CSL vs. VRT: Carlisle vs. Vertiv Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Carlisle (CSL) and Vertiv (VRT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Carlisle (CSL) and Vertiv (VRT) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CSL is classified in Building Products while VRT is classified in Electrical Equipment.

Company profile comparison for Carlisle (CSL) and Vertiv (VRT)
Profile Item	CSL	VRT
Name	Carlisle Companies Incorporated	Vertiv Holdings Co Class A Common Stock
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Capital Goods	Capital Goods
GICS Industry	Building Products	Electrical Equipment
GICS Sub-Industry	Building Products	Electrical Components & Equipment
Market Capitalization	14.52 billion USD	70.41 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	February 21, 1973	August 2, 2018
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CSL

VRT

GSPC

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Vertiv (VRT), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Carlisle (CSL) and Vertiv (VRT). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Carlisle (CSL) and Vertiv (VRT). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Vertiv (VRT)
Metric	CSL	VRT
Total Return (1Y)	24.99%	11.12%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	15.85%	71.14%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	12.02%	49.38%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CSL

VRT

GSPC

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Vertiv (VRT), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Carlisle (CSL) and Vertiv (VRT). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Vertiv (VRT) carries a highly aggressive beta of 2.15, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Carlisle (CSL) is closer to market-like at 0.76 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk profile metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Vertiv (VRT)
Metric	CSL	VRT
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	38.46%	71.11%
Beta (5Y)	0.76	2.15
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-37.72%	-69.52%
Avg. Volume (3M)	509.16K	5.90M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

CSL and VRT are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Vertiv (VRT)
Metric	CSL	VRT
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.54	0.10
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	0.87	0.14

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Carlisle (CSL) at 42.34% and Vertiv (VRT) at 46.57% turn shareholders’ equity into profit at rates above their industry benchmark ranges for ROE. That is a strong capital-efficiency signal, though leverage and the equity base still matter.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

42.34%

CSL: 42.34%
Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

46.57%

VRT: 46.57%
Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

For every dollar of sales, both Carlisle (CSL) at 13.78% and Vertiv (VRT) at 16.00% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

13.78%

Max: 27.47%
CSL: 13.78%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

16.00%

Max: 27.47%
VRT: 16.00%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Carlisle (CSL) at 20.21% and Vertiv (VRT) at 23.77% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

20.21%

Max: 36.60%
CSL: 20.21%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

23.77%

Max: 36.60%
VRT: 23.77%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Vertiv (VRT)
Metric	CSL	VRT
ROE (TTM)	42.34%	46.57%
ROA (TTM)	10.20%	11.94%
Net Margin (TTM)	13.78%	16.00%
Operating Margin (TTM)	20.21%	23.77%
Gross Margin (TTM)	34.66%	38.12%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Vertiv (VRT) at 27.69% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Carlisle (CSL) at 0.33% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Vertiv (VRT) at 166.41% delivers above-range EPS growth, while Carlisle (CSL) at -38.46% falls into the bottom quartile — a wide split in earnings momentum.

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Vertiv (VRT)
Metric	CSL	VRT
Revenue Growth (YoY)	0.33%	27.69%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	-2.70%	21.59%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-38.46%	166.41%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	-0.84%	340.11%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Carlisle (CSL) at 2.41 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Vertiv (VRT) at 1.39 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for VRT.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

2.41

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
CSL: 2.41
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
Min: 0.36

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

1.39

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
VRT: 1.39
Min: 0.36

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Vertiv (VRT) at 0.61 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Carlisle (CSL) at 2.01 uses more debt funding than most peers.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

2.01

Max: 2.33
CSL: 2.01
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

0.61

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
VRT: 0.61
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Vertiv (VRT)
Metric	CSL	VRT
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.41	1.39
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	2.01	0.61
Net Debt / EBITDA	1.93	-0.11

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Carlisle (CSL) at 1.20% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Vertiv (VRT) at 0.11% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, CSL the richer one.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

1.20%

Max: 2.66%
CSL: 1.20%
Q3: 1.14%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

0.11%

Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
Median: 0.24%
VRT: 0.11%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Carlisle (CSL) at 25.50% and Vertiv (VRT) at 4.67% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

25.50%

Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
CSL: 25.50%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

4.67%

Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
Median: 6.86%
VRT: 4.67%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Vertiv (VRT)
Metric	CSL	VRT
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.20%	0.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	25.50%	4.67%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Carlisle (CSL) at 21.06 and Vertiv (VRT) at 34.18 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

21.06

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
Median: 25.41
CSL: 21.06
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

34.18

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
VRT: 34.18
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Carlisle (CSL) at 2.79 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Vertiv (VRT) at 5.37 sits in the pricier quartile — VRT costs more per dollar of sales.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

2.79

Max: 7.54
Q3: 3.76
CSL: 2.79
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

5.37

Max: 7.54
VRT: 5.37
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Measured against book value, both Carlisle (CSL) at 10.11 and Vertiv (VRT) at 12.80 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

10.11

CSL: 10.11
Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

VRT

Capital Goods industry group

12.80

VRT: 12.80
Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Vertiv (VRT): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Vertiv (VRT)
Metric	CSL	VRT
P/E Ratio (TTM)	21.06	34.18
P/S Ratio (TTM)	2.79	5.37
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	10.11	12.80
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	4.01%	4.21%