CRBG vs. GS: Corebridge Financial vs. Goldman Sachs Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Corebridge Financial (CRBG) and Goldman Sachs (GS) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but CRBG is classified in Financial Services while GS is classified in Capital Markets.

Goldman Sachs (GS) has more than two decades of public-market history since May 4, 1999, whereas Corebridge Financial (CRBG) listed on September 16, 2022 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 20.08% and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 17.71% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Goldman Sachs (GS) at 31.21% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 10.76%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Both Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 39.53% and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 38.37% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Goldman Sachs (GS) at 8.92% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at -5.07% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Goldman Sachs (GS) at 26.59% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at -118.28% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Corebridge Financial (CRBG) in Financial Services and Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Corebridge Financial (CRBG) in Financial Services and Goldman Sachs (GS) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 2.89% and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 2.07% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

Both Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 22.20% and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 25.88% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 7.64 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Goldman Sachs (GS) at 12.45 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for CRBG, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 0.73 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Goldman Sachs (GS) at 3.52 prices around its industry’s middle — CRBG costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

On P/B ratio, both Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 2.41 and Goldman Sachs (GS) at 2.36 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics