
- 33.21%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
EQT
Energy industry group
10.49%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- EQT
- 10.49%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
EQT (EQT) at 29.01% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.13%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
DINO
Energy industry group
10.13%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- DINO
- 10.13%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
EQT
Energy industry group
29.01%
- Max
- 56.92%
- EQT
- 29.01%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 25.13% and EQT (EQT) at 28.24% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
DINO
Energy industry group
25.13%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- DINO
- 25.13%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
EQT
Energy industry group
28.24%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- EQT
- 28.24%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | DINO | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 33.21% | 10.49% |
| ROA (TTM) | 15.77% | 6.25% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.13% | 29.01% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 25.13% | 28.24% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 18.01% | 80.40% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EQT (EQT) at 59.96% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than HF Sinclair (DINO) at -5.99%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
EPS Growth
Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 238.46% and EQT (EQT) at 635.56% grew per-share earnings faster than their entire industry benchmark ranges for EPS growth — a strong showing on both sides, though a depressed base year can exaggerate the percentage, so the level of earnings matters too.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | DINO | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -5.99% | 59.96% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -11.07% | -11.72% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 238.46% | 635.56% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -40.03% | -8.91% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.27 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while EQT (EQT) at 0.71 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.
DINO
Energy industry group
2.27
- Max
- 3.64
- DINO
- 2.27
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
EQT
Energy industry group
0.71
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- EQT
- 0.71
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.29 and EQT (EQT) at 0.19 keep leverage in the lower quartile of their industries, with less balance-sheet debt relative to equity than most peers.
DINO
Energy industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- DINO
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
EQT
Energy industry group
0.19
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- EQT
- 0.19
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | DINO | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.27 | 0.71 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.29 | 0.19 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.01 | 0.81 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.07% and EQT (EQT) at 1.30% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
DINO
Energy industry group
2.07%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- DINO
- 2.07%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EQT
Energy industry group
1.30%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- EQT
- 1.30%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.32% and EQT (EQT) at 15.64% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
DINO
Energy industry group
10.32%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- DINO
- 10.32%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EQT
Energy industry group
15.64%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- EQT
- 15.64%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | DINO | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.07% | 1.30% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 10.32% | 15.64% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 4.95 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while EQT (EQT) at 11.71 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for DINO, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
DINO
Energy industry group
4.95
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- DINO
- 4.95
- Min
- 2.99
EQT
Energy industry group
11.71
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- EQT
- 11.71
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.47 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while EQT (EQT) at 3.38 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.
DINO
Energy industry group
0.47
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- DINO
- 0.47
- Min
- 0.00
EQT
Energy industry group
3.38
- Max
- 5.40
- EQT
- 3.38
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 1.43 and EQT (EQT) at 1.21 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
DINO
Energy industry group
1.43
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- DINO
- 1.43
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
EQT
Energy industry group
1.21
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- EQT
- 1.21
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | DINO | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 4.95 | 11.71 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.47 | 3.38 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.43 | 1.21 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 18.17% | 8.01% |