Seek Returns logo

CSL vs. DRS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CSL and DRS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCSLDRS
Company NameCarlisle Companies IncorporatedLeonardo DRS, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization13.04 billion USD9.19 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973June 24, 1985
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CSL and DRS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CSL vs. DRS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCSLDRS
5-Day Price Return-3.60%-2.16%
13-Week Price Return-19.63%-16.39%
26-Week Price Return-23.44%-14.27%
52-Week Price Return-32.60%-3.57%
Month-to-Date Return-5.69%-4.70%
Year-to-Date Return-16.89%7.83%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.47M1.41M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.52M1.14M
3-Month Volatility30.93%33.52%
Beta0.970.45

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CSL

35.51%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.23%
Median
14.24%
Q1
8.89%
Min
-11.14%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, CSL’s Return on Equity of 35.51% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

DRS

10.22%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
23.64%
Median
12.98%
Q1
8.07%
Min
-2.55%

DRS’s Return on Equity of 10.22% is on par with the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CSL vs. DRS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CSL

15.48%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.69%
Q3
13.95%
Median
8.32%
Q1
4.11%
Min
-8.61%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.48% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

DRS

7.43%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.96%
Q3
9.50%
Median
6.59%
Q1
4.45%
Min
1.01%

DRS’s Net Profit Margin of 7.43% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CSL vs. DRS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CSL

20.67%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.30%
Q3
17.93%
Median
12.09%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.72%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.67% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

DRS

9.58%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
17.97%
Q3
12.09%
Median
9.29%
Q1
6.41%
Min
-1.59%

DRS’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.58% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CSL vs. DRS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCSLDRS
Return on Equity (TTM)35.51%10.22%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.36%6.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.48%7.43%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.67%9.58%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.24%23.40%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

3.25

Building Products Industry

Max
2.78
Q3
1.93
Median
1.67
Q1
1.31
Min
0.93

CSL’s Current Ratio of 3.25 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Building Products industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

DRS

2.00

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
2.01
Median
1.22
Q1
1.07
Min
0.68

DRS’s Current Ratio of 2.00 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CSL vs. DRS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

1.45

Building Products Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
1.01
Median
0.62
Q1
0.16
Min
0.00

CSL’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Building Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.45. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

DRS

0.13

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.99
Median
0.63
Q1
0.39
Min
0.03

Falling into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, DRS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.13 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CSL vs. DRS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CSL

86.45

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
-2.48

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 86.45, CSL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Building Products industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

DRS

13.57

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
29.86
Q3
19.49
Median
7.09
Q1
2.62
Min
-7.63

DRS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.57 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CSL vs. DRS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCSLDRS
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.252.00
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.621.60
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.450.13
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)86.4513.57

Growth

Revenue Growth

CSL vs. DRS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CSL vs. DRS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CSL

1.41%

Building Products Industry

Max
3.92%
Q3
2.12%
Median
1.27%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Yield of 1.41% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

DRS

0.79%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.87%
Q3
1.46%
Median
0.58%
Q1
0.10%
Min
0.00%

DRS’s Dividend Yield of 0.79% is consistent with its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CSL vs. DRS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CSL

23.23%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
77.74%
Median
29.96%
Q1
18.92%
Min
0.00%

CSL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 23.23% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

DRS

40.91%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
110.40%
Q3
51.46%
Median
20.20%
Q1
4.21%
Min
0.00%

DRS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.91% is within the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CSL vs. DRS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCSLDRS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.41%0.79%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)23.23%40.91%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CSL

16.47

Building Products Industry

Max
41.45
Q3
26.91
Median
22.23
Q1
16.60
Min
9.49

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, CSL’s P/E Ratio of 16.47 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

DRS

34.41

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
94.22
Q3
53.31
Median
32.27
Q1
24.64
Min
14.57

DRS’s P/E Ratio of 34.41 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CSL vs. DRS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CSL

2.55

Building Products Industry

Max
5.11
Q3
2.85
Median
1.60
Q1
0.96
Min
0.34

CSL’s P/S Ratio of 2.55 aligns with the market consensus for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

DRS

2.56

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
7.20
Q3
3.95
Median
2.35
Q1
1.71
Min
0.32

DRS’s P/S Ratio of 2.56 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CSL vs. DRS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CSL

7.06

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.57
Median
2.89
Q1
1.85
Min
0.66

CSL’s P/B Ratio of 7.06 is in the upper tier for the Building Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

DRS

4.56

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
18.61
Q3
9.58
Median
5.45
Q1
3.11
Min
0.94

DRS’s P/B Ratio of 4.56 is within the conventional range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CSL vs. DRS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCSLDRS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.4734.41
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.552.56
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.064.56
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.9718.57