DECK vs. XPEV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at DECK and XPEV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
DECK is a standard domestic listing, while XPEV trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.
Symbol | DECK | XPEV |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Deckers Outdoor Corporation | XPeng Inc. |
Country | United States | China |
GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
GICS Industry | Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods | Automobiles |
Market Capitalization | 15.66 billion USD | 22.50 billion USD |
Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
Listing Date | October 15, 1993 | August 27, 2020 |
Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of DECK and XPEV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
Symbol | DECK | XPEV |
---|---|---|
5-Day Price Return | -8.86% | 6.52% |
13-Week Price Return | -1.65% | 29.79% |
26-Week Price Return | -14.21% | 17.33% |
52-Week Price Return | -36.41% | 94.58% |
Month-to-Date Return | -15.26% | 1.20% |
Year-to-Date Return | -50.09% | 100.51% |
10-Day Avg. Volume | 2.91M | 7.21M |
3-Month Avg. Volume | 3.48M | 7.50M |
3-Month Volatility | 40.81% | 47.34% |
Beta | 1.13 | 1.04 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
DECK
40.25%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 42.05%
- Q3
- 24.41%
- Median
- 17.18%
- Q1
- 7.87%
- Min
- -8.23%
In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Return on Equity of 40.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
XPEV
-13.77%
Automobiles Industry
- Max
- 28.52%
- Q3
- 12.70%
- Median
- 5.15%
- Q1
- -1.62%
- Min
- -18.19%
XPEV has a negative Return on Equity of -13.77%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
DECK
19.31%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 21.16%
- Q3
- 13.26%
- Median
- 6.06%
- Q1
- 3.93%
- Min
- -3.05%
A Net Profit Margin of 19.31% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
XPEV
-10.15%
Automobiles Industry
- Max
- 8.82%
- Q3
- 5.80%
- Median
- 2.77%
- Q1
- -1.08%
- Min
- -10.15%
XPEV has a negative Net Profit Margin of -10.15%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
DECK
23.64%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 29.47%
- Q3
- 20.87%
- Median
- 11.68%
- Q1
- 6.26%
- Min
- -0.12%
An Operating Profit Margin of 23.64% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
XPEV
-12.08%
Automobiles Industry
- Max
- 13.07%
- Q3
- 6.94%
- Median
- 4.50%
- Q1
- -2.17%
- Min
- -13.85%
XPEV has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -12.08%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.
Profitability at a Glance
Symbol | DECK | XPEV |
---|---|---|
Return on Equity (TTM) | 40.25% | -13.77% |
Return on Assets (TTM) | 26.80% | -5.03% |
Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 19.31% | -10.15% |
Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 23.64% | -12.08% |
Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 57.63% | 16.38% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
DECK
2.94
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 2.94
- Q3
- 2.22
- Median
- 1.61
- Q1
- 1.48
- Min
- 0.74
DECK’s Current Ratio of 2.94 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.
XPEV
1.14
Automobiles Industry
- Max
- 2.13
- Q3
- 1.52
- Median
- 1.29
- Q1
- 1.09
- Min
- 0.47
XPEV’s Current Ratio of 1.14 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
DECK
0.00
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 2.79
- Q3
- 1.32
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.27
- Min
- 0.00
Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
XPEV
0.89
Automobiles Industry
- Max
- 2.07
- Q3
- 1.17
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.05
XPEV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.89 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
DECK
713.03
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 57.00
- Q3
- 32.83
- Median
- 7.87
- Q1
- 3.52
- Min
- -32.49
With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 713.03, DECK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.
XPEV
-19.31
Automobiles Industry
- Max
- 77.87
- Q3
- 37.26
- Median
- 13.42
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- -49.07
XPEV has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -19.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.
Financial Strength at a Glance
Symbol | DECK | XPEV |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.94 | 1.14 |
Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 2.08 | 1.00 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 0.00 | 0.89 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 713.03 | -19.31 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
DECK
0.00%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 5.22%
- Q3
- 3.07%
- Median
- 2.34%
- Q1
- 1.11%
- Min
- 0.00%
DECK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
XPEV
0.00%
Automobiles Industry
- Max
- 10.85%
- Q3
- 4.84%
- Median
- 2.53%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
XPEV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
DECK
0.00%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 156.63%
- Q3
- 94.60%
- Median
- 52.65%
- Q1
- 35.04%
- Min
- 0.00%
DECK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
XPEV
0.00%
Automobiles Industry
- Max
- 131.16%
- Q3
- 60.59%
- Median
- 36.73%
- Q1
- 5.97%
- Min
- 0.00%
XPEV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
Dividend at a Glance
Symbol | DECK | XPEV |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
DECK
15.33
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 48.15
- Q3
- 33.82
- Median
- 20.70
- Q1
- 14.57
- Min
- 7.12
DECK’s P/E Ratio of 15.33 is within the middle range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
XPEV
--
Automobiles Industry
- Max
- 31.95
- Q3
- 22.20
- Median
- 11.17
- Q1
- 7.39
- Min
- 4.54
P/E Ratio data for XPEV is currently unavailable.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
DECK
2.96
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 4.35
- Q3
- 3.06
- Median
- 1.66
- Q1
- 0.83
- Min
- 0.26
DECK’s P/S Ratio of 2.96 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
XPEV
3.24
Automobiles Industry
- Max
- 1.49
- Q3
- 0.92
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.24
- Min
- 0.09
With a P/S Ratio of 3.24, XPEV trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
DECK
6.24
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 9.74
- Q3
- 5.59
- Median
- 3.41
- Q1
- 2.01
- Min
- 0.56
DECK’s P/B Ratio of 6.24 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
XPEV
4.00
Automobiles Industry
- Max
- 2.87
- Q3
- 1.83
- Median
- 0.79
- Q1
- 0.47
- Min
- 0.18
At 4.00, XPEV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.
Valuation at a Glance
Symbol | DECK | XPEV |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 15.33 | -- |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 2.96 | 3.24 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 6.24 | 4.00 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 14.00 | 15.86 |