CVE vs. FTI: Cenovus Energy vs. TechnipFMC Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Cenovus Energy (CVE) and TechnipFMC (FTI) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Cenovus Energy (CVE) and TechnipFMC (FTI) both fall under the Energy industry group, but CVE is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels while FTI is classified in Energy Equipment & Services.

Company profile comparison for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
Profile Item	CVE	FTI
Name	Cenovus Energy Inc.	TechnipFMC plc
Country/Region	Canada	United Kingdom
GICS Sector	Energy	Energy
GICS Industry Group	Energy	Energy
GICS Industry	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels	Energy Equipment & Services
GICS Sub-Industry	Integrated Oil & Gas	Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization	49.61 billion USD	24.70 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	November 17, 2009	June 15, 2001
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CVE

FTI

GSPC

Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and TechnipFMC (FTI). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and TechnipFMC (FTI). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
Metric	CVE	FTI
Total Return (1Y)	60.99%	51.75%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	19.41%	46.71%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	18.63%	54.94%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CVE

FTI

GSPC

Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and TechnipFMC (FTI). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
Metric	CVE	FTI
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	37.47%	32.65%
Beta (5Y)	0.43	0.87
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-53.51%	-36.71%
Avg. Volume (3M)	6.90M	2.86M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

CVE and FTI are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
Metric	CVE	FTI
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	1.51	1.45
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	2.20	2.11

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 27.44% and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 38.30% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

CVE

Energy industry group

27.44%

Max: 53.85%
CVE: 27.44%
Q3: 24.79%
Median: 12.85%
Q1: 2.03%
Min: -29.09%

FTI

Energy industry group

38.30%

Max: 53.85%
FTI: 38.30%
Q3: 24.79%
Median: 12.85%
Q1: 2.03%
Min: -29.09%

Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 15.42% and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 12.04% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

CVE

Energy industry group

15.42%

Max: 56.92%
Q3: 22.92%
CVE: 15.42%
Median: 10.10%
Q1: 0.07%
Min: -27.38%

FTI

Energy industry group

12.04%

Max: 56.92%
Q3: 22.92%
FTI: 12.04%
Median: 10.10%
Q1: 0.07%
Min: -27.38%

Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 26.58% and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 17.77% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

CVE

Energy industry group

26.58%

Max: 71.31%
Q3: 33.75%
CVE: 26.58%
Median: 18.73%
Q1: 6.94%
Min: -24.52%

FTI

Energy industry group

17.77%

Max: 71.31%
Q3: 33.75%
Median: 18.73%
FTI: 17.77%
Q1: 6.94%
Min: -24.52%

Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
Metric	CVE	FTI
ROE (TTM)	27.44%	38.30%
ROA (TTM)	12.05%	10.08%
Net Margin (TTM)	15.42%	12.04%
Operating Margin (TTM)	26.58%	17.77%
Gross Margin (TTM)	33.92%	23.60%

Growth

Revenue Growth

TechnipFMC (FTI) at 9.35% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at -8.62% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 28.74% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while TechnipFMC (FTI) at 20.42% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for CVE.

Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
Metric	CVE	FTI
Revenue Growth (YoY)	-8.62%	9.35%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	-9.75%	14.02%
EPS Growth (YoY)	28.74%	20.42%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	-12.42%	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.64 and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 1.09 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

CVE

Energy industry group

1.64

Max: 3.64
Q3: 2.21
CVE: 1.64
Median: 1.41
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.24

FTI

Energy industry group

1.09

Max: 3.64
Q3: 2.21
Median: 1.41
FTI: 1.09
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.24

Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.33 and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 0.39 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

CVE

Energy industry group

0.33

Max: 1.75
Q3: 0.93
Median: 0.54
CVE: 0.33
Q1: 0.30
Min: 0.00

FTI

Energy industry group

0.39

Max: 1.75
Q3: 0.93
Median: 0.54
FTI: 0.39
Q1: 0.30
Min: 0.00

Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
Metric	CVE	FTI
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.64	1.09
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	0.33	0.39
Net Debt / EBITDA	0.35	0.12

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 3.04% and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 0.32% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

CVE

Energy industry group

3.04%

Max: 8.57%
Q3: 3.58%
CVE: 3.04%
Median: 1.71%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

FTI

Energy industry group

0.32%

Max: 8.57%
Q3: 3.58%
Median: 1.71%
FTI: 0.32%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 22.84% and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 6.29% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

CVE

Energy industry group

22.84%

Max: 133.24%
Q3: 53.31%
Median: 25.24%
CVE: 22.84%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

FTI

Energy industry group

6.29%

Max: 133.24%
Q3: 53.31%
Median: 25.24%
FTI: 6.29%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
Metric	CVE	FTI
Dividend Yield (TTM)	3.04%	0.32%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	22.84%	6.29%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 10.56 and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 19.97 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

CVE

Energy industry group

10.56

Max: 39.54
Q3: 21.72
Median: 12.19
CVE: 10.56
Q1: 7.71
Min: 2.99

FTI

Energy industry group

19.97

Max: 39.54
Q3: 21.72
FTI: 19.97
Median: 12.19
Q1: 7.71
Min: 2.99

Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.88 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while TechnipFMC (FTI) at 2.32 prices around its industry’s middle — CVE costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

CVE

Energy industry group

0.88

Max: 5.40
Q3: 2.85
Median: 1.69
Q1: 0.88
CVE: 0.88
Min: 0.00

FTI

Energy industry group

2.32

Max: 5.40
Q3: 2.85
FTI: 2.32
Median: 1.69
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.00

Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.98 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while TechnipFMC (FTI) at 7.44 prices above its benchmark range — FTI looks rich relative to book.

CVE

Energy industry group

1.98

Max: 4.21
Q3: 2.38
CVE: 1.98
Median: 1.51
Q1: 1.08
Min: 0.01

FTI

Energy industry group

7.44

FTI: 7.44
Max: 4.21
Q3: 2.38
Median: 1.51
Q1: 1.08
Min: 0.01

Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
Metric	CVE	FTI
P/E Ratio (TTM)	10.56	19.97
P/S Ratio (TTM)	0.88	2.32
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	1.98	7.44
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	20.71%	6.01%