Seek Returns logo

DECK vs. LULU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at DECK and LULU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolDECKLULU
Company NameDeckers Outdoor Corporationlululemon athletica inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization15.80 billion USD24.03 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 15, 1993July 27, 2007
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DECK and LULU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DECK vs. LULU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolDECKLULU
5-Day Price Return4.50%4.89%
13-Week Price Return-15.55%-34.09%
26-Week Price Return-38.16%-51.32%
52-Week Price Return-30.43%-16.36%
Month-to-Date Return0.29%-0.02%
Year-to-Date Return-47.57%-47.57%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.57M3.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.58M3.04M
3-Month Volatility59.09%53.70%
Beta1.101.10

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DECK

40.25%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Return on Equity of 40.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LULU

43.48%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Return on Equity of 43.48% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

DECK vs. LULU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DECK

19.31%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.31% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LULU

16.82%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.82% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

DECK vs. LULU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DECK

23.64%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.64% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LULU

23.36%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.36% places LULU in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

DECK vs. LULU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolDECKLULU
Return on Equity (TTM)40.25%43.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)26.80%25.05%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)19.31%16.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.64%23.36%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)57.63%59.34%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

2.94

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

DECK’s Current Ratio of 2.94 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

LULU

2.28

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

LULU’s Current Ratio of 2.28 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

DECK vs. LULU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

LULU

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

DECK vs. LULU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DECK

713.03

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 713.03, DECK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

LULU

-47.83

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

LULU has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -47.83. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

DECK vs. LULU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolDECKLULU
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.942.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.080.98
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)713.03-47.83

Growth

Revenue Growth

DECK vs. LULU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DECK vs. LULU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DECK

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

DECK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

LULU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

DECK vs. LULU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DECK

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

DECK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LULU

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

LULU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

DECK vs. LULU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolDECKLULU
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DECK

15.69

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

DECK’s P/E Ratio of 15.69 is within the middle range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LULU

13.38

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, LULU’s P/E Ratio of 13.38 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

DECK vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DECK

3.03

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

DECK’s P/S Ratio of 3.03 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LULU

2.25

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

LULU’s P/S Ratio of 2.25 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

DECK vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

6.24

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

DECK’s P/B Ratio of 6.24 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LULU

7.80

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

LULU’s P/B Ratio of 7.80 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

DECK vs. LULU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolDECKLULU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.6913.38
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.032.25
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.247.80
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.3415.24