CSL vs. LII: Carlisle vs. Lennox Stock Comparison
How do Carlisle (CSL) and Lennox (LII) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Carlisle (CSL) and Lennox (LII) are both classified in the Building Products sub-industry within the broader Building Products industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | CSL | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Carlisle Companies Incorporated | Lennox International Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Building Products | Building Products |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Building Products | Building Products |
| Market Capitalization | 14.52 billion USD | 11.70 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | July 29, 1999 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CSL | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 24.99% | -27.83% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 15.85% | -2.32% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 12.02% | 3.79% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CSL | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 38.46% | 41.59% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.76 | 1.18 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -37.72% | -49.95% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 509.16K | 563.34K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CSL | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.54 | -0.77 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.87 | -0.96 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Carlisle (CSL) at 42.34% and Lennox (LII) at 62.82% turn shareholders’ equity into profit at rates above their industry benchmark ranges for ROE. That is a strong capital-efficiency signal, though leverage and the equity base still matter.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
42.34%
- CSL
- 42.34%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
LII
Capital Goods industry group
62.82%
- LII
- 62.82%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Carlisle (CSL) at 13.78% and Lennox (LII) at 13.76% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
13.78%
- Max
- 27.47%
- CSL
- 13.78%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
LII
Capital Goods industry group
13.76%
- Max
- 27.47%
- LII
- 13.76%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Carlisle (CSL) at 20.21% and Lennox (LII) at 20.57% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
20.21%
- Max
- 36.60%
- CSL
- 20.21%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
LII
Capital Goods industry group
20.57%
- Max
- 36.60%
- LII
- 20.57%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CSL | LII |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 42.34% | 62.82% |
| ROA (TTM) | 10.20% | 15.93% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 13.78% | 13.76% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 20.21% | 20.57% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 34.66% | 32.62% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Carlisle (CSL) at 0.33% and Lennox (LII) at -2.73% post bottom-quartile revenue growth versus peers, pointing to weaker demand or pricing momentum than typical rivals.
EPS Growth
Lennox (LII) at 1.11% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Carlisle (CSL) at -38.46% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CSL | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 0.33% | -2.73% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -2.70% | 3.26% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -38.46% | 1.11% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -0.84% | 17.97% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Carlisle (CSL) at 2.41 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Lennox (LII) at 1.21 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for LII.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
2.41
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- CSL
- 2.41
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
LII
Capital Goods industry group
1.21
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- LII
- 1.21
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Carlisle (CSL) at 2.01 and Lennox (LII) at 1.58 lean more heavily on debt funding than most peers, landing in the higher-leverage quartile of their industries.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
2.01
- Max
- 2.33
- CSL
- 2.01
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
LII
Capital Goods industry group
1.58
- Max
- 2.33
- LII
- 1.58
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CSL | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.41 | 1.21 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 2.01 | 1.58 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.93 | 1.73 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Carlisle (CSL) at 1.20% and Lennox (LII) at 1.53% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
1.20%
- Max
- 2.66%
- CSL
- 1.20%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LII
Capital Goods industry group
1.53%
- Max
- 2.66%
- LII
- 1.53%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Carlisle (CSL) at 25.50% and Lennox (LII) at 24.68% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
25.50%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- CSL
- 25.50%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LII
Capital Goods industry group
24.68%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- LII
- 24.68%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CSL | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.20% | 1.53% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 25.50% | 24.68% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Lennox (LII) at 15.47 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Carlisle (CSL) at 21.06 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for LII, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
21.06
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- CSL
- 21.06
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
LII
Capital Goods industry group
15.47
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- LII
- 15.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Carlisle (CSL) at 2.79 and Lennox (LII) at 2.15 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
2.79
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- CSL
- 2.79
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
LII
Capital Goods industry group
2.15
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- LII
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: Lennox (LII) at 8.88 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Carlisle (CSL) at 10.11 prices even higher, above its industry range.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
10.11
- CSL
- 10.11
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
LII
Capital Goods industry group
8.88
- Max
- 9.66
- LII
- 8.88
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CSL | LII |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 21.06 | 15.47 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.79 | 2.15 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 10.11 | 8.88 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.01% | 3.14% |