CSL vs. MMM: Carlisle vs. 3M Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Carlisle (CSL) and 3M (MMM) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Carlisle (CSL) and 3M (MMM) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CSL is classified in Building Products while MMM is classified in Industrial Conglomerates.

Company profile comparison for Carlisle (CSL) and 3M (MMM)
Profile Item	CSL	MMM
Name	Carlisle Companies Incorporated	3M Company
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Capital Goods	Capital Goods
GICS Industry	Building Products	Industrial Conglomerates
GICS Sub-Industry	Building Products	Industrial Conglomerates
Market Capitalization	14.52 billion USD	95.67 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	February 21, 1973	January 2, 1962
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CSL

MMM

GSPC

Carlisle (CSL) vs. 3M (MMM), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Carlisle (CSL) and 3M (MMM). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Carlisle (CSL) and 3M (MMM). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and 3M (MMM)
Metric	CSL	MMM
Total Return (1Y)	24.99%	16.26%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	15.85%	38.64%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	12.02%	8.14%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CSL

MMM

GSPC

Carlisle (CSL) vs. 3M (MMM), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Carlisle (CSL) and 3M (MMM). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and 3M (MMM)
Metric	CSL	MMM
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	38.46%	27.61%
Beta (5Y)	0.76	0.97
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-37.72%	-48.86%
Avg. Volume (3M)	509.16K	3.14M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

CSL and MMM are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and 3M (MMM)
Metric	CSL	MMM
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.54	0.43
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	0.87	0.70

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Carlisle (CSL) at 42.34% and 3M (MMM) at 72.97% turn shareholders’ equity into profit at rates above their industry benchmark ranges for ROE. That is a strong capital-efficiency signal, though leverage and the equity base still matter.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

42.34%

CSL: 42.34%
Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

MMM

Capital Goods industry group

72.97%

MMM: 72.97%
Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

Carlisle (CSL) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

For every dollar of sales, both Carlisle (CSL) at 13.78% and 3M (MMM) at 14.01% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

13.78%

Max: 27.47%
CSL: 13.78%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

MMM

Capital Goods industry group

14.01%

Max: 27.47%
MMM: 14.01%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

Carlisle (CSL) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Carlisle (CSL) at 20.21% and 3M (MMM) at 23.69% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

20.21%

Max: 36.60%
CSL: 20.21%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

MMM

Capital Goods industry group

23.69%

Max: 36.60%
MMM: 23.69%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

Carlisle (CSL) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and 3M (MMM)
Metric	CSL	MMM
ROE (TTM)	42.34%	72.97%
ROA (TTM)	10.20%	8.22%
Net Margin (TTM)	13.78%	14.01%
Operating Margin (TTM)	20.21%	23.69%
Gross Margin (TTM)	34.66%	39.53%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Carlisle (CSL) at 0.33% and 3M (MMM) at 1.52% post bottom-quartile revenue growth versus peers, pointing to weaker demand or pricing momentum than typical rivals.

Carlisle (CSL) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

3M (MMM) at -20.53% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Carlisle (CSL) at -38.46% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Carlisle (CSL) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and 3M (MMM)
Metric	CSL	MMM
Revenue Growth (YoY)	0.33%	1.52%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	-2.70%	-1.57%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-38.46%	-20.53%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	-0.84%	-16.16%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Carlisle (CSL) at 2.41 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while 3M (MMM) at 1.41 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for MMM.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

2.41

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
CSL: 2.41
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
Min: 0.36

MMM

Capital Goods industry group

1.41

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
MMM: 1.41
Min: 0.36

Carlisle (CSL) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both balance sheets lean debt-heavy versus peers, but MMM is more stretched: Carlisle (CSL) at 2.01 sits in the higher-leverage quartile and 3M (MMM) at 3.04 is above its industry benchmark range.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

2.01

Max: 2.33
CSL: 2.01
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

MMM

Capital Goods industry group

3.04

MMM: 3.04
Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

Carlisle (CSL) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and 3M (MMM)
Metric	CSL	MMM
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.41	1.41
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	2.01	3.04
Net Debt / EBITDA	1.93	1.26

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Carlisle (CSL) at 1.20% and 3M (MMM) at 1.64% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

1.20%

Max: 2.66%
CSL: 1.20%
Q3: 1.14%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MMM

Capital Goods industry group

1.64%

Max: 2.66%
MMM: 1.64%
Q3: 1.14%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Carlisle (CSL) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Carlisle (CSL) at 25.50% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while 3M (MMM) at 45.82% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

25.50%

Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
CSL: 25.50%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MMM

Capital Goods industry group

45.82%

Max: 67.39%
MMM: 45.82%
Q3: 28.02%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Carlisle (CSL) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and 3M (MMM)
Metric	CSL	MMM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.20%	1.64%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	25.50%	45.82%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Carlisle (CSL) at 21.06 and 3M (MMM) at 27.63 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

21.06

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
Median: 25.41
CSL: 21.06
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

MMM

Capital Goods industry group

27.63

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
MMM: 27.63
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

Carlisle (CSL) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Carlisle (CSL) at 2.79 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while 3M (MMM) at 3.79 sits in the pricier quartile — MMM costs more per dollar of sales.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

2.79

Max: 7.54
Q3: 3.76
CSL: 2.79
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

MMM

Capital Goods industry group

3.79

Max: 7.54
MMM: 3.79
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

Carlisle (CSL) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Measured against book value, both Carlisle (CSL) at 10.11 and 3M (MMM) at 23.18 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

10.11

CSL: 10.11
Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

MMM

Capital Goods industry group

23.18

MMM: 23.18
Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

Carlisle (CSL) vs. 3M (MMM): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and 3M (MMM)
Metric	CSL	MMM
P/E Ratio (TTM)	21.06	27.63
P/S Ratio (TTM)	2.79	3.79
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	10.11	23.18
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	4.01%	6.66%