CRWD vs. QNT: CrowdStrike vs. Quantinuum Stock Comparison

Company Profile

CrowdStrike (CRWD) and Quantinuum (QNT) both fall under the Software & Services industry group, but CRWD is classified in Software while QNT is classified in IT Services.

CrowdStrike (CRWD) has been public since June 12, 2019 with a meaningfully longer listed history, while Quantinuum (QNT) only listed on June 4, 2026 — long-window metrics on the QNT side should be interpreted with caution.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Quantinuum (QNT) reports a negative beta of -2.69, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. CrowdStrike (CRWD) has a non-negative beta of 1.18.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both CRWD and QNT need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: CrowdStrike (CRWD) earns 1.46% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Quantinuum (QNT) has no ROE this period.

Both CrowdStrike (CRWD) at 0.83% and Quantinuum (QNT) at 0.00% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both CrowdStrike (CRWD) at -2.26% and Quantinuum (QNT) at -6,939.56% report negative operating margin values, usually indicating operating losses over the period.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Quantinuum (QNT) at 34.61% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while CrowdStrike (CRWD) at 21.71% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for QNT.

Neither CrowdStrike (CRWD) nor Quantinuum (QNT) reports a EPS growth value for this period, so a direct comparison isn't possible.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

CrowdStrike (CRWD) at 1.57 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Quantinuum (QNT) at 15.49 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

Quantinuum (QNT) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while CrowdStrike (CRWD) at 0.16 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither CrowdStrike (CRWD) nor Quantinuum (QNT) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither CrowdStrike (CRWD) nor Quantinuum (QNT) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: CrowdStrike (CRWD) trades at 3,615.00 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Quantinuum (QNT) has no P/E ratio this period.

Investors are paying well above the peer range per dollar of sales for both CrowdStrike (CRWD) at 41.16 and Quantinuum (QNT) at 441.11 — each P/S ratio clears its industry’s benchmark range.

Measured against book value, both CrowdStrike (CRWD) at 43.53 and Quantinuum (QNT) at 64.89 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.

Valuation Metrics