CPNG vs. PAG: Coupang vs. Penske Automotive Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Coupang (CPNG) and Penske Automotive (PAG) both fall under the Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail industry group, but CPNG is classified in Broadline Retail while PAG is classified in Specialty Retail.

Penske Automotive (PAG) has more than two decades of public-market history since October 23, 1996, whereas Coupang (CPNG) listed on March 11, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Coupang (CPNG) is heavily traded at around 15.76M shares per day, whereas Penske Automotive (PAG) sees a more moderate 450.08K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Coupang (CPNG) reports a negative ROE of -35.97%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Penske Automotive (PAG) reports 15.47%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Coupang (CPNG) reports a negative net margin of -3.77%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Penske Automotive (PAG) reports 2.77%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Coupang (CPNG) reports a negative operating margin of -2.03%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Penske Automotive (PAG) reports 3.60%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Coupang (CPNG) at 14.09% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Penske Automotive (PAG) at -0.18% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Coupang (CPNG) at 37.50% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Penske Automotive (PAG) at 2.84% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for CPNG.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both Coupang (CPNG) at 0.80 and Penske Automotive (PAG) at 0.98 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

Both Coupang (CPNG) at 1.78 and Penske Automotive (PAG) at 1.53 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Coupang (CPNG) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Penske Automotive (PAG) reports a yield of 2.70%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Coupang (CPNG) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Penske Automotive (PAG) reports a payout of 41.11%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Penske Automotive (PAG) trades at 14.80 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Coupang (CPNG) has no P/E ratio this period.

On P/S ratio, both Coupang (CPNG) at 0.81 and Penske Automotive (PAG) at 0.43 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

Penske Automotive (PAG) at 2.35 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Coupang (CPNG) at 10.26 carries an above-peer premium to book — CPNG is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics