Seek Returns logo

CSGP vs. VTR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CSGP and VTR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

A key difference in structure is that CSGP is a conventional stock, whereas VTR is a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), a company that primarily invests in income-generating real estate.

SymbolCSGPVTR
Company NameCoStar Group, Inc.Ventas, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryReal Estate Management & DevelopmentHealth Care REITs
Market Capitalization37.09 billion USD30.91 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJuly 1, 1998May 5, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CSGP and VTR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CSGP vs. VTR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCSGPVTR
5-Day Price Return-8.16%-1.02%
13-Week Price Return16.16%4.42%
26-Week Price Return11.98%12.36%
52-Week Price Return21.56%15.31%
Month-to-Date Return-8.02%1.24%
Year-to-Date Return22.31%15.49%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.16M2.88M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.21M3.11M
3-Month Volatility25.20%15.00%
Beta0.890.92

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CSGP

1.29%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
14.65%
Q3
8.92%
Median
3.63%
Q1
1.63%
Min
-8.05%

CSGP’s Return on Equity of 1.29% is in the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

VTR

1.71%

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
10.72%
Q3
6.35%
Median
5.14%
Q1
1.99%
Min
1.33%

VTR’s Return on Equity of 1.71% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care REITs industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CSGP vs. VTR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CSGP

3.57%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
57.16%
Q3
24.60%
Median
9.48%
Q1
2.61%
Min
-26.61%

CSGP’s Net Profit Margin of 3.57% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VTR

3.61%

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
65.42%
Q3
41.17%
Median
26.13%
Q1
5.90%
Min
-44.62%

In the Health Care REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

CSGP vs. VTR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CSGP

-0.22%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
92.29%
Q3
43.61%
Median
20.96%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-48.90%

CSGP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.22%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

VTR

14.06%

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
86.51%
Q3
46.69%
Median
36.79%
Q1
14.52%
Min
-33.46%

In the Health Care REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

CSGP vs. VTR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCSGPVTR
Return on Equity (TTM)1.29%1.71%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.06%0.74%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.57%3.61%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-0.22%14.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.33%42.13%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CSGP

5.83

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.22
Median
1.42
Q1
1.03
Min
0.04

CSGP’s Current Ratio of 5.83 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

VTR

0.34

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
3.23
Q3
1.92
Median
1.21
Q1
0.19
Min
0.07

VTR’s Current Ratio of 0.34 aligns with the median group of the Health Care REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CSGP vs. VTR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CSGP

0.12

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.30
Median
0.84
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, CSGP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.12 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VTR

1.10

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
1.00
Median
0.89
Q1
0.65
Min
0.28

VTR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care REITs industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.10. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CSGP vs. VTR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

14.65

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
23.14
Q3
12.97
Median
3.68
Q1
1.29
Min
-4.45

CSGP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.65 is in the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

VTR

1.08

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
5.10
Q3
3.14
Median
1.96
Q1
1.08
Min
-1.73

VTR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care REITs industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CSGP vs. VTR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCSGPVTR
Current Ratio (MRQ)5.830.34
Quick Ratio (MRQ)5.720.34
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.121.10
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.651.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

CSGP vs. VTR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CSGP vs. VTR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CSGP

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
6.79%
Q3
3.51%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

CSGP currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VTR

2.48%

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
8.28%
Q3
6.85%
Median
5.55%
Q1
4.58%
Min
1.56%

VTR’s Dividend Yield of 2.48% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care REITs industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CSGP vs. VTR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
242.45%
Q3
106.13%
Median
55.27%
Q1
14.97%
Min
0.00%

CSGP has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VTR

413.76%

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
234.45%
Q3
210.75%
Median
158.46%
Q1
117.20%
Min
0.00%

At 413.76%, VTR’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Health Care REITs industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

CSGP vs. VTR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCSGPVTR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.48%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%413.76%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

344.90

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
41.09
Q3
23.50
Median
17.29
Q1
11.14
Min
6.36

At 344.90, CSGP’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

VTR

166.93

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
96.07
Q3
55.85
Median
27.80
Q1
24.06
Min
14.42

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Health Care REITs industry.

CSGP vs. VTR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

12.33

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
12.22
Q3
5.64
Median
2.53
Q1
0.98
Min
0.01

With a P/S Ratio of 12.33, CSGP trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

VTR

6.02

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
18.19
Q3
10.43
Median
6.09
Q1
4.41
Min
2.67

VTR’s P/S Ratio of 6.02 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care REITs industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CSGP vs. VTR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CSGP

3.94

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.36
Q3
1.18
Median
0.75
Q1
0.35
Min
0.06

At 3.94, CSGP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VTR

2.40

Health Care REITs Industry

Max
2.80
Q3
2.26
Median
1.54
Q1
0.86
Min
0.76

VTR’s P/B Ratio of 2.40 is in the upper tier for the Health Care REITs industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CSGP vs. VTR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Real Estate Management & Development and Health Care REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCSGPVTR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)344.90166.93
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)12.336.02
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.942.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)1,218.2533.70