Seek Returns

CTAS vs. GFL: Cintas vs. GFL Environmental Stock Comparison

How do Cintas (CTAS) and GFL Environmental (GFL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Cintas (CTAS) and GFL Environmental (GFL) both belong to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, though CTAS is classified under Diversified Support Services while GFL falls under Environmental & Facilities Services.

Cintas (CTAS) has more than two decades of public-market history since August 19, 1983, whereas GFL Environmental (GFL) listed on March 3, 2020 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Company profile comparison for Cintas (CTAS) and GFL Environmental (GFL)
Profile ItemCTASGFL
NameCintas CorporationGFL Environmental Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupCommercial & Professional ServicesCommercial & Professional Services
GICS IndustryCommercial Services & SuppliesCommercial Services & Supplies
GICS Sub-IndustryDiversified Support ServicesEnvironmental & Facilities Services
Market Capitalization88.29 billion USD16.72 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNYSE
Listing DateAugust 19, 1983March 3, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CTAS
GFL
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Cintas (CTAS) and GFL Environmental (GFL). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Cintas (CTAS) and GFL Environmental (GFL). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Cintas (CTAS) and GFL Environmental (GFL)
MetricCTASGFL
Total Return (1Y)21.43%7.30%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)20.18%17.51%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)16.37%3.62%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CTAS
GFL
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Cintas (CTAS) and GFL Environmental (GFL). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Cintas (CTAS) and GFL Environmental (GFL)
MetricCTASGFL
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)23.96%29.80%
Beta (5Y)0.850.66
Max Drawdown (5Y)-27.68%-42.75%
Avg. Volume (3M)1.91M3.45M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CTAS and GFL are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Cintas (CTAS) and GFL Environmental (GFL)
MetricCTASGFL
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.720.10
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.060.15

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

GFL Environmental (GFL) reports a negative ROE of -2.97%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Cintas (CTAS) reports 41.38%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

41.38%

Max
47.06%
CTAS
41.38%
Q3
25.43%
Median
14.11%
Q1
3.92%
Min
-20.15%

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

-2.97%

Max
47.06%
Q3
25.43%
Median
14.11%
Q1
3.92%
GFL
-2.97%
Min
-20.15%
Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): A comparison of their ROE against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

GFL Environmental (GFL) reports a negative net margin of -4.28%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Cintas (CTAS) reports 17.82%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

17.82%

Max
23.28%
CTAS
17.82%
Q3
11.35%
Median
5.65%
Q1
0.87%
Min
-8.60%

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

-4.28%

Max
23.28%
Q3
11.35%
Median
5.65%
Q1
0.87%
GFL
-4.28%
Min
-8.60%
Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): A comparison of their net margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Cintas (CTAS) at 24.10% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of GFL Environmental (GFL) at 9.44%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

24.10%

Max
38.50%
CTAS
24.10%
Q3
18.84%
Median
10.40%
Q1
5.59%
Min
-12.00%

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

9.44%

Max
38.50%
Q3
18.84%
Median
10.40%
GFL
9.44%
Q1
5.59%
Min
-12.00%
Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): A comparison of their operating margin against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Cintas (CTAS) and GFL Environmental (GFL)
MetricCTASGFL
ROE (TTM)41.38%-2.97%
ROA (TTM)16.66%1.11%
Net Margin (TTM)17.82%-4.28%
Operating Margin (TTM)24.10%9.44%
Gross Margin (TTM)50.99%19.78%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Cintas (CTAS) at 8.94% and GFL Environmental (GFL) at 7.77% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Only one side can be read here: Cintas (CTAS) reports EPS growth of 11.59%, ranked against its industry; GFL Environmental (GFL) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Cintas (CTAS) and GFL Environmental (GFL)
MetricCTASGFL
Revenue Growth (YoY)8.94%7.77%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)8.51%-0.72%
EPS Growth (YoY)11.59%--
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)14.77%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Cintas (CTAS) at 1.45 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while GFL Environmental (GFL) at 0.93 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for GFL.

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.45

Max
3.63
Q3
2.14
Median
1.55
CTAS
1.45
Q1
1.09
Min
0.45

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.93

Max
3.63
Q3
2.14
Median
1.55
Q1
1.09
GFL
0.93
Min
0.45
Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): A comparison of their current ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Cintas (CTAS) at 0.52 and GFL Environmental (GFL) at 1.04 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.52

Max
2.37
Q3
1.25
Median
0.88
CTAS
0.52
Q1
0.35
Min
0.00

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

1.04

Max
2.37
Q3
1.25
GFL
1.04
Median
0.88
Q1
0.35
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Cintas (CTAS) and GFL Environmental (GFL)
MetricCTASGFL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.450.93
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.521.04
Net Debt / EBITDA0.766.75

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Cintas (CTAS) at 0.83% and GFL Environmental (GFL) at 0.14% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.83%

Max
4.33%
Q3
1.80%
CTAS
0.83%
Median
0.60%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

0.14%

Max
4.33%
Q3
1.80%
Median
0.60%
GFL
0.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Cintas (CTAS) at 36.88% and GFL Environmental (GFL) at 19.07% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

36.88%

Max
99.58%
Q3
41.99%
CTAS
36.88%
Median
17.27%
Q1
0.00%
Min
-17.94%

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

19.07%

Max
99.58%
Q3
41.99%
GFL
19.07%
Median
17.27%
Q1
0.00%
Min
-17.94%
Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Cintas (CTAS) and GFL Environmental (GFL)
MetricCTASGFL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.83%0.14%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)36.88%19.07%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Cintas (CTAS) trades at 43.86 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while GFL Environmental (GFL) has no P/E ratio this period.

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

43.86

Max
49.47
CTAS
43.86
Q3
33.76
Median
24.16
Q1
16.01
Min
1.89

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

--

Max
49.47
Q3
33.76
Median
24.16
Q1
16.01
Min
1.89
GFL
--
Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): GFL does not report P/E ratio, so it has no value marker; CTAS is benchmarked against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

GFL Environmental (GFL) at 2.25 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Cintas (CTAS) at 7.64 clears its benchmark range — CTAS looks notably rich on sales.

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

7.64

CTAS
7.64
Max
7.17
Q3
3.35
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.11

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.25

Max
7.17
Q3
3.35
GFL
2.25
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.11
Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

GFL Environmental (GFL) at 2.42 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Cintas (CTAS) at 17.07 prices above its benchmark range — CTAS looks rich relative to book.

CTAS

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

17.07

CTAS
17.07
Max
11.25
Q3
6.08
Median
2.92
Q1
1.55
Min
-2.78

GFL

Commercial & Professional Services industry group

2.42

Max
11.25
Q3
6.08
Median
2.92
GFL
2.42
Q1
1.55
Min
-2.78
Loading chart…
Cintas (CTAS) vs. GFL Environmental (GFL): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Commercial & Professional Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Cintas (CTAS) and GFL Environmental (GFL)
MetricCTASGFL
P/E Ratio (TTM)43.86--
P/S Ratio (TTM)7.642.25
P/B Ratio (MRQ)17.072.42
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)1.98%1.55%