Seek Returns logo

CPT vs. IRM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CPT and IRM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both CPT and IRM are Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). These entities are required to distribute the majority of their taxable income to shareholders, often resulting in higher dividend yields.

SymbolCPTIRM
Company NameCamden Property TrustIron Mountain Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryResidential REITsSpecialized REITs
Market Capitalization11.24 billion USD26.69 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 22, 1993February 1, 1996
Security TypeREITREIT

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CPT and IRM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CPT vs. IRM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCPTIRM
5-Day Price Return1.07%-10.71%
13-Week Price Return-3.94%-0.13%
26-Week Price Return-12.85%-6.17%
52-Week Price Return-14.45%-21.22%
Month-to-Date Return4.30%-11.25%
Year-to-Date Return-10.58%-13.07%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.38M2.25M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.04M1.46M
3-Month Volatility18.73%30.11%
Beta0.801.17

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CPT

5.85%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
15.13%
Q3
9.79%
Median
6.73%
Q1
5.85%
Min
0.65%

CPT’s Return on Equity of 5.85% is on par with the norm for the Residential REITs industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

IRM

85.19%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
21.01%
Q3
18.18%
Median
9.46%
Q1
6.81%
Min
-1.71%

IRM’s Return on Equity of 85.19% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CPT vs. IRM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CPT

17.15%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
49.84%
Q3
42.29%
Median
25.23%
Q1
17.15%
Min
-0.30%

In the Residential REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

IRM

2.40%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
89.50%
Q3
41.93%
Median
28.06%
Q1
6.77%
Min
-1.41%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Net Profit Margin is often not the primary profitability metric.

CPT vs. IRM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CPT

9.54%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
56.43%
Q3
48.20%
Median
28.02%
Q1
18.72%
Min
-7.36%

In the Residential REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

IRM

16.64%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
107.13%
Q3
56.09%
Median
42.12%
Q1
16.71%
Min
8.05%

In the Specialized REITs industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

CPT vs. IRM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCPTIRM
Return on Equity (TTM)5.85%85.19%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.99%0.81%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.15%2.40%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.54%16.64%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)61.28%66.17%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CPT

0.07

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.58
Q3
0.72
Median
0.19
Q1
0.09
Min
0.00

CPT’s Current Ratio of 0.07 falls into the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

IRM

0.66

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
1.96
Q3
1.17
Median
0.59
Q1
0.40
Min
0.18

IRM’s Current Ratio of 0.66 aligns with the median group of the Specialized REITs industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CPT vs. IRM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CPT

0.82

Residential REITs Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.11
Median
0.82
Q1
0.68
Min
0.28

CPT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.82 is typical for the Residential REITs industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

IRM

685.59

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.86
Q3
3.59
Median
1.22
Q1
0.62
Min
0.16

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 685.59, IRM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Specialized REITs industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CPT vs. IRM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CPT

1.14

Residential REITs Industry

Max
5.11
Q3
4.01
Median
2.53
Q1
1.52
Min
0.52

In the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry, CPT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.14 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

IRM

1.36

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.21
Median
2.99
Q1
2.08
Min
1.14

In the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, IRM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.36 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CPT vs. IRM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCPTIRM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.070.66
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.070.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.82685.59
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.141.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

CPT vs. IRM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CPT vs. IRM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CPT

3.14%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
5.50%
Q3
4.61%
Median
3.94%
Q1
3.53%
Min
2.40%

CPT’s Dividend Yield of 3.14% is in the lower quartile for the Residential REITs industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

IRM

3.32%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
7.38%
Q3
5.67%
Median
4.70%
Q1
3.55%
Min
2.22%

IRM’s Dividend Yield of 3.32% is in the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CPT vs. IRM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CPT

170.55%

Residential REITs Industry

Max
277.28%
Q3
165.36%
Median
103.47%
Q1
84.26%
Min
24.03%

CPT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 170.55% is in the upper quartile for the Residential REITs industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

IRM

325.94%

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
218.54%
Q3
158.23%
Median
122.76%
Q1
94.76%
Min
16.73%

At 325.94%, IRM’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Specialized REITs industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

CPT vs. IRM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCPTIRM
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.14%3.32%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)170.55%325.94%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CPT

54.40

Residential REITs Industry

Max
53.82
Q3
37.09
Median
28.15
Q1
19.50
Min
7.75

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Residential REITs industry.

IRM

169.59

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
72.02
Q3
45.17
Median
27.34
Q1
18.18
Min
4.41

The P/E Ratio is often not the primary metric for valuation in the Specialized REITs industry.

CPT vs. IRM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CPT

9.33

Residential REITs Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
8.35
Median
6.96
Q1
6.23
Min
4.99

With a P/S Ratio of 9.33, CPT trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Residential REITs industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

IRM

4.07

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
10.44
Q3
8.46
Median
7.76
Q1
5.30
Min
2.06

In the lower quartile for the Specialized REITs industry, IRM’s P/S Ratio of 4.07 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CPT vs. IRM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CPT

2.52

Residential REITs Industry

Max
3.77
Q3
2.52
Median
2.04
Q1
1.46
Min
0.68

CPT’s P/B Ratio of 2.52 is within the conventional range for the Residential REITs industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

IRM

1,254.25

Specialized REITs Industry

Max
12.00
Q3
6.44
Median
2.47
Q1
1.61
Min
0.61

At 1,254.25, IRM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Specialized REITs industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CPT vs. IRM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Residential REITs and Specialized REITs industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCPTIRM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)54.40169.59
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.334.07
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.521,254.25
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)38.06384.89