Seek Returns logo

CSCO vs. JBL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CSCO and JBL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCSCOJBL
Company NameCisco Systems, Inc.Jabil Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization278.78 billion USD23.51 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateFebruary 16, 1990May 3, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CSCO and JBL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CSCO vs. JBL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCSCOJBL
5-Day Price Return0.72%-0.64%
13-Week Price Return14.16%35.45%
26-Week Price Return13.06%32.18%
52-Week Price Return56.93%114.74%
Month-to-Date Return3.41%-1.83%
Year-to-Date Return18.92%52.24%
10-Day Avg. Volume23.90M1.23M
3-Month Avg. Volume21.37M1.42M
3-Month Volatility19.90%32.78%
Beta0.981.26

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CSCO

21.50%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.05%
Q3
19.58%
Median
11.77%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-11.93%

In the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, CSCO’s Return on Equity of 21.50% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

JBL

38.64%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
29.99%
Q3
15.78%
Median
9.05%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.55%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 38.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CSCO vs. JBL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CSCO

17.60%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
14.32%
Median
5.31%
Q1
1.45%
Min
-12.72%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.60% places CSCO in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

JBL

2.02%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.55%
Q3
12.80%
Median
7.58%
Q1
3.09%
Min
-8.70%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CSCO vs. JBL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CSCO

20.30%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
18.90%
Median
6.21%
Q1
2.97%
Min
-20.72%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.30% places CSCO in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

JBL

4.08%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
16.04%
Median
9.75%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-12.63%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.08% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CSCO vs. JBL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCSCOJBL
Return on Equity (TTM)21.50%38.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.01%3.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.60%2.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.30%4.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.24%8.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CSCO

0.95

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
1.72
Median
1.46
Q1
1.18
Min
0.93

CSCO’s Current Ratio of 0.95 falls into the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

JBL

0.98

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.43
Q3
2.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.52
Min
0.64

JBL’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CSCO vs. JBL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CSCO

0.64

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
0.92
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

CSCO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.64 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

JBL

2.24

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.34
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.24, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CSCO vs. JBL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CSCO

936.58

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
181.73
Q3
113.63
Median
7.59
Q1
3.82
Min
-5.39

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 936.58, CSCO demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

JBL

11.12

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
101.00
Q3
43.88
Median
13.27
Q1
3.73
Min
-18.73

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.12 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CSCO vs. JBL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCSCOJBL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.950.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.870.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.642.24
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)936.5811.12

Growth

Revenue Growth

CSCO vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CSCO vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CSCO

2.30%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.88%
Q3
2.75%
Median
0.93%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CSCO’s Dividend Yield of 2.30% is consistent with its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

JBL

0.16%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.86%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.16% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CSCO vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CSCO

65.54%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
55.91%
Median
28.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CSCO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 65.54% is in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

JBL

6.59%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
161.37%
Q3
67.12%
Median
34.46%
Q1
3.82%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.59% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CSCO vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCSCOJBL
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.30%0.16%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)65.54%6.59%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CSCO

28.47

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
57.30
Q3
47.92
Median
27.50
Q1
17.89
Min
13.89

CSCO’s P/E Ratio of 28.47 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

JBL

40.82

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
73.87
Q3
41.11
Median
25.31
Q1
18.58
Min
8.59

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 40.82 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CSCO vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CSCO

5.01

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.03
Q3
5.53
Median
2.20
Q1
0.99
Min
0.40

CSCO’s P/S Ratio of 5.01 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

JBL

0.83

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.74
Q3
3.49
Median
2.03
Q1
1.16
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.83 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CSCO vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CSCO

4.92

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
9.66
Q3
5.60
Median
3.73
Q1
2.67
Min
0.30

CSCO’s P/B Ratio of 4.92 is within the conventional range for the Communications Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

JBL

14.04

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.45
Q3
3.49
Median
1.98
Q1
1.31
Min
0.35

At 14.04, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CSCO vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCSCOJBL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)28.4740.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.010.83
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.9214.04
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.7720.23