CRH vs. RGLD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 22, 2025

Here’s a clear look at CRH and RGLD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	CRH	RGLD
Company Name	CRH plc	Royal Gold, Inc.
Country	Ireland	United States
GICS Sector	Materials	Materials
GICS Industry	Construction Materials	Metals & Mining
Market Capitalization	74.43 billion USD	11.17 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	July 13, 1989	June 9, 1981
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRH and RGLD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRH vs. RGLD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	CRH	RGLD
5-Day Price Return	-0.88%	0.06%
13-Week Price Return	12.29%	-1.96%
26-Week Price Return	4.01%	10.57%
52-Week Price Return	30.35%	22.96%
Month-to-Date Return	16.05%	12.08%
Year-to-Date Return	19.73%	28.71%
10-Day Avg. Volume	5.56M	0.82M
3-Month Avg. Volume	4.51M	0.72M
3-Month Volatility	30.41%	29.48%
Beta	1.33	0.39

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRH

15.20%

Construction Materials Industry

Max: 24.78%
Q3: 14.96%
Median: 10.37%
Q1: 4.14%
Min: -2.94%

In the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry, CRH’s Return on Equity of 15.20% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

RGLD

14.19%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 31.09%
Q3: 16.14%
Median: 7.01%
Q1: 1.15%
Min: -19.85%

RGLD’s Return on Equity of 14.19% is on par with the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CRH vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRH

9.09%

Construction Materials Industry

Max: 28.01%
Q3: 15.18%
Median: 9.09%
Q1: 3.32%
Min: -4.30%

CRH’s Net Profit Margin of 9.09% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction Materials industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RGLD

56.22%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 40.97%
Q3: 17.87%
Median: 7.03%
Q1: 1.82%
Min: -20.01%

RGLD’s Net Profit Margin of 56.22% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CRH vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRH

13.88%

Construction Materials Industry

Max: 31.67%
Q3: 18.49%
Median: 11.57%
Q1: 7.82%
Min: -1.44%

CRH’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.88% is around the midpoint for the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RGLD

64.70%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 59.48%
Q3: 26.06%
Median: 10.50%
Q1: 2.89%
Min: -21.46%

RGLD’s Operating Profit Margin of 64.70% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

CRH vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	CRH	RGLD
Return on Equity (TTM)	15.20%	14.19%
Return on Assets (TTM)	6.36%	13.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	9.09%	56.22%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	13.88%	64.70%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	35.99%	86.51%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRH

1.74

Construction Materials Industry

Max: 5.14
Q3: 2.89
Median: 1.92
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.79

CRH’s Current Ratio of 1.74 aligns with the median group of the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RGLD

4.49

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 4.81
Q3: 2.86
Median: 1.94
Q1: 1.45
Min: 0.13

RGLD’s Current Ratio of 4.49 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

CRH vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction Materials and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRH

0.71

Construction Materials Industry

Max: 0.99
Q3: 0.72
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.30
Min: 0.00

CRH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.71 is typical for the Construction Materials industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RGLD

0.00

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 1.11
Q3: 0.52
Median: 0.29
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, RGLD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CRH vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction Materials and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRH

11.05

Construction Materials Industry

Max: 54.89
Q3: 34.04
Median: 7.92
Q1: 4.28
Min: -6.24

CRH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RGLD

112.92

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 65.47
Q3: 29.91
Median: 5.88
Q1: 0.91
Min: -26.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 112.92, RGLD demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CRH vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	CRH	RGLD
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.74	4.49
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.11	4.29
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.71	0.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	11.05	112.92

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRH vs. RGLD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRH vs. RGLD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRH

1.30%

Construction Materials Industry

Max: 5.91%
Q3: 4.64%
Median: 2.57%
Q1: 1.11%
Min: 0.00%

CRH’s Dividend Yield of 1.30% is consistent with its peers in the Construction Materials industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RGLD

1.00%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 9.36%
Q3: 3.78%
Median: 1.41%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RGLD’s Dividend Yield of 1.00% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRH vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRH

28.69%

Construction Materials Industry

Max: 174.17%
Q3: 91.80%
Median: 44.42%
Q1: 23.07%
Min: 0.00%

CRH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.69% is within the typical range for the Construction Materials industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RGLD

24.89%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 138.08%
Q3: 63.28%
Median: 38.78%
Q1: 12.84%
Min: 0.00%

RGLD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 24.89% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CRH vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	CRH	RGLD
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.30%	1.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	28.69%	24.89%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRH

22.75

Construction Materials Industry

Max: 49.05
Q3: 24.51
Median: 12.09
Q1: 7.70
Min: 4.06

CRH’s P/E Ratio of 22.75 is within the middle range for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RGLD

24.77

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 57.44
Q3: 32.87
Median: 18.04
Q1: 9.84
Min: 0.00

RGLD’s P/E Ratio of 24.77 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRH vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRH

2.07

Construction Materials Industry

Max: 4.03
Q3: 2.26
Median: 1.31
Q1: 0.66
Min: 0.19

CRH’s P/S Ratio of 2.07 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RGLD

13.92

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 6.52
Q3: 3.19
Median: 1.97
Q1: 0.59
Min: 0.14

With a P/S Ratio of 13.92, RGLD trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Metals & Mining industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CRH vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRH

2.77

Construction Materials Industry

Max: 3.19
Q3: 1.80
Median: 1.08
Q1: 0.72
Min: 0.11

CRH’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Construction Materials industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

RGLD

3.54

Metals & Mining Industry

Max: 3.92
Q3: 2.15
Median: 1.40
Q1: 0.84
Min: 0.25

RGLD’s P/B Ratio of 3.54 is in the upper tier for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CRH vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction Materials and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	CRH	RGLD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	22.75	24.77
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.07	13.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	2.77	3.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	21.53	32.21