Seek Returns logo

CRWV vs. NTAP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRWV and NTAP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRWVNTAP
Company NameCoreWeave, Inc.NetApp, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryIT ServicesTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Market Capitalization44.71 billion USD21.69 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 28, 2025November 21, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRWV and NTAP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRWV vs. NTAP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRWVNTAP
5-Day Price Return-8.02%-1.04%
13-Week Price Return5.69%6.79%
26-Week Price Return---7.91%
52-Week Price Return---17.68%
Month-to-Date Return-19.81%4.12%
Year-to-Date Return128.80%-6.60%
10-Day Avg. Volume32.31M1.63M
3-Month Avg. Volume19.90M1.92M
3-Month Volatility132.94%23.33%
Beta0.401.45

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRWV

-61.34%

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

CRWV has a negative Return on Equity of -61.34%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

NTAP

123.03%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
29.40%
Median
9.11%
Q1
6.06%
Min
-0.79%

NTAP’s Return on Equity of 123.03% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CRWV vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRWV

-35.73%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

CRWV has a negative Net Profit Margin of -35.73%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

NTAP

18.05%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.86%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.62%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.21%

NTAP’s Net Profit Margin of 18.05% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CRWV vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRWV

7.69%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

CRWV’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.69% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NTAP

20.34%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.80%
Q3
10.33%
Median
6.31%
Q1
4.86%
Min
2.53%

NTAP’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.34% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

CRWV vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRWVNTAP
Return on Equity (TTM)-61.34%123.03%
Return on Assets (TTM)-7.34%12.44%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-35.73%18.05%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.69%20.34%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)74.00%70.19%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

0.52

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

CRWV’s Current Ratio of 0.52 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

NTAP

1.26

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
1.98
Median
1.40
Q1
1.26
Min
0.70

NTAP’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRWV vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

2.91

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.91, CRWV operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the IT Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

NTAP

3.11

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
0.93
Median
0.32
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.11, NTAP operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CRWV vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

0.33

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

CRWV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.33 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

NTAP

17.59

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
204.63
Q3
90.22
Median
21.70
Q1
6.79
Min
-23.93

NTAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.59 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRWV vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRWVNTAP
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.521.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.511.22
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.913.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.3317.59

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRWV vs. NTAP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRWV vs. NTAP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRWV

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NTAP

1.96%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.50%
Q3
3.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Yield of 1.96% is consistent with its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRWV vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NTAP

35.75%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
66.07%
Median
42.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.75% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRWV vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRWVNTAP
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.96%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%35.75%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

--

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

P/E Ratio data for CRWV is currently unavailable.

NTAP

18.26

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.16
Q3
27.56
Median
17.85
Q1
12.48
Min
6.21

NTAP’s P/E Ratio of 18.26 is within the middle range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRWV vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

10.88

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 10.88, CRWV trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the IT Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

NTAP

3.30

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
1.99
Median
0.93
Q1
0.45
Min
0.04

NTAP’s P/S Ratio of 3.30 is in the upper echelon for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CRWV vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

20.48

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

At 20.48, CRWV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the IT Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NTAP

17.30

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
12.51
Q3
6.11
Median
1.73
Q1
1.01
Min
0.31

At 17.30, NTAP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CRWV vs. NTAP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRWVNTAP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--18.26
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)10.883.30
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)20.4817.30
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--16.19