DECK vs. EBAY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at DECK and EBAY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
| Symbol | DECK | EBAY |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Deckers Outdoor Corporation | eBay Inc. |
| Country | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Consumer Discretionary | Consumer Discretionary |
| GICS Industry | Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods | Broadline Retail |
| Market Capitalization | 15.80 billion USD | 46.05 billion USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NasdaqGS |
| Listing Date | October 15, 1993 | September 24, 1998 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of DECK and EBAY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | DECK | EBAY |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | 4.50% | 8.33% |
| 13-Week Price Return | -15.55% | 45.71% |
| 26-Week Price Return | -38.16% | 49.29% |
| 52-Week Price Return | -30.43% | 80.56% |
| Month-to-Date Return | 0.29% | 9.83% |
| Year-to-Date Return | -47.57% | 62.66% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 2.57M | 7.97M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 3.58M | 5.87M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 59.09% | 40.74% |
| Beta | 1.10 | 1.33 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
DECK
40.25%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 53.33%
- Q3
- 26.13%
- Median
- 18.47%
- Q1
- 7.99%
- Min
- -10.49%
In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Return on Equity of 40.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
EBAY
43.08%
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 49.17%
- Q3
- 28.98%
- Median
- 19.22%
- Q1
- 10.86%
- Min
- -11.14%
In the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, EBAY’s Return on Equity of 43.08% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
DECK
19.31%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 23.35%
- Q3
- 13.49%
- Median
- 8.45%
- Q1
- 4.18%
- Min
- -3.90%
A Net Profit Margin of 19.31% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
EBAY
20.86%
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 19.78%
- Q3
- 11.90%
- Median
- 8.63%
- Q1
- 5.21%
- Min
- 0.82%
EBAY’s Net Profit Margin of 20.86% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
DECK
23.64%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 29.47%
- Q3
- 20.87%
- Median
- 13.00%
- Q1
- 7.02%
- Min
- -3.59%
An Operating Profit Margin of 23.64% places DECK in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
EBAY
21.38%
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 27.23%
- Q3
- 15.96%
- Median
- 11.13%
- Q1
- 8.31%
- Min
- 1.77%
An Operating Profit Margin of 21.38% places EBAY in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | DECK | EBAY |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 40.25% | 43.08% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 26.80% | 11.47% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 19.31% | 20.86% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 23.64% | 21.38% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 57.63% | 71.88% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
DECK
2.94
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 3.91
- Q3
- 2.49
- Median
- 1.89
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.80
DECK’s Current Ratio of 2.94 is in the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.
EBAY
1.00
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 3.54
- Q3
- 2.42
- Median
- 1.49
- Q1
- 1.22
- Min
- 0.67
EBAY’s Current Ratio of 1.00 falls into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
DECK
0.00
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 2.67
- Q3
- 1.29
- Median
- 0.59
- Q1
- 0.24
- Min
- 0.00
Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, DECK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
EBAY
1.42
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 2.14
- Q3
- 1.34
- Median
- 0.63
- Q1
- 0.27
- Min
- 0.00
EBAY’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Broadline Retail industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.42. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
DECK
713.03
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 57.00
- Q3
- 35.85
- Median
- 9.20
- Q1
- 4.29
- Min
- -32.49
With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 713.03, DECK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.
EBAY
57.95
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 37.34
- Q3
- 20.63
- Median
- 11.28
- Q1
- 4.22
- Min
- -19.29
With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 57.95, EBAY demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | DECK | EBAY |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.94 | 1.00 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 2.08 | 0.97 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 0.00 | 1.42 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 713.03 | 57.95 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
DECK
0.00%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 6.59%
- Q3
- 3.60%
- Median
- 2.59%
- Q1
- 0.95%
- Min
- 0.00%
DECK currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
EBAY
1.17%
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 5.46%
- Q3
- 2.38%
- Median
- 0.43%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EBAY’s Dividend Yield of 1.17% is consistent with its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
DECK
0.00%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 195.44%
- Q3
- 106.47%
- Median
- 58.77%
- Q1
- 36.52%
- Min
- 0.00%
DECK has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
EBAY
24.13%
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 131.17%
- Q3
- 63.48%
- Median
- 29.43%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EBAY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 24.13% is within the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | DECK | EBAY |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.17% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 24.13% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
DECK
15.69
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 63.29
- Q3
- 34.64
- Median
- 18.01
- Q1
- 13.88
- Min
- 6.04
DECK’s P/E Ratio of 15.69 is within the middle range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
EBAY
20.64
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 66.12
- Q3
- 35.17
- Median
- 16.29
- Q1
- 10.47
- Min
- 5.94
EBAY’s P/E Ratio of 20.64 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
DECK
3.03
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 5.46
- Q3
- 3.13
- Median
- 1.72
- Q1
- 0.83
- Min
- 0.26
DECK’s P/S Ratio of 3.03 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
EBAY
4.31
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 3.33
- Median
- 2.04
- Q1
- 0.80
- Min
- 0.16
EBAY’s P/S Ratio of 4.31 is in the upper echelon for the Broadline Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
DECK
6.24
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry
- Max
- 9.76
- Q3
- 6.00
- Median
- 3.26
- Q1
- 1.97
- Min
- 0.69
DECK’s P/B Ratio of 6.24 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
EBAY
7.23
Broadline Retail Industry
- Max
- 9.06
- Q3
- 5.22
- Median
- 3.48
- Q1
- 1.90
- Min
- 0.74
EBAY’s P/B Ratio of 7.23 is in the upper tier for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | DECK | EBAY |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 15.69 | 20.64 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 3.03 | 4.31 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 6.24 | 7.23 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 14.34 | 21.18 |