CRWV vs. TEAM: CoreWeave vs. Atlassian Stock Comparison

Company Profile

CoreWeave (CRWV) and Atlassian (TEAM) both fall under the Software & Services industry group, but CRWV is classified in IT Services while TEAM is classified in Software.

Atlassian (TEAM) has been public since December 9, 2015, giving it a longer listed trading history, while CoreWeave (CRWV) listed on March 28, 2025 and still has a shorter public-market record.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

CoreWeave (CRWV) carries a highly aggressive beta of 7.43, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Atlassian (TEAM) is closer to market-like at 1.19 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

CoreWeave (CRWV) reports a negative ROE of -43.60%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Atlassian (TEAM) reports 7.75%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CoreWeave (CRWV) reports a negative net margin of -25.40%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Atlassian (TEAM) reports 1.28%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CoreWeave (CRWV) reports a negative operating margin of -1.90%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Atlassian (TEAM) reports 10.65%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both companies are growing quickly, but CoreWeave (CRWV) at 167.94% is the standout with revenue growth above its industry range; Atlassian (TEAM) at 26.02% also sits in the top quartile.

Neither CoreWeave (CRWV) nor Atlassian (TEAM) reports a EPS growth value for this period, so a direct comparison isn't possible.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both CoreWeave (CRWV) at 0.46 and Atlassian (TEAM) at 0.72 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

Both balance sheets lean debt-heavy versus peers, but CRWV is more stretched: Atlassian (TEAM) at 1.35 sits in the higher-leverage quartile and CoreWeave (CRWV) at 10.27 is above its industry benchmark range.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither CoreWeave (CRWV) nor Atlassian (TEAM) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither CoreWeave (CRWV) nor Atlassian (TEAM) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Atlassian (TEAM) trades at 465.70 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while CoreWeave (CRWV) has no P/E ratio this period.

On P/S ratio, both CoreWeave (CRWV) at 3.37 and Atlassian (TEAM) at 5.63 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

CoreWeave (CRWV) at 5.09 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Atlassian (TEAM) at 42.54 prices above its benchmark range — TEAM looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics