DINO vs. DTM: HF Sinclair vs. DT Midstream Stock Comparison
How do HF Sinclair (DINO) and DT Midstream (DTM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
HF Sinclair (DINO) and DT Midstream (DTM) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though DINO is classified under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing while DTM falls under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.
HF Sinclair (DINO) has more than two decades of public-market history since March 17, 1980, whereas DT Midstream (DTM) listed on July 1, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.
| Profile Item | DINO | DTM |
|---|---|---|
| Name | HF Sinclair Corporation | DT Midstream, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation |
| Market Capitalization | 16.45 billion USD | 11.60 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | July 1, 2021 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | DINO | DTM |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 90.18% | 4.08% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 29.39% | 32.58% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 28.64% | 23.68% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | DINO | DTM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 41.52% | 23.13% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.76 | 0.75 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -57.35% | -24.59% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.52M | 983.33K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | DINO | DTM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 2.07 | -0.01 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 3.06 | -0.01 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 33.21% sits in the top ROE quartile, while DT Midstream (DTM) at 9.92% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for DINO.
DINO
Energy industry group
33.21%
- Max
- 53.85%
- DINO
- 33.21%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
DTM
Energy industry group
9.92%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- DTM
- 9.92%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
DT Midstream (DTM) at 35.36% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.13%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
DINO
Energy industry group
10.13%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- DINO
- 10.13%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
DTM
Energy industry group
35.36%
- Max
- 56.92%
- DTM
- 35.36%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
DT Midstream (DTM) at 49.11% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of HF Sinclair (DINO) at 25.13%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
DINO
Energy industry group
25.13%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- DINO
- 25.13%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
DTM
Energy industry group
49.11%
- Max
- 71.31%
- DTM
- 49.11%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | DINO | DTM |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 33.21% | 9.92% |
| ROA (TTM) | 15.77% | 4.05% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.13% | 35.36% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 25.13% | 49.11% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 18.01% | 75.38% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
DT Midstream (DTM) at 26.71% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while HF Sinclair (DINO) at -5.99% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for DTM.
EPS Growth
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 238.46% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than DT Midstream (DTM) at 19.44%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | DINO | DTM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -5.99% | 26.71% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -11.07% | 10.55% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 238.46% | 19.44% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -40.03% | 4.12% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
DT Midstream (DTM) at 1.16 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.27 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
DINO
Energy industry group
2.27
- Max
- 3.64
- DINO
- 2.27
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
DTM
Energy industry group
1.16
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- DTM
- 1.16
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while DT Midstream (DTM) at 0.67 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
DINO
Energy industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- DINO
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
DTM
Energy industry group
0.67
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- DTM
- 0.67
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | DINO | DTM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.27 | 1.16 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.29 | 0.67 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.01 | 3.30 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.07% and DT Midstream (DTM) at 3.07% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
DINO
Energy industry group
2.07%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- DINO
- 2.07%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
DTM
Energy industry group
3.07%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- DTM
- 3.07%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.32% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while DT Midstream (DTM) at 75.38% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
DINO
Energy industry group
10.32%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- DINO
- 10.32%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
DTM
Energy industry group
75.38%
- Max
- 133.24%
- DTM
- 75.38%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | DINO | DTM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.07% | 3.07% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 10.32% | 75.38% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 4.95 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while DT Midstream (DTM) at 24.76 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.
DINO
Energy industry group
4.95
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- DINO
- 4.95
- Min
- 2.99
DTM
Energy industry group
24.76
- Max
- 39.54
- DTM
- 24.76
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.47 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while DT Midstream (DTM) at 8.70 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.
DINO
Energy industry group
0.47
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- DINO
- 0.47
- Min
- 0.00
DTM
Energy industry group
8.70
- DTM
- 8.70
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 1.43 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while DT Midstream (DTM) at 2.41 carries an above-peer premium to book — DTM is pricier on assets.
DINO
Energy industry group
1.43
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- DINO
- 1.43
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
DTM
Energy industry group
2.41
- Max
- 4.21
- DTM
- 2.41
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | DINO | DTM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 4.95 | 24.76 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.47 | 8.70 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.43 | 2.41 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 18.17% | 2.27% |