Seek Returns logo

CW vs. VRSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CW and VRSK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCWVRSK
Company NameCurtiss-Wright CorporationVerisk Analytics, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryAerospace & DefenseProfessional Services
Market Capitalization18.72 billion USD36.91 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980October 7, 2009
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CW and VRSK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CW vs. VRSK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCWVRSK
5-Day Price Return4.93%-0.12%
13-Week Price Return28.25%-13.00%
26-Week Price Return41.82%-10.43%
52-Week Price Return66.34%0.70%
Month-to-Date Return1.34%-5.21%
Year-to-Date Return39.99%-4.08%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.46M1.35M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.33M0.96M
3-Month Volatility26.81%21.49%
Beta1.140.87

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CW

17.68%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

CW’s Return on Equity of 17.68% is on par with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VRSK

439.17%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

VRSK’s Return on Equity of 439.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CW vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CW

13.66%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.66% places CW in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VRSK

30.67%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

VRSK’s Net Profit Margin of 30.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CW vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CW

17.71%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

CW’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

VRSK

43.94%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

VRSK’s Operating Profit Margin of 43.94% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

CW vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCWVRSK
Return on Equity (TTM)17.68%439.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.02%19.55%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.66%30.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.71%43.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)37.34%69.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CW

1.95

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

CW’s Current Ratio of 1.95 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VRSK

1.53

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

VRSK’s Current Ratio of 1.53 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CW vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CW

0.35

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, CW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.35 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VRSK

10.43

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 10.43, VRSK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Professional Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CW vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CW

12.64

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

CW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VRSK

43.51

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.51, VRSK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CW vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCWVRSK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.951.53
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.351.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.3510.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.6443.51

Growth

Revenue Growth

CW vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CW vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CW

0.17%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CW’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VRSK

0.64%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.64% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CW vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CW

9.64%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 9.64% is within the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VRSK

25.76%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.76% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CW vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCWVRSK
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.17%0.64%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)9.64%25.76%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CW

40.76

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

CW’s P/E Ratio of 40.76 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VRSK

40.42

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

A P/E Ratio of 40.42 places VRSK in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CW vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CW

5.57

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

CW’s P/S Ratio of 5.57 is in the upper echelon for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VRSK

12.40

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 12.40, VRSK trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CW vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CW

6.79

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

CW’s P/B Ratio of 6.79 is within the conventional range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VRSK

139.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

At 139.79, VRSK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Professional Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CW vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCWVRSK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)40.7640.42
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.5712.40
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.79139.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)34.0136.29