CSL vs. IR: Carlisle vs. Ingersoll Rand Stock Comparison
How do Carlisle (CSL) and Ingersoll Rand (IR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Carlisle (CSL) and Ingersoll Rand (IR) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CSL is classified in Building Products while IR is classified in Machinery.
| Profile Item | CSL | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Carlisle Companies Incorporated | Ingersoll Rand Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Building Products | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Building Products | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 14.52 billion USD | 31.87 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | May 12, 2017 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CSL | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 24.99% | 12.39% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 15.85% | 9.19% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 12.02% | 8.02% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CSL | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 38.46% | 34.08% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.76 | 1.12 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -37.72% | -36.62% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 509.16K | 4.27M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CSL | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.54 | 0.24 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.87 | 0.37 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Carlisle (CSL) at 42.34% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 13.41%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
42.34%
- CSL
- 42.34%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
13.41%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- IR
- 13.41%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Carlisle (CSL) at 13.78% and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 17.20% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
13.78%
- Max
- 27.47%
- CSL
- 13.78%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
17.20%
- Max
- 27.47%
- IR
- 17.20%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Carlisle (CSL) at 20.21% and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 18.79% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
20.21%
- Max
- 36.60%
- CSL
- 20.21%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
18.79%
- Max
- 36.60%
- IR
- 18.79%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CSL | IR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 42.34% | 13.41% |
| ROA (TTM) | 10.20% | 4.98% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 13.78% | 17.20% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 20.21% | 18.79% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 34.66% | 42.57% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 5.75% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Carlisle (CSL) at 0.33% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Carlisle (CSL) at -38.46% and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at -29.61% post bottom-quartile EPS growth versus peers, pointing to weaker earnings momentum than typical rivals.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CSL | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 0.33% | 5.75% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -2.70% | 8.95% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -38.46% | -29.61% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -0.84% | -0.46% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Carlisle (CSL) at 2.41 and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 1.69 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
2.41
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- CSL
- 2.41
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
IR
Capital Goods industry group
1.69
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- IR
- 1.69
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.46 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Carlisle (CSL) at 2.01 uses more debt funding than most peers.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
2.01
- Max
- 2.33
- CSL
- 2.01
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.46
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- IR
- 0.46
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CSL | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.41 | 1.69 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 2.01 | 0.46 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.93 | 1.76 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Carlisle (CSL) at 1.20% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.10% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, CSL the richer one.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
1.20%
- Max
- 2.66%
- CSL
- 1.20%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.10%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- IR
- 0.10%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Carlisle (CSL) at 25.50% and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 2.27% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
25.50%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- CSL
- 25.50%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
2.27%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- IR
- 2.27%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CSL | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.20% | 0.10% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 25.50% | 2.27% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Carlisle (CSL) at 21.06 and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 23.51 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
21.06
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- CSL
- 21.06
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
IR
Capital Goods industry group
23.51
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- IR
- 23.51
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Carlisle (CSL) at 2.79 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.96 sits in the pricier quartile — IR costs more per dollar of sales.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
2.79
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- CSL
- 2.79
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.96
- Max
- 7.54
- IR
- 3.96
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.03 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Carlisle (CSL) at 10.11 prices above its benchmark range — CSL looks rich relative to book.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
10.11
- CSL
- 10.11
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.03
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- IR
- 3.03
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CSL | IR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 21.06 | 23.51 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.79 | 3.96 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 10.11 | 3.03 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.01% | 3.19% |