CRH vs. ECL: CRH vs. Ecolab Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do CRH (CRH) and Ecolab (ECL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

CRH (CRH) and Ecolab (ECL) both fall under the Materials industry group, but CRH is classified in Construction Materials while ECL is classified in Chemicals.

Company profile comparison for CRH (CRH) and Ecolab (ECL)
Profile Item	CRH	ECL
Name	CRH plc Ordinary Shares	Ecolab Inc.
Country/Region	Ireland	United States
GICS Sector	Materials	Materials
GICS Industry Group	Materials	Materials
GICS Industry	Construction Materials	Chemicals
GICS Sub-Industry	Construction Materials	Specialty Chemicals
Market Capitalization	63.07 billion USD	84.33 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	July 13, 1989	February 21, 1973
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CRH

ECL

GSPC

CRH (CRH) vs. Ecolab (ECL), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for CRH (CRH) and Ecolab (ECL). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for CRH (CRH) and Ecolab (ECL). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for CRH (CRH) and Ecolab (ECL)
Metric	CRH	ECL
Total Return (1Y)	-12.62%	20.33%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	20.74%	21.41%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	17.05%	6.90%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CRH

ECL

GSPC

CRH (CRH) vs. Ecolab (ECL), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for CRH (CRH) and Ecolab (ECL). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for CRH (CRH) and Ecolab (ECL)
Metric	CRH	ECL
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	34.06%	21.72%
Beta (5Y)	1.31	0.84
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-39.04%	-43.70%
Avg. Volume (3M)	5.16M	1.40M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

CRH and ECL are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for CRH (CRH) and Ecolab (ECL)
Metric	CRH	ECL
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	-0.50	0.74
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	-0.73	1.13

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Ecolab (ECL) at 20.77% sits in the top ROE quartile, while CRH (CRH) at 13.92% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for ECL.

CRH

Materials industry group

13.92%

Max: 52.88%
Q3: 19.49%
CRH: 13.92%
Median: 8.76%
Q1: -3.41%
Min: -32.81%

ECL

Materials industry group

20.77%

Max: 52.88%
ECL: 20.77%
Q3: 19.49%
Median: 8.76%
Q1: -3.41%
Min: -32.81%

CRH (CRH) vs. Ecolab (ECL): A comparison of their ROE against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both CRH (CRH) at 9.19% and Ecolab (ECL) at 11.99% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

CRH

Materials industry group

9.19%

Max: 38.66%
Q3: 15.98%
CRH: 9.19%
Median: 5.28%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -20.40%

ECL

Materials industry group

11.99%

Max: 38.66%
Q3: 15.98%
ECL: 11.99%
Median: 5.28%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -20.40%

CRH (CRH) vs. Ecolab (ECL): A comparison of their net margin against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both CRH (CRH) at 18.18% and Ecolab (ECL) at 19.22% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

CRH

Materials industry group

18.18%

Max: 66.70%
Q3: 28.92%
CRH: 18.18%
Median: 12.56%
Q1: 3.28%
Min: -14.07%

ECL

Materials industry group

19.22%

Max: 66.70%
Q3: 28.92%
ECL: 19.22%
Median: 12.56%
Q1: 3.28%
Min: -14.07%

CRH (CRH) vs. Ecolab (ECL): A comparison of their operating margin against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for CRH (CRH) and Ecolab (ECL)
Metric	CRH	ECL
ROE (TTM)	13.92%	20.77%
ROA (TTM)	5.73%	7.29%
Net Margin (TTM)	9.19%	11.99%
Operating Margin (TTM)	18.18%	19.22%
Gross Margin (TTM)	36.23%	44.04%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both CRH (CRH) at 5.27% and Ecolab (ECL) at 2.16% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

CRH (CRH) vs. Ecolab (ECL): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both CRH (CRH) at 9.76% and Ecolab (ECL) at -1.22% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

CRH (CRH) vs. Ecolab (ECL): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for CRH (CRH) and Ecolab (ECL)
Metric	CRH	ECL
Revenue Growth (YoY)	5.27%	2.16%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	4.60%	4.26%
EPS Growth (YoY)	9.76%	-1.22%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	3.08%	24.09%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRH (CRH) at 1.46 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Ecolab (ECL) at 1.11 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for ECL.

