CX vs. IFF: CEMEX vs. Intl Flavors & Fragrances Stock Comparison
How do CEMEX (CX) and Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
CEMEX (CX) and Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) both fall under the Materials industry group, but CX is classified in Construction Materials while IFF is classified in Chemicals.
Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) trades as ordinary local shares, while CEMEX (CX) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | CX | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cemex S.A.B. de C.V. Sponsored ADR | International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc. |
| Country/Region | Mexico | United States |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Construction Materials | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Construction Materials | Specialty Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 15.47 billion USD | 20.69 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | September 15, 1999 | December 17, 1974 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CX | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 7.57% | 40.13% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 17.84% | 8.28% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 10.81% | -8.71% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CX | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 36.82% | 36.26% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.57 | 0.88 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -53.08% | -56.66% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 7.01M | 1.88M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CX | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.09 | 0.99 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.14 | 1.71 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) reports a negative ROE of -7.37%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile CEMEX (CX) reports 5.17%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CX
Materials industry group
5.17%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- CX
- 5.17%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
IFF
Materials industry group
-7.37%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- IFF
- -7.37%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both CEMEX (CX) at 3.60% and Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 1.68% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CX
Materials industry group
3.60%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- CX
- 3.60%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
IFF
Materials industry group
1.68%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- IFF
- 1.68%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both CEMEX (CX) at 14.77% and Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 9.53% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CX
Materials industry group
14.77%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- CX
- 14.77%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
IFF
Materials industry group
9.53%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- IFF
- 9.53%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CX | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 5.17% | -7.37% |
| ROA (TTM) | 5.07% | 2.18% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 3.60% | 1.68% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 14.77% | 9.53% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 33.48% | 36.27% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
CEMEX (CX) at 0.43% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at -5.17% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
CEMEX (CX) at 2.35% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at -248.42% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CX | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 0.43% | -5.17% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 3.13% | -4.34% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 2.35% | -248.42% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 4.14% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 1.87 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while CEMEX (CX) at 0.95 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for CX.
CX
Materials industry group
0.95
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- CX
- 0.95
- Min
- 0.16
IFF
Materials industry group
1.87
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- IFF
- 1.87
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both CEMEX (CX) at 0.46 and Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 0.51 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CX
Materials industry group
0.46
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- CX
- 0.46
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
IFF
Materials industry group
0.51
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- IFF
- 0.51
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CX | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.95 | 1.87 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.46 | 0.51 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.60 | 3.51 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
CEMEX (CX) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) reports a yield of 1.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CX
Materials industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- CX
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IFF
Materials industry group
1.85%
- Max
- 4.52%
- IFF
- 1.85%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both CEMEX (CX) at 67.86% and Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 62.26% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.
CX
Materials industry group
67.86%
- Max
- 83.62%
- CX
- 67.86%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IFF
Materials industry group
62.26%
- Max
- 83.62%
- IFF
- 62.26%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CX | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 1.85% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 67.86% | 62.26% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both CEMEX (CX) at 67.00 and Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 236.06 trade above their industries’ P/E ratio peer ranges, pointing to unusually expensive trailing earnings relative to peers.
CX
Materials industry group
67.00
- CX
- 67.00
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
IFF
Materials industry group
236.06
- IFF
- 236.06
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both CEMEX (CX) at 0.89 and Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 1.91 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CX
Materials industry group
0.89
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- CX
- 0.89
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
IFF
Materials industry group
1.91
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- IFF
- 1.91
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
CEMEX (CX) at 1.20 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Intl Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) at 1.56 is valued near its industry’s middle — CX is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.
CX
Materials industry group
1.20
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- CX
- 1.20
- Min
- -0.17
IFF
Materials industry group
1.56
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- IFF
- 1.56
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CX | IFF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 67.00 | 236.06 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.89 | 1.91 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.20 | 1.56 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 8.86% | -10.66% |