Seek Returns logo

DECK vs. KMX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at DECK and KMX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolDECKKMX
Company NameDeckers Outdoor CorporationCarMax, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryTextiles, Apparel & Luxury GoodsSpecialty Retail
Market Capitalization15.66 billion USD6.76 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 15, 1993February 4, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of DECK and KMX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

DECK vs. KMX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolDECKKMX
5-Day Price Return-8.86%-21.35%
13-Week Price Return-1.65%-33.24%
26-Week Price Return-14.21%-40.23%
52-Week Price Return-36.41%-41.97%
Month-to-Date Return-15.26%-26.86%
Year-to-Date Return-50.09%-45.12%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.91M7.42M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.48M3.70M
3-Month Volatility40.81%50.08%
Beta1.131.28

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

DECK

40.25%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
42.05%
Q3
24.41%
Median
17.18%
Q1
7.87%
Min
-8.23%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Return on Equity of 40.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

KMX

8.36%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
64.63%
Q3
37.13%
Median
19.07%
Q1
10.79%
Min
-16.66%

KMX’s Return on Equity of 8.36% is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

DECK vs. KMX: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

DECK

19.31%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
6.06%
Q1
3.93%
Min
-3.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.31% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

KMX

1.98%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
21.04%
Q3
10.99%
Median
6.08%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-4.37%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, KMX’s Net Profit Margin of 1.98% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

DECK vs. KMX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

DECK

23.64%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
11.68%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.12%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.64% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

KMX

2.64%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
33.35%
Q3
16.40%
Median
9.28%
Q1
4.05%
Min
-10.63%

KMX’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.64% is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

DECK vs. KMX: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolDECKKMX
Return on Equity (TTM)40.25%8.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)26.80%1.91%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)19.31%1.98%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.64%2.64%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)57.63%11.21%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

2.94

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
2.22
Median
1.61
Q1
1.48
Min
0.74

DECK’s Current Ratio of 2.94 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

KMX

2.46

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
2.72
Q3
1.81
Median
1.38
Q1
1.15
Min
0.52

KMX’s Current Ratio of 2.46 is in the upper quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

DECK vs. KMX: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

0.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.79
Q3
1.32
Median
0.60
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

KMX

3.00

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
3.44
Q3
1.57
Median
0.60
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

KMX’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Specialty Retail industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.00. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

DECK vs. KMX: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

DECK

713.03

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
32.83
Median
7.87
Q1
3.52
Min
-32.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 713.03, DECK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

KMX

--

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
48.12
Q3
39.12
Median
14.13
Q1
3.63
Min
-36.00

Interest Coverage Ratio data for KMX is currently unavailable.

DECK vs. KMX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolDECKKMX
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.942.46
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.081.06
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.003.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)713.03--

Growth

Revenue Growth

DECK vs. KMX: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

DECK vs. KMX: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

DECK

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.22%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.34%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

DECK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

KMX

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
6.48%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KMX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

DECK vs. KMX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

DECK

0.00%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
94.60%
Median
52.65%
Q1
35.04%
Min
0.00%

DECK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

KMX

0.00%

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
192.64%
Q3
79.43%
Median
26.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

KMX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

DECK vs. KMX: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolDECKKMX
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

DECK

15.33

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
48.15
Q3
33.82
Median
20.70
Q1
14.57
Min
7.12

DECK’s P/E Ratio of 15.33 is within the middle range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

KMX

12.66

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
47.04
Q3
27.74
Median
23.51
Q1
13.77
Min
7.47

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, KMX’s P/E Ratio of 12.66 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

DECK vs. KMX: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

DECK

2.96

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.35
Q3
3.06
Median
1.66
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

DECK’s P/S Ratio of 2.96 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

KMX

0.25

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
5.77
Q3
2.79
Median
1.21
Q1
0.53
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry, KMX’s P/S Ratio of 0.25 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

DECK vs. KMX: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

DECK

6.24

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.74
Q3
5.59
Median
3.41
Q1
2.01
Min
0.56

DECK’s P/B Ratio of 6.24 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

KMX

1.48

Specialty Retail Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
7.92
Median
3.98
Q1
1.86
Min
0.55

KMX’s P/B Ratio of 1.48 is in the lower quartile for the Specialty Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

DECK vs. KMX: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods and Specialty Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolDECKKMX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.3312.66
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.960.25
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.241.48
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.007.90