Seek Returns logo

CSL vs. GPN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CSL and GPN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCSLGPN
Company NameCarlisle Companies IncorporatedGlobal Payments Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsFinancials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsFinancial Services
Market Capitalization14.11 billion USD21.48 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973January 16, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CSL and GPN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CSL vs. GPN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCSLGPN
5-Day Price Return-0.55%2.44%
13-Week Price Return-19.98%9.77%
26-Week Price Return0.93%-4.79%
52-Week Price Return-29.19%-9.27%
Month-to-Date Return0.36%6.56%
Year-to-Date Return-10.50%-21.00%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.48M2.13M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.50M2.50M
3-Month Volatility43.87%35.89%
Beta0.970.84

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CSL

33.90%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.60%
Median
15.43%
Q1
8.94%
Min
0.77%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, CSL’s Return on Equity of 33.90% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

GPN

6.36%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

GPN’s Return on Equity of 6.36% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CSL vs. GPN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CSL

16.12%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.42%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.72%
Q1
4.81%
Min
0.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.12% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GPN

15.07%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

GPN’s Net Profit Margin of 15.07% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CSL vs. GPN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CSL

21.17%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
17.70%
Median
12.14%
Q1
9.54%
Min
1.65%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GPN

23.26%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

GPN’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.26% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CSL vs. GPN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCSLGPN
Return on Equity (TTM)33.90%6.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.86%2.96%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.12%15.07%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.17%23.26%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.92%65.01%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

2.19

Building Products Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.06
Median
1.60
Q1
1.30
Min
0.88

CSL’s Current Ratio of 2.19 is in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

GPN

0.95

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CSL vs. GPN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

0.89

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.62
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

CSL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.89 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GPN

0.74

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

CSL vs. GPN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CSL

86.45

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
2.97

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 86.45, CSL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Building Products industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

GPN

5.15

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

CSL vs. GPN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCSLGPN
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.190.95
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.470.90
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.890.74
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)86.455.15

Growth

Revenue Growth

CSL vs. GPN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CSL vs. GPN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CSL

1.27%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.92%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Yield of 1.27% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

GPN

1.15%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Yield of 1.15% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CSL vs. GPN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CSL

22.20%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
76.90%
Median
30.70%
Q1
17.97%
Min
0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.20% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GPN

17.30%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GPN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.30% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CSL vs. GPN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCSLGPN
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.27%1.15%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.20%17.30%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CSL

17.47

Building Products Industry

Max
45.60
Q3
30.36
Median
21.97
Q1
17.37
Min
12.44

CSL’s P/E Ratio of 17.47 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GPN

15.00

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

GPN’s P/E Ratio of 15.00 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CSL vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CSL

2.82

Building Products Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
3.09
Median
1.72
Q1
1.07
Min
0.37

CSL’s P/S Ratio of 2.82 aligns with the market consensus for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GPN

2.26

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

CSL vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

7.62

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.69
Median
2.98
Q1
1.80
Min
0.66

CSL’s P/B Ratio of 7.62 is in the upper tier for the Building Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GPN

0.86

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

GPN’s P/B Ratio of 0.86 is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CSL vs. GPN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCSLGPN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)17.4715.00
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.822.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.620.86
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.906.87