CSL vs. DRS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at CSL and DRS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
Symbol | CSL | DRS |
---|---|---|
Company Name | Carlisle Companies Incorporated | Leonardo DRS, Inc. |
Country | United States | United States |
GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
GICS Industry | Building Products | Aerospace & Defense |
Market Capitalization | 14.17 billion USD | 11.86 billion USD |
Exchange | NYSE | NasdaqGS |
Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | June 24, 1985 |
Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of CSL and DRS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
Symbol | CSL | DRS |
---|---|---|
5-Day Price Return | -0.89% | 5.27% |
13-Week Price Return | -11.90% | -1.13% |
26-Week Price Return | -5.14% | 33.19% |
52-Week Price Return | -26.01% | 57.97% |
Month-to-Date Return | -14.75% | -1.81% |
Year-to-Date Return | -10.81% | 37.98% |
10-Day Avg. Volume | 0.68M | 1.02M |
3-Month Avg. Volume | 0.49M | 1.23M |
3-Month Volatility | 44.78% | 33.85% |
Beta | 1.01 | 0.51 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
CSL
33.90%
Building Products Industry
- Max
- 46.90%
- Q3
- 27.60%
- Median
- 15.43%
- Q1
- 8.94%
- Min
- 0.77%
In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, CSL’s Return on Equity of 33.90% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
DRS
9.80%
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 37.11%
- Q3
- 20.14%
- Median
- 11.72%
- Q1
- 6.30%
- Min
- -6.24%
DRS’s Return on Equity of 9.80% is on par with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
CSL
16.12%
Building Products Industry
- Max
- 19.42%
- Q3
- 13.74%
- Median
- 8.72%
- Q1
- 4.81%
- Min
- 0.46%
A Net Profit Margin of 16.12% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
DRS
7.31%
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 13.66%
- Q3
- 8.61%
- Median
- 6.59%
- Q1
- 4.92%
- Min
- 1.01%
DRS’s Net Profit Margin of 7.31% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
CSL
21.17%
Building Products Industry
- Max
- 26.72%
- Q3
- 17.70%
- Median
- 12.14%
- Q1
- 9.54%
- Min
- 1.65%
An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
DRS
9.47%
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 22.35%
- Q3
- 12.83%
- Median
- 9.29%
- Q1
- 6.38%
- Min
- -2.15%
DRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.47% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
Profitability at a Glance
Symbol | CSL | DRS |
---|---|---|
Return on Equity (TTM) | 33.90% | 9.80% |
Return on Assets (TTM) | 13.86% | 6.17% |
Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 16.12% | 7.31% |
Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 21.17% | 9.47% |
Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 36.92% | 23.15% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
CSL
2.19
Building Products Industry
- Max
- 3.10
- Q3
- 2.06
- Median
- 1.60
- Q1
- 1.30
- Min
- 0.88
CSL’s Current Ratio of 2.19 is in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.
DRS
2.11
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 3.35
- Q3
- 2.03
- Median
- 1.24
- Q1
- 1.04
- Min
- 0.77
DRS’s Current Ratio of 2.11 is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
CSL
0.89
Building Products Industry
- Max
- 1.64
- Q3
- 1.02
- Median
- 0.62
- Q1
- 0.20
- Min
- 0.00
CSL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.89 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
DRS
0.14
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 1.72
- Q3
- 0.96
- Median
- 0.63
- Q1
- 0.37
- Min
- 0.03
Falling into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, DRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
CSL
86.45
Building Products Industry
- Max
- 72.12
- Q3
- 34.39
- Median
- 23.97
- Q1
- 7.29
- Min
- 2.97
With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 86.45, CSL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Building Products industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.
DRS
13.57
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 36.57
- Q3
- 19.08
- Median
- 7.25
- Q1
- 2.65
- Min
- -7.63
DRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
Financial Strength at a Glance
Symbol | CSL | DRS |
---|---|---|
Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.19 | 2.11 |
Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 1.47 | 1.67 |
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 0.89 | 0.14 |
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 86.45 | 13.57 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
CSL
1.26%
Building Products Industry
- Max
- 2.51%
- Q3
- 1.92%
- Median
- 1.30%
- Q1
- 0.78%
- Min
- 0.00%
CSL’s Dividend Yield of 1.26% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.
DRS
0.40%
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 2.72%
- Q3
- 1.45%
- Median
- 0.48%
- Q1
- 0.08%
- Min
- 0.00%
DRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.40% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
CSL
22.20%
Building Products Industry
- Max
- 157.36%
- Q3
- 76.90%
- Median
- 30.70%
- Q1
- 17.97%
- Min
- 0.00%
CSL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.20% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
DRS
0.00%
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 110.40%
- Q3
- 50.43%
- Median
- 17.11%
- Q1
- 0.46%
- Min
- 0.00%
DRS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
Dividend at a Glance
Symbol | CSL | DRS |
---|---|---|
Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.26% | 0.40% |
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 22.20% | 0.00% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
CSL
17.67
Building Products Industry
- Max
- 45.60
- Q3
- 30.36
- Median
- 21.97
- Q1
- 17.37
- Min
- 12.44
CSL’s P/E Ratio of 17.67 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
DRS
47.46
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 67.20
- Q3
- 55.74
- Median
- 33.28
- Q1
- 27.49
- Min
- 15.02
DRS’s P/E Ratio of 47.46 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
CSL
2.85
Building Products Industry
- Max
- 5.90
- Q3
- 3.09
- Median
- 1.72
- Q1
- 1.07
- Min
- 0.37
CSL’s P/S Ratio of 2.85 aligns with the market consensus for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
DRS
3.47
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 9.06
- Q3
- 4.87
- Median
- 2.47
- Q1
- 1.61
- Min
- 0.33
DRS’s P/S Ratio of 3.47 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
CSL
7.62
Building Products Industry
- Max
- 10.99
- Q3
- 5.69
- Median
- 2.98
- Q1
- 1.80
- Min
- 0.66
CSL’s P/B Ratio of 7.62 is in the upper tier for the Building Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
DRS
4.76
Aerospace & Defense Industry
- Max
- 14.90
- Q3
- 8.93
- Median
- 4.70
- Q1
- 3.03
- Min
- 0.83
DRS’s P/B Ratio of 4.76 is within the conventional range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
Valuation at a Glance
Symbol | CSL | DRS |
---|---|---|
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 17.67 | 47.46 |
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 2.85 | 3.47 |
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 7.62 | 4.76 |
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 16.08 | 25.73 |