CRH

Materials industry group

1.46

Max: 5.96
Q3: 3.30
Median: 2.24
CRH: 1.46
Q1: 1.45
Min: 0.16

ECL

Materials industry group

1.11

Max: 5.96
Q3: 3.30
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.45
ECL: 1.11
Min: 0.16

CRH (CRH) vs. Ecolab (ECL): A comparison of their current ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

CRH (CRH) at 0.82 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Ecolab (ECL) at 1.33 uses more debt funding than most peers.

CRH

Materials industry group

0.82

Max: 1.98
Q3: 0.89
CRH: 0.82
Median: 0.47
Q1: 0.13
Min: 0.00

ECL

Materials industry group

1.33

Max: 1.98
ECL: 1.33
Q3: 0.89
Median: 0.47
Q1: 0.13
Min: 0.00

CRH (CRH) vs. Ecolab (ECL): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for CRH (CRH) and Ecolab (ECL)
Metric	CRH	ECL
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.46	1.11
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	0.82	1.33
Net Debt / EBITDA	2.12	3.09

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both CRH (CRH) at 1.61% and Ecolab (ECL) at 0.95% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

CRH

Materials industry group

1.61%

Max: 4.52%
Q3: 1.85%
CRH: 1.61%
Median: 0.38%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ECL

Materials industry group

0.95%

Max: 4.52%
Q3: 1.85%
ECL: 0.95%
Median: 0.38%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CRH (CRH) vs. Ecolab (ECL): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both CRH (CRH) at 29.00% and Ecolab (ECL) at 39.73% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

CRH

Materials industry group

29.00%

Max: 83.62%
Q3: 41.37%
CRH: 29.00%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ECL

Materials industry group

39.73%

Max: 83.62%
Q3: 41.37%
ECL: 39.73%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CRH (CRH) vs. Ecolab (ECL): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for CRH (CRH) and Ecolab (ECL)
Metric	CRH	ECL
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.61%	0.95%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	29.00%	39.73%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

CRH (CRH) at 17.85 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Ecolab (ECL) at 40.91 sits in the richer quartile — ECL needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

CRH

Materials industry group

17.85

Max: 59.00
Q3: 32.93
Median: 18.82
CRH: 17.85
Q1: 11.96
Min: 3.93

ECL

Materials industry group

40.91

Max: 59.00
ECL: 40.91
Q3: 32.93
Median: 18.82
Q1: 11.96
Min: 3.93

CRH (CRH) vs. Ecolab (ECL): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

CRH (CRH) at 1.62 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ecolab (ECL) at 4.85 sits in the pricier quartile — ECL costs more per dollar of sales.

CRH

Materials industry group

1.62

Max: 9.62
Q3: 4.34
Median: 1.87
CRH: 1.62
Q1: 0.73
Min: 0.00

ECL

Materials industry group

4.85

Max: 9.62
ECL: 4.85
Q3: 4.34
Median: 1.87
Q1: 0.73
Min: 0.00

CRH (CRH) vs. Ecolab (ECL): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

CRH (CRH) at 2.52 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Ecolab (ECL) at 8.09 prices above its benchmark range — ECL looks rich relative to book.

CRH

Materials industry group

2.52

Max: 6.59
Q3: 3.55
CRH: 2.52
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.26
Min: -0.17

ECL

Materials industry group

8.09

ECL: 8.09
Max: 6.59
Q3: 3.55
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.26
Min: -0.17

CRH (CRH) vs. Ecolab (ECL): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for CRH (CRH) and Ecolab (ECL)
Metric	CRH	ECL
P/E Ratio (TTM)	17.85	40.91
P/S Ratio (TTM)	1.62	4.85
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	2.52	8.09
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	3.61%	1.71%