CSL vs. FTV: Carlisle vs. Fortive Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Carlisle (CSL) and Fortive (FTV) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Carlisle (CSL) and Fortive (FTV) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CSL is classified in Building Products while FTV is classified in Machinery.

Company profile comparison for Carlisle (CSL) and Fortive (FTV)
Profile Item	CSL	FTV
Name	Carlisle Companies Incorporated	Fortive Corporation
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Capital Goods	Capital Goods
GICS Industry	Building Products	Machinery
GICS Sub-Industry	Building Products	Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components
Market Capitalization	14.52 billion USD	19.46 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	February 21, 1973	July 5, 2016
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CSL

FTV

GSPC

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Fortive (FTV), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Carlisle (CSL) and Fortive (FTV). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Carlisle (CSL) and Fortive (FTV). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Fortive (FTV)
Metric	CSL	FTV
Total Return (1Y)	24.99%	31.85%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	15.85%	11.44%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	12.02%	3.01%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CSL

FTV

GSPC

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Fortive (FTV), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Carlisle (CSL) and Fortive (FTV). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Fortive (FTV)
Metric	CSL	FTV
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	38.46%	27.76%
Beta (5Y)	0.76	1.01
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-37.72%	-32.10%
Avg. Volume (3M)	509.16K	2.44M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

CSL and FTV are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Fortive (FTV)
Metric	CSL	FTV
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.54	0.99
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	0.87	1.51

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Carlisle (CSL) at 42.34% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Fortive (FTV) at 10.55%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

42.34%

CSL: 42.34%
Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

10.55%

Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
FTV: 10.55%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

For every dollar of sales, both Carlisle (CSL) at 13.78% and Fortive (FTV) at 14.83% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

13.78%

Max: 27.47%
CSL: 13.78%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

14.83%

Max: 27.47%
FTV: 14.83%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Carlisle (CSL) at 20.21% and Fortive (FTV) at 21.30% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

20.21%

Max: 36.60%
CSL: 20.21%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

21.30%

Max: 36.60%
FTV: 21.30%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Fortive (FTV)
Metric	CSL	FTV
ROE (TTM)	42.34%	10.55%
ROA (TTM)	10.20%	4.61%
Net Margin (TTM)	13.78%	14.83%
Operating Margin (TTM)	20.21%	21.30%
Gross Margin (TTM)	34.66%	63.47%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Fortive (FTV) at 1.92% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Carlisle (CSL) at 0.33% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Fortive (FTV) at -26.69% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Carlisle (CSL) at -38.46% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Fortive (FTV)
Metric	CSL	FTV
Revenue Growth (YoY)	0.33%	1.92%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	-2.70%	-10.62%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-38.46%	-26.69%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	-0.84%	-6.26%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Carlisle (CSL) at 2.41 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Fortive (FTV) at 1.23 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FTV.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

2.41

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
CSL: 2.41
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
Min: 0.36

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

1.23

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
FTV: 1.23
Min: 0.36

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Fortive (FTV) at 0.60 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Carlisle (CSL) at 2.01 uses more debt funding than most peers.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

2.01

Max: 2.33
CSL: 2.01
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

0.60

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
FTV: 0.60
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Fortive (FTV)
Metric	CSL	FTV
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.41	1.23
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	2.01	0.60
Net Debt / EBITDA	1.93	2.45

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Carlisle (CSL) at 1.20% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Fortive (FTV) at 0.38% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, CSL the richer one.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

1.20%

Max: 2.66%
CSL: 1.20%
Q3: 1.14%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

0.38%

Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
FTV: 0.38%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Carlisle (CSL) at 25.50% and Fortive (FTV) at 11.85% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

25.50%

Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
CSL: 25.50%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

11.85%

Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
FTV: 11.85%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Fortive (FTV)
Metric	CSL	FTV
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.20%	0.38%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	25.50%	11.85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Carlisle (CSL) at 21.06 and Fortive (FTV) at 30.98 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

21.06

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
Median: 25.41
CSL: 21.06
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

30.98

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
FTV: 30.98
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Carlisle (CSL) at 2.79 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Fortive (FTV) at 4.43 sits in the pricier quartile — FTV costs more per dollar of sales.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

2.79

Max: 7.54
Q3: 3.76
CSL: 2.79
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

4.43

Max: 7.54
FTV: 4.43
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Fortive (FTV) at 3.28 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Carlisle (CSL) at 10.11 prices above its benchmark range — CSL looks rich relative to book.

CSL

Capital Goods industry group

10.11

CSL: 10.11
Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

FTV

Capital Goods industry group

3.28

Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
FTV: 3.28
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

Carlisle (CSL) vs. Fortive (FTV): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Carlisle (CSL) and Fortive (FTV)
Metric	CSL	FTV
P/E Ratio (TTM)	21.06	30.98
P/S Ratio (TTM)	2.79	4.43
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	10.11	3.28
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	4.01%	5.05%